Concentration Grid
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 93 keywords for Concentration Grid in Apple App Store
Concentration Grid tracks 93 keywords (2 keywords rank; 91 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.1, difficulty 41.8, best rank 34.
Tracked keywords
93
2 ranked • 91 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 34 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: competitive
Avg difficulty
41.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.8
competitive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 186
- 68.6
exercise
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 202
- 64.7
calls
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 130
- 64.8
vision
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 85
- 68.7
professionals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 73
Unranked opportunities
competitive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 186
exercise
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 202
calls
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.8 • Competitors: 130
vision
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 85
professionals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 73
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
like
Total apps: 143,203 • Major competitors: 3,240
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
experience
Total apps: 122,490 • Major competitors: 2,155
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
mobile
Total apps: 120,211 • Major competitors: 1,593
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
best
Total apps: 117,438 • Major competitors: 2,620
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| concentration | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,697 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 34 | 34 | 40 major competitor apps |
| grid | 72 | 100 | 40 | 63 5,620 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | 51 | 51 | 97 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 117,438 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,620 major competitor apps |
| sports | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 14,552 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 314 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 52,042 competing apps Median installs: 583 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,181 major competitor apps |
| challenge | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 34,298 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 917 major competitor apps |
| competitive | 73 | 100 | 44 | 66 8,510 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 186 major competitor apps |
| leaderboards | 72 | 100 | 41 | 59 3,450 competing apps Median installs: 1,250 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 123 major competitor apps |
| focus | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 31,005 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 369 major competitor apps |
| exercise | 73 | 100 | 42 | 69 12,612 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 202 major competitor apps |
| experience | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 122,490 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,155 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 85,036 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,597 major competitor apps |
| calls | 73 | 100 | 45 | 65 7,332 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 130 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,548 major competitor apps |
| call | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 20,424 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 326 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 120,211 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,593 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 55,996 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 558 major competitor apps |
| variety | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 39,540 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 845 major competitor apps |
| vision | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 7,432 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 85 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 49,502 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 752 major competitor apps |
| others | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 15,992 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 248 major competitor apps |
| favorite | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 71,663 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,759 major competitor apps |
| skills | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 41,805 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 929 major competitor apps |
App Description
The objective of the grid exercise is to select in sequence each of the numbers (randomly arranged and presented) in the grid. Performance is timed. The challenge is to complete the grid as quickly as possible. The exercise calls for focus and concentration.
The grid exercise has been a long-time favorite of many baseball/softball coaches and players (typically using paper sheets, a pen and a stopwatch).
Coaches/sports performance staff and athletes now can do their mental skills training work (and save paper) by using the Concentration Grid app on their mobile device.
The Concentration Grid app is intended to provide competitive challenge and a fun/entertaining experience that is simple and straightforward ... like the printed paper grid exercise - but more convenient.
Focus. Concentration.
With the Concentration Grid app the level and nature of the challenge can be varied by changing the size of the grid - by selecting the number of rows and columns for the grid.
Grids can be generated in a variety of sizes - from 3 columns/rows to 14 columns/rows. (A grid does not have to have the same number of rows and columns.) More rows/columns, more numbers. More numbers, more time.
Try a 3x3 grid ... a 3x14 grid ... a 7x7 grid ... a 5x10 grid ... a 7x10 grid ... a 10x10 grid .... a 10x12 grid ... a 14x14 grid. You get the idea.
The standard is a 10x10 grid - which a focused grid master should be able to complete in under 4 minutes.
Other benchmarks ...
A 3x3 grid can be completed in about 3 seconds.
A 5x5 grid might be completed in under 15 seconds.
A 7x7 grid can be completed by a master in well under a minute.
A 9x9 grid might be completed in 3 minutes.
Can you complete a 6x6 grid in under 30 seconds?
Smaller grids will call for dexterity and quick vision as well as focus/concentration.
Larger grids will challenge your ability to sustain focus/concentration ... your mental stamina is put to the test.
Challenge yourself with the Concentration Grid app.
Track and measure your improvement as you practice. Then compare your best grid times against teammates and others (against benchmark times and on the leaderboards