Brugg Lashing

Category: Productivity

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 45 keywords for Brugg Lashing in Apple App Store

Developer: BRUGG Lifting AG Category: productivity

Brugg Lashing tracks 45 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 45 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 49.1, difficulty 40.1.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 45 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

49.1

Top keyword: help

Avg difficulty

40.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

help

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,236
85.2
contact

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 358
74.0
team

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 445
74.5
using

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 924
82.6
provide

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 293
72.9

Unranked opportunities

help

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236
contact

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.3 • Competitors: 358
team

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Competitors: 445
using

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 61.4 • Competitors: 924
provide

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.4 • Competitors: 293

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
using

Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
may

Total apps: 3,755 • Major competitors: 871

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
user

Total apps: 2,498 • Major competitors: 453

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.7
various

Total apps: 2,177 • Major competitors: 374

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
contact	58	100	53	74 1,869 competing apps Median installs: 241,775 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	358 major competitor apps
team	58	100	52	75 1,972 competing apps Median installs: 284,662 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	445 major competitor apps
using	58	100	61	83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	924 major competitor apps
provide	58	100	49	73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	293 major competitor apps
variety	58	100	52	75 2,160 competing apps Median installs: 261,825 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	480 major competitor apps
added	58	100	49	69 1,150 competing apps Median installs: 269,450 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	248 major competitor apps
help	59	100	61	85 5,873 competing apps Median installs: 257,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,236 major competitor apps
various	58	100	50	75 2,177 competing apps Median installs: 229,325 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	374 major competitor apps
minimum	20	100	50	51 185 competing apps Median installs: 254,825 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	49 major competitor apps
angle	57	100	31	46 111 competing apps Median installs: 292,750 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	20 major competitor apps
user	58	100	52	77 2,498 competing apps Median installs: 242,250 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	453 major competitor apps
calculation	20	100	33	42 70 competing apps Median installs: 268,688 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	18 major competitor apps
weight	58	100	41	59 425 competing apps Median installs: 235,600 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	87 major competitor apps
increased	57	100	33	46 106 competing apps Median installs: 247,312 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	21 major competitor apps
understand	58	100	44	65 776 competing apps Median installs: 244,462 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	142 major competitor apps
calculated	57	100	32	42 71 competing apps Median installs: 239,800 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	11 major competitor apps
integrated	58	100	44	61 519 competing apps Median installs: 196,650 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	63 major competitor apps
number	58	100	54	73 1,666 competing apps Median installs: 249,538 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	332 major competitor apps
info	20	100	53	60 430 competing apps Median installs: 272,962 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	120 major competitor apps
additional	58	100	52	70 1,201 competing apps Median installs: 281,500 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	271 major competitor apps
calculates	57	100	28	40 60 competing apps Median installs: 214,475 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	13 major competitor apps
deal	20	100	44	55 260 competing apps Median installs: 299,588 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	73 major competitor apps
may	58	100	62	81 3,755 competing apps Median installs: 275,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	871 major competitor apps
questions	58	100	52	71 1,410 competing apps Median installs: 254,875 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	312 major competitor apps
tips	58	100	53	64 666 competing apps Median installs: 262,562 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	166 major competitor apps

App Description

The App for securing loads calculates the optimal number of lashing systems in tie-down lashing from the weight of the load, lashing angle, given stretching force and the friction coefficient entered; by contrast, in diagonal lashing the Minimum Lashing Capacity (LC) when using 4 lashing systems is calculated from the weight of the load, lashing angle and friction coefficient entered.
In the calculation process, the user may get additional help by pressing various Info buttons.

The integrated goniometer and a variety of tips presented in easy-to-understand graphics provide the user with an added value by mobility and increased safety. The contact persons of the Brugg Team will be pleased to deal with your questions and suggestions.