Lepidopteran Families

~50 - 100
1.00 ratings
Lepidopteran Families icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 109 keywords for Lepidopteran Families in Apple App Store

Developer: LucidMobile Category: books_and_reference Rating: 1

Lepidopteran Families tracks 109 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 109 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 37.1.

Tracked keywords

109

0  ranked •  109  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.9

Top keyword: strategy

Avg difficulty

37.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • strategy

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 208

    68.5
  • assist

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 46

    66.4
  • chosen

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —

    Competitors: 62

    64.7
  • taken

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —

    Competitors: 30

    65.1
  • high quality

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 76

    67.2

Unranked opportunities

  • strategy

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 208

  • assist

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 46

  • chosen

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 62

  • taken

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 30

  • high quality

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 76

High competition keywords

  • like

    Total apps: 140,190 • Major competitors: 1,775

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3

  • mobile

    Total apps: 117,282 • Major competitors: 771

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3

  • using

    Total apps: 116,658 • Major competitors: 765

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3

  • create

    Total apps: 115,763 • Major competitors: 1,191

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4

  • features

    Total apps: 113,448 • Major competitors: 1,070

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
strategy731004268

12,170 competing apps

Median installs: 125

Avg rating: 4.2

208

major competitor apps

health691004677

38,128 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.2

293

major competitor apps

single691004676

36,275 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.1

306

major competitor apps

version701004575

29,193 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.0

180

major competitor apps

sheet711003456

2,301 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.0

15

major competitor apps

images701004575

28,790 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.0

167

major competitor apps

range691004677

37,302 competing apps

Median installs: 25

Avg rating: 4.1

273

major competitor apps

curated721004269

12,887 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.4

125

major competitor apps

digital691004778

45,148 competing apps

Median installs: 25

Avg rating: 4.2

332

major competitor apps

information661005185

110,448 competing apps

Median installs: 25

Avg rating: 4.1

537

major competitor apps

used681004879

51,134 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.0

235

major competitor apps

manage671005083

92,206 competing apps

Median installs: 25

Avg rating: 4.2

743

major competitor apps

created701004574

26,821 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.1

134

major competitor apps

avoid721004371

17,568 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.1

179

major competitor apps

using661005185

116,658 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.0

765

major competitor apps

mobile661005185

117,282 competing apps

Median installs: 25

Avg rating: 4.0

771

major competitor apps

key691004777

41,571 competing apps

Median installs: 25

Avg rating: 4.2

268

major competitor apps

diagnostic711003355

2,047 competing apps

Median installs: 25

Avg rating: 4.0

2

major competitor apps

create661005185

115,763 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.2

1,191

major competitor apps

many671004982

77,810 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.1

674

major competitor apps

provides671004982

73,576 competing apps

Median installs: 25

Avg rating: 4.1

257

major competitor apps

tools691004677

37,575 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.2

312

major competitor apps

quality681004879

51,848 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.1

377

major competitor apps

would like721003863

5,744 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.0

62

major competitor apps

easily671005083

87,008 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.1

617

major competitor apps

109 keywords
1 of 5

App Description

An interactive lucid key is presented to assist in recognising families of targeted Lepidoptera of biosecurity concern using morphological characters of the adult. Many existing keys to adult Lepidoptera lack good illustrations of the important characters and this key provides high quality photographs of all the characters used. Easily identifiable features that are visible on set specimens using a stereomicroscope have been chosen in an attempt to avoid where possible, the type of characters requiring manipulation or dissection of the specimen for example, wing venation, apodemes and genitalia.

The range of families included in the key encompasses those exotic species identified by Plant Health Australia (2012), Department of Agriculture (Northern Australia Quarantine Strategy) (2013) and the National Plant Biosecurity Strategy Diagnostic Network (2013). The key has been adapted from Nielsen et al. (1991), Kristensen (1999) and Holloway et al. (1987). Diagnoses were evaluated using data from Bradley (1986), Common (1990), Holloway (2011), Kyrki (1984), Landry (2003), Miller (1991), Nielsen et al. (1996), Solis (2007) and Zborowski et al. (2007).

Diagnostic images were taken by S. Anderson and Y. Luo, and were prepared from curated specimens, using LEICA DC300 digital camera and Leica DC Twain® version 5.1.10 software. Numerous photographs of each specimen were taken at differing focal planes and these were montaged using Automontage Essentials® 5.020096 ES to produce a single image. Images were taken at 2592 x 1944 resolution and saved in TIFF format.

The authors would like to thank Ted Edwards for his extensive lepidopteran expertise, Matt Taylor, James Walker, John Nielsen, Len Willan, David Britton, Thomas Wallenius, You Ning Su, and Luke Halling.

How to cite this key

Anderson SJ, Luo YY & Bellis GA (2017). Lepidopteran Families of Biosecurity Concern. Interactive Lucid Key. Northern Australian Quarantine Strategy, Department of Agriculture

Software used

Lucid v3.6 was used to construct and manage the identification key.

Fact Sheet Fusion v2 was used to manage the images and data and create fact sheets for both the web and mobile application.

The app was created using the Lucid Mobile Platform.

For more information on these tools please visit: http://www.lucidcentral.org