Teralink

Developer: Teradek

Category: Photo & Video

Add App to Comparison

100 installs

2.00 ratings

2.00 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 39 keywords for Teralink in Apple App Store

Developer: Teradek Category: photo_and_video Rating: 3.5

Teralink tracks 39 keywords (3 keywords rank; 36 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.1, difficulty 42.9, best rank 64.

Tracked keywords

3 ranked • 36 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 64 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.1

Top keyword: combine

Avg difficulty

42.9

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

combine

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 215
64.8
higher

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 206
67.0
bit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 102
63.0
usage

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 141
66.4
server

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 90
63.3

Unranked opportunities

combine

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 215
higher

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 206
bit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 102
usage

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 141
server

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 90

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 189,921 • Major competitors: 2,981

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
share

Total apps: 123,144 • Major competitors: 1,809

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.8
data

Total apps: 97,664 • Major competitors: 1,018

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
allows

Total apps: 80,163 • Major competitors: 663

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
multiple

Total apps: 76,366 • Major competitors: 1,126

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
bandwidth	70	100	32	50 968 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.0	67	64	25 major competitor apps
latency	70	100	33	49 900 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.0	106	106	24 major competitor apps
connectivity	72	100	37	59 3,620 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.9	193	163	37 major competitor apps
share	66	100	55	85 123,144 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,809 major competitor apps
data usage	69	100	31	46 568 competing apps Median installs: 882 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	22 major competitor apps
live	68	100	52	80 66,906 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,177 major competitor apps
reliable	71	100	46	72 20,653 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	208 major competitor apps
connection	70	100	46	74 28,276 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	424 major competitor apps
time	65	100	55	88 189,921 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,981 major competitor apps
connect	68	100	51	80 67,327 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	953 major competitor apps
rate	71	100	45	72 21,518 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	309 major competitor apps
multiple	68	100	51	81 76,366 competing apps Median installs: 504 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,126 major competitor apps
combine	73	100	42	65 7,933 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	215 major competitor apps
speed	70	100	47	74 28,421 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	515 major competitor apps
monitor	70	100	46	75 34,229 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	376 major competitor apps
brings	71	100	46	73 25,232 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	375 major competitor apps
quality	68	100	50	79 58,822 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	786 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	50	82 80,163 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	663 major competitor apps
network	71	100	47	74 26,929 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	420 major competitor apps
higher	73	100	42	67 10,659 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	206 major competitor apps
bit	73	100	40	63 6,127 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	102 major competitor apps
go	69	100	51	78 52,118 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,114 major competitor apps
professional	69	100	48	78 49,624 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	519 major competitor apps
data	67	100	52	83 97,664 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,018 major competitor apps
iphone	69	100	48	77 42,139 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	691 major competitor apps

App Description

Teralink brings professional “bonding” technology to the Cube 600 series. When enabled, it allows you to combine bandwidth from multiple network interfaces to increase your uplink speed for more reliable and higher quality streaming. That means you can go live with up to 6 data connections at once from Ethernet, Wifi, and iPhone LTE sources.

- Configure your Cube 605 or 655 to connect with your Sputnik server and Core account.
- Share your LTE connection with Cube for a more resilient, higher bit rate broadcast
- Monitor your data usage in real-time