RightRide
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 83 keywords for RightRide in Google Play
RightRide tracks 83 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 83 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 48.1.
MEASURE, IMPROVE, OVERCOME
Tracked keywords
83
0 ranked • 83 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.6
Top keyword: called
Avg difficulty
48.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.8
called
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 813
- 69.9
changes
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,225
- 66.2
volume
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 55.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,088
- 64.4
continuously
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 605
- 67.2
term
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 782
Unranked opportunities
called
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.5 • Competitors: 813
changes
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 1,225
volume
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 55.5 • Competitors: 1,088
continuously
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 605
term
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.9 • Competitors: 782
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
every
Total apps: 125,665 • Major competitors: 16,037
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.3
designed
Total apps: 96,808 • Major competitors: 9,110
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
easily
Total apps: 96,583 • Major competitors: 10,194
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
create
Total apps: 93,845 • Major competitors: 13,574
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 69.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| level | 68 | 100 | 60 | 80 47,860 competing apps Median installs: 42,032 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 6,533 major competitor apps |
| changes | 72 | 100 | 50 | 70 12,399 competing apps Median installs: 32,219 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,225 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 57 | 79 39,640 competing apps Median installs: 36,260 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 4,807 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 6,026 major competitor apps |
| tailored | 71 | 100 | 51 | 72 15,571 competing apps Median installs: 27,345 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,593 major competitor apps |
| heart | 71 | 100 | 50 | 71 15,090 competing apps Median installs: 29,042 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,461 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 54 | 71 15,144 competing apps Median installs: 20,930 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,085 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 57 | 85 96,808 competing apps Median installs: 27,484 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 9,110 major competitor apps |
| manage | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 61,484 competing apps Median installs: 27,358 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,560 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 65 | 89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 19,592 major competitor apps |
| volume | 72 | 100 | 55 | 66 7,437 competing apps Median installs: 46,520 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 1,088 major competitor apps |
| dynamic | 71 | 100 | 54 | 73 18,485 competing apps Median installs: 37,329 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 2,447 major competitor apps |
| test | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 41,781 competing apps Median installs: 34,406 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,928 major competitor apps |
| power | 69 | 100 | 59 | 76 29,892 competing apps Median installs: 40,812 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,881 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 69 | 85 93,845 competing apps Median installs: 45,191 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 13,574 major competitor apps |
| provides | 67 | 100 | 60 | 83 71,787 competing apps Median installs: 26,302 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 6,088 major competitor apps |
| plan | 70 | 100 | 59 | 75 25,531 competing apps Median installs: 31,850 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,918 major competitor apps |
| easily | 66 | 100 | 65 | 85 96,583 competing apps Median installs: 32,526 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 10,194 major competitor apps |
| personal | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 60,197 competing apps Median installs: 33,210 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 6,497 major competitor apps |
| performance | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 20,995 competing apps Median installs: 19,402 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,705 major competitor apps |
| continuously | 72 | 100 | 45 | 64 5,891 competing apps Median installs: 30,915 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 605 major competitor apps |
| check | 67 | 100 | 65 | 82 60,031 competing apps Median installs: 36,479 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 7,081 major competitor apps |
| every | 65 | 100 | 62 | 87 125,665 competing apps Median installs: 38,364 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 16,037 major competitor apps |
| personalized | 70 | 100 | 60 | 76 28,852 competing apps Median installs: 31,583 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 3,359 major competitor apps |
| keep | 67 | 100 | 67 | 84 77,119 competing apps Median installs: 36,853 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 9,784 major competitor apps |
App Description
MEASURE, IMPROVE, OVERCOME
Also for COACHES. Every COACH can testing, manage training load and create personalized workouts for its athletes.
It continuously ADAPTS as the users level changes (ACCESSIBLE FOR EVERYBODY, PROFESSIONAL OR BASIC).
In RIGHTRIDE, individual training load is based on a test sequence, independently and easily performed by the athletes.
After performing RIGHTRIDE TEST* a medium/long term AUTOMATIC training plan is calculated based on individual physiological data from testing. Optimal protocol provides periodic check (called SET UP**) of ratio training load/performances. (*RIGHTRIDE TEST, 1', 3', 5', 12' performed at max pace possible on the road on a bike with power and/or heart rate, also indoor with power and heart rate, better if climbing at 5/6 % constant grade, ideally with no hairpin bends)(**SET UP, 3' and 5' performed on the road on a bike with power and/or heart rate, also indoors with power and heart rate, optional, every 25 days)
Furthermore, training load is dynamic overtime: it keep updated on performances and total volume really performed thus allowing automatically updating.
This is the introduction of «RELATIVITY THEORY»: correct training load constantly changes depending on the time it is observed.