Focus / DOF hyperfocal calculator depth of field
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 106 keywords for Focus / DOF hyperfocal calculator depth of field in Apple App Store
Focus / DOF hyperfocal calculator depth of field tracks 106 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 105 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 53.8, difficulty 39.8, best rank 81.
Tracked keywords
106
1 ranked • 105 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 81 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
53.8
Top keyword: best
Avg difficulty
39.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.9
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,398
- 91.1
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,341
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 60.9
depth
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Rank 81
Competitors: 106
- 59.5
simulation
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 84
Unranked opportunities
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Competitors: 2,341
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
simulation
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 84
focus
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 179
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 10,701 • Major competitors: 2,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
best
Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
keep
Total apps: 4,577 • Major competitors: 1,017
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.0
different
Total apps: 4,440 • Major competitors: 823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| depth | 58 | 100 | 44 | 61 494 competing apps Median installs: 241,712 Avg rating: 4.6 | 81 | 81 | 106 major competitor apps |
| best | 59 | 100 | 60 | 86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,398 major competitor apps |
| new | 59 | 100 | 64 | 91 10,701 competing apps Median installs: 270,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| simulation | 58 | 100 | 40 | 60 427 competing apps Median installs: 281,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
| focus | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 906 competing apps Median installs: 231,512 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 179 major competitor apps |
| mode | 58 | 100 | 51 | 73 1,632 competing apps Median installs: 249,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 350 major competitor apps |
| try | 58 | 100 | 53 | 76 2,347 competing apps Median installs: 264,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 496 major competitor apps |
| sensor | 57 | 100 | 28 | 42 71 competing apps Median installs: 162,650 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| write | 58 | 100 | 43 | 61 515 competing apps Median installs: 240,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| perfect | 58 | 100 | 56 | 81 3,777 competing apps Median installs: 270,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 813 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| function | 57 | 100 | 38 | 58 375 competing apps Median installs: 210,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| small | 58 | 100 | 51 | 66 862 competing apps Median installs: 228,538 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 155 major competitor apps |
| smart | 58 | 100 | 55 | 73 1,742 competing apps Median installs: 267,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 384 major competitor apps |
| view | 58 | 100 | 60 | 79 3,121 competing apps Median installs: 254,100 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
| suggestions | 58 | 100 | 44 | 60 443 competing apps Median installs: 233,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 83 major competitor apps |
| current | 58 | 100 | 56 | 81 3,863 competing apps Median installs: 255,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 756 major competitor apps |
| closest | 57 | 100 | 45 | 52 199 competing apps Median installs: 261,625 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| want | 58 | 100 | 58 | 82 4,034 competing apps Median installs: 255,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 840 major competitor apps |
| always | 58 | 100 | 56 | 78 2,705 competing apps Median installs: 275,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 630 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 58 | 100 | 44 | 64 697 competing apps Median installs: 225,025 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| work | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,084 competing apps Median installs: 265,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 452 major competitor apps |
| much | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,669 competing apps Median installs: 241,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 569 major competitor apps |
App Description
Use this depth of field and circle of confusion calculator to simulate the out of focus blur, depth of field and hyperfocal distance for different camera configurations, including the diffraction effect for small apertures. The blur values are measured in the pixels of the camera sensor. The blur simulation shows how much the infinity and the object will be blurred as seen on a 25 cm or 10 inch printout or screen.
You can tap on the magnifying glass to switch between full frame view, to asses the size of objects, and 1/10 of the frame view, where you can evaluate the blur.
The parameters are: *Distance* - distance to the object, *Lens type* - focal length, *F-number* - aperture setting, *Focus distance* - distance the lens is focused at, *Sensor* - the megapixel count of the matrix and the camera sensor size.
You can use the *HYPERFOCAL* mode to set the focus value to the hyperfocal distance for the current F value.
If you want to have both the object and the infinity in focus, use *AUTO HYPERFOCAL* mode, it will find the minimal F and the corresponding focus value. *AUTO HYPERFOCAL* will try to achieve the best possible result, but due to the diffraction effect of small apertures it's not always possible to get a sharp image, the simulation will reflect this.
The last smart function is *MAX BLUR FOCUS* - given an object distance and F-value it will suggest the closest focus value which will keep the object still in focus, while achieving maximum blur for the background. The idea is somewhat opposite of the hyperfocal shooting - here your focus point lies between the camera and the object with the depth of field ending on the object plane, ensuring the maximum possible blur for the background at your given F value. This works well if you are forced to use a relatively high F number, but there are no other objects in the view which are closer than the target.
The standard *circle of confusion* used for DoF, smart focus and max blur calculations is the sensor diagonal divided by *1730*, which is the so called Zeiss formula.
If you have any questions, suggestions or spotted an error, please don't hesitate to write to us: support@strelka.hk