FoalScore

Developer: Ohio State University

Category: Education

Add App to Comparison

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 33 keywords for FoalScore in Apple App Store

Developer: Ohio State University Category: education Rating: 3.14

FoalScore tracks 33 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 33 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 39.6.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 33 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.8

Top keyword: university

Avg difficulty

39.6

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 28
64.1
calculate

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 89
68.0
determine

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 71
63.9
allows users

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 15
62.5
survival

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 109
61.8

Unranked opportunities

university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 28
calculate

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 89
determine

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 71
allows users

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.7 • Competitors: 15
survival

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 109

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 130,038 • Major competitors: 1,614

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
share

Total apps: 123,191 • Major competitors: 1,807

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
information

Total apps: 121,651 • Major competitors: 1,140

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
allows

Total apps: 80,121 • Major competitors: 658

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
based

Total apps: 79,282 • Major competitors: 1,049

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
survival	72	100	40	62 5,213 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	109 major competitor apps
share	66	100	55	85 123,191 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,807 major competitor apps
users	68	100	50	80 60,489 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	672 major competitor apps
information	66	100	52	85 121,651 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,140 major competitor apps
used	69	100	49	78 50,510 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	496 major competitor apps
mobile	66	100	53	85 130,038 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,614 major competitor apps
store	69	100	51	77 44,807 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	910 major competitor apps
university	73	100	40	64 7,173 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	28 major competitor apps
researchers	70	100	30	50 1,031 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	11 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	50	82 80,121 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	658 major competitor apps
work	68	100	50	80 61,424 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	879 major competitor apps
enter	71	100	46	73 23,924 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	393 major competitor apps
calculate	73	100	42	68 12,281 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	89 major competitor apps
probability	70	100	31	51 1,094 competing apps Median installs: 514 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	7 major competitor apps
based	67	100	51	81 79,282 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,049 major competitor apps
developed	71	100	44	72 21,257 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	138 major competitor apps
scoring	72	100	38	61 4,552 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	75 major competitor apps
results	71	100	44	72 21,421 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	220 major competitor apps
sick	70	100	33	52 1,252 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	17 major competitor apps
blood	72	100	38	61 4,965 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	69 major competitor apps
determine	73	100	39	64 6,977 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	71 major competitor apps
published	72	100	37	61 4,589 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	35 major competitor apps
state	72	100	43	69 14,376 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	160 major competitor apps
allows users	73	100	38	63 5,744 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	15 major competitor apps
vital	72	100	38	60 4,314 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	44 major competitor apps

App Description

The Ohio State University researchers Drs. Ramiro Toribio and Katarzyna Dembek have developed a mobile application – FoalScore – to be used by veterinarians to determine the probability of survival and sepsis in sick newborn foals. FoalScore allows veterinarians to enter the foal vital signs and blood work information to calculate likelihood of sepsis and survival, based on the published foal sepsis and survival scores. The application also allows users to store and share results from both scoring methods.