Focus / DOF hyperfocal calculator depth of field
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 106 keywords for Focus / DOF hyperfocal calculator depth of field in Apple App Store
Focus / DOF hyperfocal calculator depth of field tracks 106 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 105 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 40.4, best rank 71.
Tracked keywords
106
1 ranked • 105 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 71 • Latest leader 79
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: depth
Avg difficulty
40.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.1
depth
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank 79
Competitors: 192
- 64.5
simulation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 185
- 67.9
suggestions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 144
- 63.1
minimal
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 50
- 66.1
objects
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 226
Unranked opportunities
simulation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 185
suggestions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Competitors: 144
minimal
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 50
objects
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 226
object
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 131
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 182,399 • Major competitors: 3,804
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
find
Total apps: 149,879 • Major competitors: 2,796
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
best
Total apps: 124,558 • Major competitors: 2,643
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
view
Total apps: 108,061 • Major competitors: 1,317
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
perfect
Total apps: 100,562 • Major competitors: 1,622
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| depth | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 12,471 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | 79 | 71 | 192 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 124,558 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,643 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 182,399 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,804 major competitor apps |
| simulation | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,603 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 185 major competitor apps |
| focus | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 35,319 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 375 major competitor apps |
| mode | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 38,011 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 676 major competitor apps |
| try | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 43,238 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 951 major competitor apps |
| sensor | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,377 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,553 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 504 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 149,879 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,796 major competitor apps |
| write | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 16,684 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 213 major competitor apps |
| perfect | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 100,562 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,622 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 67,637 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,399 major competitor apps |
| function | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,731 competing apps Median installs: 351 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 159 major competitor apps |
| small | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 25,838 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 356 major competitor apps |
| smart | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 58,315 competing apps Median installs: 484 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| view | 67 | 100 | 52 | 84 108,061 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,317 major competitor apps |
| suggestions | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 12,111 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 144 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 72,986 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,491 major competitor apps |
| closest | 72 | 100 | 38 | 58 3,125 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 75 major competitor apps |
| want | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 83,387 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,442 major competitor apps |
| always | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 52,544 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,022 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,360 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 240 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 61,417 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 881 major competitor apps |
| much | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 53,406 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 932 major competitor apps |
App Description
Use this depth of field and circle of confusion calculator to simulate the out of focus blur, depth of field and hyperfocal distance for different camera configurations, including the diffraction effect for small apertures. The blur values are measured in the pixels of the camera sensor. The blur simulation shows how much the infinity and the object will be blurred as seen on a 25 cm or 10 inch printout or screen.
You can tap on the magnifying glass to switch between full frame view, to asses the size of objects, and 1/10 of the frame view, where you can evaluate the blur.
The parameters are: *Distance* - distance to the object, *Lens type* - focal length, *F-number* - aperture setting, *Focus distance* - distance the lens is focused at, *Sensor* - the megapixel count of the matrix and the camera sensor size.
You can use the *HYPERFOCAL* mode to set the focus value to the hyperfocal distance for the current F value.
If you want to have both the object and the infinity in focus, use *AUTO HYPERFOCAL* mode, it will find the minimal F and the corresponding focus value. *AUTO HYPERFOCAL* will try to achieve the best possible result, but due to the diffraction effect of small apertures it's not always possible to get a sharp image, the simulation will reflect this.
The last smart function is *MAX BLUR FOCUS* - given an object distance and F-value it will suggest the closest focus value which will keep the object still in focus, while achieving maximum blur for the background. The idea is somewhat opposite of the hyperfocal shooting - here your focus point lies between the camera and the object with the depth of field ending on the object plane, ensuring the maximum possible blur for the background at your given F value. This works well if you are forced to use a relatively high F number, but there are no other objects in the view which are closer than the target.
The standard *circle of confusion* used for DoF, smart focus and max blur calculations is the sensor diagonal divided by *1730*, which is the so called Zeiss formula.
If you have any questions, suggestions or spotted an error, please don't hesitate to write to us: support@strelka.hk