FoalScore

Developer: Ohio State University

Category: Education

Add App to Comparison

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 33 keywords for FoalScore in Apple App Store

Developer: Ohio State University Category: education

FoalScore tracks 33 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 33 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.7, difficulty 38.4.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 33 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.7

Top keyword: university

Avg difficulty

38.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 12
64.0
calculate

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 49
67.7
determine

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 37
64.4
survival

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 69
61.8
scoring

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 56
60.5

Unranked opportunities

university

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 12
calculate

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 49
determine

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 37
survival

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 37.5 • Competitors: 69
scoring

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.7 • Competitors: 56

High competition keywords

mobile

Total apps: 119,675 • Major competitors: 988

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
share

Total apps: 113,165 • Major competitors: 1,118

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
information

Total apps: 111,902 • Major competitors: 689

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
allows

Total apps: 80,615 • Major competitors: 356

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.4
based

Total apps: 80,160 • Major competitors: 689

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
survival	72	100	37	62 4,942 competing apps Median installs: 275 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	69 major competitor apps
share	66	100	51	85 113,165 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,118 major competitor apps
users	68	100	48	80 61,052 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	447 major competitor apps
information	66	100	51	85 111,902 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	689 major competitor apps
used	68	100	48	79 50,849 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	307 major competitor apps
mobile	66	100	51	85 119,675 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	988 major competitor apps
store	69	100	47	77 40,933 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	569 major competitor apps
university	73	100	39	64 6,658 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	12 major competitor apps
researchers	70	100	30	51 1,042 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	7 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	49	82 80,615 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	356 major competitor apps
work	68	100	48	79 55,760 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	535 major competitor apps
enter	71	100	45	73 24,120 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	241 major competitor apps
calculate	73	100	41	68 11,112 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	49 major competitor apps
probability	70	100	30	50 991 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	7 major competitor apps
based	67	100	50	82 80,160 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	689 major competitor apps
developed	71	100	44	72 21,418 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	86 major competitor apps
scoring	72	100	37	61 4,129 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	56 major competitor apps
results	71	100	44	73 21,677 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	137 major competitor apps
sick	70	100	31	51 1,164 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	9 major competitor apps
blood	72	100	37	61 4,617 competing apps Median installs: 175 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	42 major competitor apps
determine	73	100	39	64 7,038 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	37 major competitor apps
published	72	100	37	61 4,614 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	19 major competitor apps
state	72	100	42	69 13,063 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	106 major competitor apps
allows users	72	100	38	63 5,777 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	12 major competitor apps
vital	72	100	36	60 3,897 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	30 major competitor apps

App Description

The Ohio State University researchers Drs. Ramiro Toribio and Katarzyna Dembek have developed a mobile application – FoalScore – to be used by veterinarians to determine the probability of survival and sepsis in sick newborn foals. FoalScore allows veterinarians to enter the foal vital signs and blood work information to calculate likelihood of sepsis and survival, based on the published foal sepsis and survival scores. The application also allows users to store and share results from both scoring methods.