FoalScore

Developer: Ohio State University

Category: Education

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 33 keywords for FoalScore in Apple App Store

Developer: Ohio State University Category: education

FoalScore tracks 33 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 33 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 47.0, difficulty 39.1.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 33 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

47.0

Top keyword: share

Avg difficulty

39.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

share

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 62.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 916
82.3
users

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 430
74.6
information

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 572
77.6
used

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 279
71.8
mobile

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 60.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 846
81.3

Unranked opportunities

share

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 62.6 • Competitors: 916
users

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Competitors: 430
information

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Competitors: 572
used

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 279
mobile

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 60.2 • Competitors: 846

High competition keywords

share

Total apps: 4,336 • Major competitors: 916

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
mobile

Total apps: 3,947 • Major competitors: 846

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.2
based

Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
information

Total apps: 2,704 • Major competitors: 572

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.9
allows

Total apps: 2,119 • Major competitors: 351

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
survival	57	100	38	57 315 competing apps Median installs: 212,225 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	57 major competitor apps
share	58	100	63	82 4,336 competing apps Median installs: 258,138 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	916 major competitor apps
users	58	100	52	75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	430 major competitor apps
information	58	100	57	78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	572 major competitor apps
used	58	100	53	72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	279 major competitor apps
mobile	58	100	60	81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	846 major competitor apps
store	58	100	59	75 2,016 competing apps Median installs: 285,588 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	477 major competitor apps
university	57	100	31	41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	11 major competitor apps
researchers	56	100	24	32 26 competing apps Median installs: 341,950 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	6 major competitor apps
allows	58	100	50	75 2,119 competing apps Median installs: 225,625 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	351 major competitor apps
work	58	100	53	75 2,084 competing apps Median installs: 265,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	452 major competitor apps
enter	58	100	51	67 943 competing apps Median installs: 278,125 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	220 major competitor apps
calculate	57	100	39	52 203 competing apps Median installs: 194,625 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	41 major competitor apps
probability	56	100	28	35 36 competing apps Median installs: 213,050 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	3 major competitor apps
based	58	100	58	79 3,039 competing apps Median installs: 256,925 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	697 major competitor apps
developed	58	100	41	60 460 competing apps Median installs: 233,638 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	74 major competitor apps
scoring	20	100	38	51 175 competing apps Median installs: 349,750 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	47 major competitor apps
results	58	100	43	64 668 competing apps Median installs: 213,000 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	120 major competitor apps
sick	57	100	29	38 48 competing apps Median installs: 220,212 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	9 major competitor apps
blood	57	100	36	53 218 competing apps Median installs: 188,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	37 major competitor apps
determine	57	100	38	53 223 competing apps Median installs: 252,950 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	43 major competitor apps
published	57	100	32	47 119 competing apps Median installs: 228,500 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	20 major competitor apps
state	57	100	43	58 365 competing apps Median installs: 263,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	85 major competitor apps
allows users	57	100	29	42 69 competing apps Median installs: 214,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	12 major competitor apps
vital	57	100	37	47 117 competing apps Median installs: 161,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	25 major competitor apps

App Description

The Ohio State University researchers Drs. Ramiro Toribio and Katarzyna Dembek have developed a mobile application – FoalScore – to be used by veterinarians to determine the probability of survival and sepsis in sick newborn foals. FoalScore allows veterinarians to enter the foal vital signs and blood work information to calculate likelihood of sepsis and survival, based on the published foal sepsis and survival scores. The application also allows users to store and share results from both scoring methods.