Mississippi Trees
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 85 keywords for Mississippi Trees in Apple App Store
Mississippi Trees tracks 85 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 85 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 50.4, difficulty 37.4.
Tracked keywords
85
0 ranked • 85 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
50.4
Top keyword: enjoy
Avg difficulty
37.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 84.3
enjoy
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,198
- 88.4
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,773
- 83.9
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,134
- 83.4
even
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,114
- 73.2
simply
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 356
Unranked opportunities
enjoy
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Competitors: 1,198
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Competitors: 1,773
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Competitors: 1,134
even
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Competitors: 1,114
simply
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.3 • Competitors: 356
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 8,094 • Major competitors: 1,773
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
enjoy
Total apps: 5,338 • Major competitors: 1,198
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
experience
Total apps: 5,154 • Major competitors: 1,134
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
even
Total apps: 4,869 • Major competitors: 1,114
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
including
Total apps: 3,880 • Major competitors: 926
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| enjoy | 59 | 100 | 60 | 84 5,338 competing apps Median installs: 274,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,198 major competitor apps |
| reason | 20 | 100 | 35 | 44 86 competing apps Median installs: 220,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| make | 59 | 100 | 63 | 88 8,094 competing apps Median installs: 266,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,773 major competitor apps |
| experience | 59 | 100 | 59 | 84 5,154 competing apps Median installs: 261,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,134 major competitor apps |
| simply | 58 | 100 | 52 | 73 1,724 competing apps Median installs: 235,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 356 major competitor apps |
| beneficial | 57 | 100 | 27 | 36 39 competing apps Median installs: 161,875 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| service | 58 | 100 | 54 | 75 2,023 competing apps Median installs: 255,675 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 419 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| tree | 57 | 100 | 33 | 46 112 competing apps Median installs: 295,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 24 major competitor apps |
| related | 58 | 100 | 50 | 62 555 competing apps Median installs: 238,975 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| area | 58 | 100 | 44 | 61 510 competing apps Median installs: 271,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| book | 58 | 100 | 55 | 67 933 competing apps Median installs: 252,875 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 225 major competitor apps |
| benefit | 57 | 100 | 46 | 54 235 competing apps Median installs: 297,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 57 major competitor apps |
| part | 58 | 100 | 54 | 69 1,154 competing apps Median installs: 268,538 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 247 major competitor apps |
| second | 57 | 100 | 43 | 58 382 competing apps Median installs: 261,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 78 major competitor apps |
| work | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,084 competing apps Median installs: 265,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| made | 58 | 100 | 55 | 73 1,627 competing apps Median installs: 257,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 361 major competitor apps |
| publication | 56 | 100 | 24 | 35 35 competing apps Median installs: 211,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| identify | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,128 competing apps Median installs: 235,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 207 major competitor apps |
| possible | 58 | 100 | 43 | 64 677 competing apps Median installs: 229,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 127 major competitor apps |
| professional | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,261 competing apps Median installs: 250,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 225 major competitor apps |
| term | 57 | 100 | 43 | 58 357 competing apps Median installs: 257,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 81 major competitor apps |
| often | 57 | 100 | 38 | 56 296 competing apps Median installs: 226,588 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 61 major competitor apps |
| aesthetic | 57 | 100 | 37 | 51 178 competing apps Median installs: 266,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
| name | 58 | 100 | 46 | 64 675 competing apps Median installs: 249,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 141 major competitor apps |
App Description
Trees (forests) represent a huge economic benefit to the state of Mississippi. Forests occupy about 65% of the land area of Mississippi and timber is second only to poultry production in terms of agricultural income in Mississippi. Tree identification is an obvious necessity for those who work in forestry and related fields. For those who simply enjoy the woods for recreational or aesthetic reasons, being able to identify the trees can make the experience even more enjoyable. It is our desire that this book will be beneficial to both the professional and the recreational user.
Tree Names
All known plants, including trees, have a scientific name and usually one or more common names. For example, the scientific name for cherrybark oak is Quercus pagoda Raf.., but cherrybark oak, spanish oak, swamp red oak, are all common names for the same species. For that reason the scientific name is less confusing and far more descriptive. The term pagoda in the scientific name for cherrybark oak denotes the pagoda shape of the outline of the leaves.
The scientific name e.g., Quercus pagoda Raf.., is composed of three parts. The first part is the genus or generic name, the second part is the species or specific epithet, and the third part is the authority or name, often given as an abbreviation, of the person who classified the species and gave it a scientific name.