GI Liver and Emergencies
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 135 keywords for GI Liver and Emergencies in Apple App Store
GI Liver and Emergencies tracks 135 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 135 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 49.1, difficulty 38.0.
Tracked keywords
135
0 ranked • 135 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
49.1
Top keyword: best
Avg difficulty
38.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.9
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,398
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 83.4
take
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,068
- 85.7
access
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,388
- 86.9
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,637
Unranked opportunities
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
take
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,068
access
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,388
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,637
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
every
Total apps: 6,989 • Major competitors: 1,637
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5
best
Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
access
Total apps: 6,181 • Major competitors: 1,388
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
take
Total apps: 4,876 • Major competitors: 1,068
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 59 | 100 | 60 | 86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,398 major competitor apps |
| action | 58 | 100 | 49 | 68 1,033 competing apps Median installs: 300,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| order | 20 | 100 | 61 | 73 1,756 competing apps Median installs: 288,212 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 456 major competitor apps |
| care | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,236 competing apps Median installs: 259,912 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| support | 58 | 100 | 56 | 78 2,741 competing apps Median installs: 233,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 515 major competitor apps |
| interest | 20 | 100 | 55 | 56 291 competing apps Median installs: 263,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| enhance | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,161 competing apps Median installs: 244,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 220 major competitor apps |
| management | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 856 competing apps Median installs: 221,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| created | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 953 competing apps Median installs: 213,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| provide | 58 | 100 | 49 | 73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 293 major competitor apps |
| accessing | 20 | 100 | 38 | 51 183 competing apps Median installs: 335,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 48 major competitor apps |
| among | 58 | 100 | 46 | 62 533 competing apps Median installs: 247,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 116 major competitor apps |
| take | 59 | 100 | 60 | 83 4,876 competing apps Median installs: 260,038 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,068 major competitor apps |
| access | 59 | 100 | 63 | 86 6,181 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,388 major competitor apps |
| format | 57 | 100 | 37 | 53 231 competing apps Median installs: 251,875 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 58 | 100 | 56 | 75 1,969 competing apps Median installs: 280,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 484 major competitor apps |
| around | 58 | 100 | 60 | 78 2,784 competing apps Median installs: 275,088 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 645 major competitor apps |
| smart | 58 | 100 | 55 | 73 1,742 competing apps Median installs: 267,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 384 major competitor apps |
| patient | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 94 competing apps Median installs: 207,600 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| tool | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
App Description
Various emergency departments have thus created customised protocols for managing emergency situation in their setup. These are usually in a printed format and available as a manual. However, they are difficult to update, bulky to access and may be not easily traceable. There is thus a felt need to provide evidence based information in an easily accessible and updatable format to the treating physician at the bedside of the patient. In India, most of the trainee physicians possess smart phones. A smart app which can provide the necessary information for managing common GI emergencies on their finger tips can enhance patient care and as well provide training.4,5 We, at PGIMER Chandigarh, recently designed a GI liver mobile app to provide a decision support tool for managing 15 common GI liver emergencies. It has been made in a user friendly, intuitive, easily navigatable colour coded actionable format. The assessment and management of each emergency is provided under the sections of diagnosis, investigations, severity assessment and management. The contents of this app were deliberated upon by the departmental faculty and were subsequently vetted by national experts.
The utility of it in clinical scenarios was validated by a study conducted among resident doctors (n=42) in PGIMER, Chandigarh found that it enhanced their mean performance scores from 57 to 71 in simulated conditions(p less than 0.001). This app was launched at the midterm ISG meeting in Delhi and is now freely downloadable from the website (www.pgimer.edu.in). The feedback has be