AEA
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 31 keywords for AEA in Apple App Store
AEA tracks 31 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 31 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 33.8, difficulty 23.4.
Tracked keywords
31
0 ranked • 31 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
33.8
Top keyword: sempre
Avg difficulty
23.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 24.4
sempre
Opportunity: 61.0 • Difficulty: 15.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1
- 78.1
multiple
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 550
- 70.9
ai
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 284
- 69.6
per
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 246
- 54.3
fine
Opportunity: 57.0 • Difficulty: 36.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 36
Unranked opportunities
sempre
Opportunity: 61.0 • Difficulty: 15.5 • Competitors: 1
multiple
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.5 • Competitors: 550
ai
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.8 • Competitors: 284
per
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 48.2 • Competitors: 246
fine
Opportunity: 57.0 • Difficulty: 36.5 • Competitors: 36
High competition keywords
multiple
Total apps: 2,846 • Major competitors: 550
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
ai
Total apps: 1,363 • Major competitors: 284
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8
per
Total apps: 1,201 • Major competitors: 246
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.2
fine
Total apps: 251 • Major competitors: 36
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 36.5
la
Total apps: 216 • Major competitors: 44
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 38.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fine | 57 | 100 | 36 | 54 251 competing apps Median installs: 203,500 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| la | 57 | 100 | 38 | 53 216 competing apps Median installs: 262,288 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,846 competing apps Median installs: 239,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| le | 57 | 100 | 27 | 38 47 competing apps Median installs: 234,150 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| ai | 58 | 100 | 53 | 71 1,363 competing apps Median installs: 253,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 284 major competitor apps |
| al | 57 | 100 | 32 | 48 131 competing apps Median installs: 218,075 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| il | 0 | 56 | 16 | 20 7 competing apps Median installs: 171,975 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| per | 58 | 100 | 48 | 70 1,201 competing apps Median installs: 242,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 246 major competitor apps |
| con | 57 | 100 | 31 | 47 117 competing apps Median installs: 228,400 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 17 major competitor apps |
| vi | 56 | 100 | 23 | 30 20 competing apps Median installs: 329,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| gestione | 0 | 9 | 38 | 7 1 competing apps Median installs: 8,407,200 Avg rating: 4.8 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| una | 57 | 100 | 27 | 41 67 competing apps Median installs: 221,725 Avg rating: 4.8 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| non | 57 | 100 | 24 | 36 37 competing apps Median installs: 157,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| del | 57 | 100 | 30 | 42 74 competing apps Median installs: 213,375 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| di | 56 | 96 | 25 | 26 13 competing apps Median installs: 200,500 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| un | 57 | 100 | 27 | 41 64 competing apps Median installs: 194,088 Avg rating: 4.8 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| dei | 0 | 9 | 5 | 7 1 competing apps Median installs: 138,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| ogni | 0 | 9 | 5 | 7 1 competing apps Median installs: 138,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| st | 57 | 100 | 38 | 50 168 competing apps Median installs: 227,612 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 29 major competitor apps |
| sia | 0 | 26 | 15 | 14 3 competing apps Median installs: 1,676,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| alla | 0 | 18 | 7 | 11 2 competing apps Median installs: 110,462 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| si | 56 | 100 | 23 | 34 30 competing apps Median installs: 194,088 Avg rating: 4.8 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| mondo | 0 | 9 | 5 | 7 1 competing apps Median installs: 138,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| panel | 20 | 100 | 31 | 40 57 competing apps Median installs: 245,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 15 major competitor apps |
| sempre | 61 | 83 | 16 | 24 11 competing apps Median installs: 83,375 Avg rating: 4.8 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
App Description
Pertanto, vi è necessità di orientamento clinico per quanto riguarda questa sottopopolazione di pazienti con SCA in rapida crescita, considerando anche il fatto che le decisioni sulle strategie ottimali nella terapia antitrombotica dell’anziano sono spesso difficili e complesse, anche in relazione alla presenza di disfunzioni d’organo legate all’età, di frequenti comorbilità e di multiple terapie concomitanti, ed infine all’aumento del rischio sia ischemico sia emorragico nel paziente anziano. Un panel di esperti cardiologi si è radunato sotto l’egida della Società Italiana di Cardiologia Interventistica (SICI-GISE) per discutere l’argomento e sviluppare un documento di consenso, al fine di fornire raccomandazioni pratiche al cardiologo clinico ed interventista sulla gestione ottimale della terapia antitrombotica nei pazienti con SCA di età >=75 anni.
In questo app dopo aver chiesto i dati pertinenti, vengono presentati e discussi vari scenari clinici di pazienti con infarto miocardico acuto con o senza sopraslivellamento del tratto ST e angina instabile, inclusi casi particolari (es. pazienti di età >=85 anni, pazienti nefropatici o con pregressi accidenti cerebrovascolari, pazienti che necessitano di triplice terapia o terapia antitrombotica a lungo termine), fornendo le raccomandazioni del Panel per ogni singolo scenario.