BRUGG Lashing PRO
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 51 keywords for BRUGG Lashing PRO in Google Play
BRUGG Lashing PRO tracks 51 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 51 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 50.4.
The mobile calculation tool for load securing. Pro version
Tracked keywords
51
0 ranked • 51 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: info
Avg difficulty
50.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.2
info
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 939
- 64.9
minimum
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 809
- 63.6
calculation
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 344
- 65.9
weight
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 774
- 70.1
integrated
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,066
Unranked opportunities
info
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 939
minimum
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Competitors: 809
calculation
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 344
weight
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Competitors: 774
integrated
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.7 • Competitors: 1,066
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
mobile
Total apps: 113,294 • Major competitors: 10,537
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5
offers
Total apps: 82,090 • Major competitors: 9,319
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.3
online
Total apps: 80,029 • Major competitors: 9,770
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.8
save
Total apps: 75,490 • Major competitors: 9,726
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| online | 66 | 100 | 61 | 84 80,029 competing apps Median installs: 33,297 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,770 major competitor apps |
| version | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,300 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 58 | 81 54,601 competing apps Median installs: 29,805 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,243 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,371 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 34,741 competing apps Median installs: 33,606 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,020 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 65 | 83 75,490 competing apps Median installs: 41,387 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 9,726 major competitor apps |
| using | 65 | 100 | 64 | 86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 13,323 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 60 | 86 113,294 competing apps Median installs: 25,796 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,537 major competitor apps |
| variety | 68 | 100 | 57 | 80 49,032 competing apps Median installs: 47,792 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 7,236 major competitor apps |
| added | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 23,852 competing apps Median installs: 42,355 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,862 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,464 major competitor apps |
| pro | 71 | 100 | 64 | 72 16,544 competing apps Median installs: 52,159 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 2,522 major competitor apps |
| minimum | 72 | 100 | 47 | 65 6,312 competing apps Median installs: 46,880 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 809 major competitor apps |
| angle | 70 | 100 | 41 | 57 2,052 competing apps Median installs: 47,046 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 282 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 53 | 78 38,943 competing apps Median installs: 28,037 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,793 major competitor apps |
| suggestions | 71 | 100 | 62 | 72 17,127 competing apps Median installs: 39,571 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,812 major competitor apps |
| location | 70 | 100 | 61 | 76 28,943 competing apps Median installs: 31,126 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,077 major competitor apps |
| clear | 69 | 100 | 55 | 78 34,357 competing apps Median installs: 27,922 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,323 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 72 | 100 | 43 | 64 5,305 competing apps Median installs: 28,825 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 344 major competitor apps |
| smartphone | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 19,799 competing apps Median installs: 31,124 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,813 major competitor apps |
| weight | 72 | 100 | 45 | 66 7,160 competing apps Median installs: 33,743 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 774 major competitor apps |
| provided | 70 | 100 | 49 | 75 23,750 competing apps Median installs: 29,607 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,862 major competitor apps |
| calculated | 71 | 100 | 38 | 59 2,717 competing apps Median installs: 29,096 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 233 major competitor apps |
| integrated | 72 | 100 | 49 | 70 12,624 competing apps Median installs: 24,158 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,066 major competitor apps |
App Description
The mobile calculation tool for load securing. Pro version
In diagonal lashing, the Minimum Lashing Capacity (LC) when using 4 lashing systems is calculated from the weight of the load, lashing angle and coefficient of friction entered.
An additional support for users during the calculation is provided by various info buttons.
------
With its integrated protractor and a variety of tips with clear diagrams, Brugg Lashing offers a “mobile added value” and enhanced safety.
------
PRO Features:
Save calculations – on the smartphone or online by registering at bruggdigital.com
Add pictures to calculations
Add location via GPS
Generate, save and forward PDFs
------
The Brugg-Team is at your disposal for questions and suggestions under info.lifting@brugg.com.