BRUGG Lashing

Developer: BRUGG Lifting Apps

Category: Productivity

64K installs

ratings

+116 weekly installs

+339 monthly installs

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 47 keywords for BRUGG Lashing in Google Play

Developer: BRUGG Lifting Apps Category: productivity

BRUGG Lashing tracks 47 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 47 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.7, difficulty 47.1.

Tools for calculating the optimal number of lashing systems on the spot.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 47 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.7

Top keyword: info

Avg difficulty

47.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

info

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 939
68.2
minimum

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 809
64.9
calculation

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 344
63.6
weight

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 774
65.9
integrated

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,066
70.1

Unranked opportunities

info

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.9 • Competitors: 939
minimum

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Competitors: 809
calculation

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 344
weight

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.4 • Competitors: 774
integrated

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 48.7 • Competitors: 1,066

High competition keywords

help

Total apps: 123,065 • Major competitors: 14,840

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.0
using

Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
various

Total apps: 74,125 • Major competitors: 9,464

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
provide

Total apps: 61,536 • Major competitors: 5,453

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5
user

Total apps: 59,325 • Major competitors: 4,926

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
contact	67	100	58	82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 30,986 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,729 major competitor apps
team	69	100	58	78 34,741 competing apps Median installs: 33,606 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	4,020 major competitor apps
using	65	100	64	86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	13,323 major competitor apps
provide	67	100	55	82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	5,453 major competitor apps
variety	68	100	57	80 49,032 competing apps Median installs: 47,792 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	7,236 major competitor apps
added	70	100	58	75 23,852 competing apps Median installs: 42,355 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,862 major competitor apps
help	65	100	66	87 123,065 competing apps Median installs: 36,787 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	14,840 major competitor apps
various	67	100	58	83 74,125 competing apps Median installs: 40,134 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	9,464 major competitor apps
minimum	72	100	47	65 6,312 competing apps Median installs: 46,880 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	809 major competitor apps
angle	70	100	41	57 2,052 competing apps Median installs: 47,046 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	282 major competitor apps
tools	69	100	62	76 29,774 competing apps Median installs: 35,852 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	3,872 major competitor apps
user	67	100	60	82 59,325 competing apps Median installs: 25,959 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	4,926 major competitor apps
calculation	72	100	43	64 5,305 competing apps Median installs: 28,825 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	344 major competitor apps
weight	72	100	45	66 7,160 competing apps Median installs: 33,743 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	774 major competitor apps
increased	71	100	39	58 2,480 competing apps Median installs: 29,604 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	247 major competitor apps
understand	70	100	51	75 26,174 competing apps Median installs: 27,627 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	2,036 major competitor apps
calculated	71	100	38	59 2,717 competing apps Median installs: 29,096 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	233 major competitor apps
integrated	72	100	49	70 12,624 competing apps Median installs: 24,158 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,066 major competitor apps
number	68	100	56	80 47,703 competing apps Median installs: 37,484 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,415 major competitor apps
info	73	100	50	68 9,773 competing apps Median installs: 35,350 Avg rating: 3.3	—	—	939 major competitor apps
additional	70	100	58	75 23,511 competing apps Median installs: 35,684 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	2,698 major competitor apps
calculates	71	100	37	58 2,360 competing apps Median installs: 25,802 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	150 major competitor apps
deal	72	100	44	63 4,694 competing apps Median installs: 38,118 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	648 major competitor apps
may	68	100	69	80 48,197 competing apps Median installs: 37,379 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	5,628 major competitor apps
questions	69	100	57	78 34,766 competing apps Median installs: 30,846 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	2,978 major competitor apps

App Description

Tools for calculating the optimal number of lashing systems on the spot.

The App for securing loads calculates the optimal number of lashing systems in tie-down lashing from the weight of the load, lashing angle, given stretching force and the friction coefficient entered; by contrast, in diagonal lashing the Minimum Lashing Capacity (LC) when using 4 lashing systems is calculated from the weight of the load, lashing angle and friction coefficient entered.
In the calculation process, the user may get additional help by pressing various Info buttons.

The integrated goniometer and a variety of tips presented in easy-to-understand graphics provide the user with an added value by mobility and increased safety. The contact persons of the Brugg Team will be pleased to deal with your questions and suggestions.