Tails n' Scales

Developer: Elemental Methods LLC

Category: Sports

3K installs

19 ratings

+1 weekly installs

trend steady

+5 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 74 keywords for Tails n' Scales in Google Play

Developer: Elemental Methods LLC Category: sports Rating: 2.46

Tails n' Scales tracks 74 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 74 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 68.6, difficulty 46.2.

Tails n' Scales (Mississippi Department of Marine Resources)

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 74 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

68.6

Top keyword: collected

Avg difficulty

46.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

collected

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 688
68.1
trip

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 962
67.6
natural

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,101
68.5
electronic

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 875
68.6
area

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,388
70.8

Unranked opportunities

collected

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 688
trip

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Competitors: 962
natural

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 1,101
electronic

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 49.7 • Competitors: 875
area

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 54.1 • Competitors: 1,388

High competition keywords

new

Total apps: 193,474 • Major competitors: 25,823

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.7
time

Total apps: 170,577 • Major competitors: 19,592

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.6
easy

Total apps: 161,730 • Major competitors: 17,537

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.7
best

Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
access

Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	65	100	63	87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	18,001 major competitor apps
new	64	100	66	90 193,474 competing apps Median installs: 42,470 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	25,823 major competitor apps
online	66	100	61	84 80,029 competing apps Median installs: 33,297 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	9,770 major competitor apps
email	69	100	53	77 32,694 competing apps Median installs: 29,240 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,918 major competitor apps
easy	64	100	62	89 161,730 competing apps Median installs: 33,636 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	17,537 major competitor apps
collect	69	100	58	78 37,582 competing apps Median installs: 51,160 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	5,908 major competitor apps
flexibility	71	100	43	62 4,120 competing apps Median installs: 28,476 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	452 major competitor apps
information	66	100	59	86 101,893 competing apps Median installs: 23,675 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	7,805 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
time	64	100	65	89 170,577 competing apps Median installs: 33,133 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	19,592 major competitor apps
available	66	100	66	85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	9,952 major competitor apps
provide	67	100	55	82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	5,453 major competitor apps
goal	71	100	49	72 16,094 competing apps Median installs: 32,556 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,779 major competitor apps
request	71	100	48	72 16,722 competing apps Median installs: 24,376 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,361 major competitor apps
collected	73	100	47	68 9,686 competing apps Median installs: 25,493 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	688 major competitor apps
access	65	100	67	87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	11,667 major competitor apps
trip	73	100	47	68 9,036 competing apps Median installs: 27,982 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	962 major competitor apps
area	72	100	54	71 13,871 competing apps Median installs: 28,178 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	1,388 major competitor apps
register	71	100	47	72 17,062 competing apps Median installs: 29,294 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	1,545 major competitor apps
location	70	100	61	76 28,943 competing apps Median installs: 31,126 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	3,077 major competitor apps
quick	68	100	62	81 53,200 competing apps Median installs: 33,498 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	6,079 major competitor apps
must	69	100	52	77 31,973 competing apps Median installs: 36,460 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,575 major competitor apps
required	70	100	61	75 23,390 competing apps Median installs: 41,967 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,770 major competitor apps
numbers	72	100	51	71 13,431 competing apps Median installs: 35,643 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,499 major competitor apps
data	67	100	65	83 68,455 competing apps Median installs: 26,834 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	6,589 major competitor apps

App Description

Tails n' Scales (Mississippi Department of Marine Resources)

The Mississippi Department of Marine Resources (MDMR) Tails n' Scales app is an electronic reporting system that will be used to record all Red Snapper landings in Mississippi. All captains or owners of recreational and for-hire vessels landing Red Snapper in Mississippi must report their catch.

The purpose of this electronic reporting system is to collect information on all recreational Red Snapper landings in Mississippi to provide fishery managers the best available data to ensure Mississippi anglers the most opportunities and greatest flexibility for fisheries harvest.

Users can also access the system online at www.tailsnscales.org. The goal of this app is to allow for quick and easy reporting.

Anglers will be required to register with their name, email and state vessel registration number or USCG vessel documentation number. Once registered, anglers must request a trip number for any trip on which they intend to target Red Snapper. New trip numbers will not be issued until previous catches are reported.

The required information collected at the end of each trip includes: landing location of vessel, the number of anglers, time spent fishing, the number of Red Snapper harvested and the area fished (natural bottom, rig, or artificial reef).