MESA Risk Score

~550 - 1.1K
11 ratings
MESA Risk Score icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 89 keywords for MESA Risk Score in Apple App Store

Developer: Johns Hopkins Mobile medicine Category: medical Rating: 2.45

MESA Risk Score tracks 89 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 89 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 47.8, difficulty 36.3.

Tracked keywords

89

0  ranked •  89  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

47.8

Top keyword: help

Avg difficulty

36.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • help

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,236

    85.2
  • every

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,637

    86.9
  • care

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Rank —

    Competitors: 262

    69.9
  • place

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.0 • Rank —

    Competitors: 371

    73.0
  • used

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 279

    71.8

Unranked opportunities

  • help

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236

  • every

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,637

  • care

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Competitors: 262

  • place

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.0 • Competitors: 371

  • used

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 279

High competition keywords

  • every

    Total apps: 6,989 • Major competitors: 1,637

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5

  • help

    Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1

  • based

    Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7

  • across

    Total apps: 2,646 • Major competitors: 672

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6

  • first

    Total apps: 2,569 • Major competitors: 528

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
care581004970

1,236 competing apps

Median installs: 259,912

Avg rating: 4.6

262

major competitor apps

place581005473

1,689 competing apps

Median installs: 247,300

Avg rating: 4.6

371

major competitor apps

used581005372

1,494 competing apps

Median installs: 237,800

Avg rating: 4.6

279

major competitor apps

women571003652

200 competing apps

Median installs: 225,512

Avg rating: 4.6

46

major competitor apps

help591006185

5,873 competing apps

Median installs: 257,100

Avg rating: 4.6

1,236

major competitor apps

score201005268

977 competing apps

Median installs: 314,100

Avg rating: 4.7

264

major competitor apps

exam571003047

122 competing apps

Median installs: 159,862

Avg rating: 4.7

10

major competitor apps

patient571003045

94 competing apps

Median installs: 207,600

Avg rating: 4.7

14

major competitor apps

researchers561002432

26 competing apps

Median installs: 341,950

Avg rating: 4.7

6

major competitor apps

tool581004769

1,134 competing apps

Median installs: 210,275

Avg rating: 4.6

170

major competitor apps

discussion561003535

34 competing apps

Median installs: 192,038

Avg rating: 4.6

7

major competitor apps

every591006287

6,989 competing apps

Median installs: 280,925

Avg rating: 4.6

1,637

major competitor apps

guide581004767

875 competing apps

Median installs: 227,525

Avg rating: 4.7

161

major competitor apps

across201006377

2,646 competing apps

Median installs: 290,838

Avg rating: 4.6

672

major competitor apps

pressure571003854

253 competing apps

Median installs: 218,975

Avg rating: 4.6

56

major competitor apps

two581004970

1,253 competing apps

Median installs: 238,750

Avg rating: 4.6

249

major competitor apps

detected571002941

62 competing apps

Median installs: 151,750

Avg rating: 4.5

13

major competitor apps

provided581004561

515 competing apps

Median installs: 271,325

Avg rating: 4.6

109

major competitor apps

data581005577

2,494 competing apps

Median installs: 237,338

Avg rating: 4.6

472

major competitor apps

sample571003642

74 competing apps

Median installs: 235,662

Avg rating: 4.6

11

major competitor apps

field571003753

228 competing apps

Median installs: 225,675

Avg rating: 4.6

49

major competitor apps

participants201003739

50 competing apps

Median installs: 276,750

Avg rating: 4.7

13

major competitor apps

md56761824

10 competing apps

Median installs: 144,988

Avg rating: 4.6

1

major competitor apps

final571003855

274 competing apps

Median installs: 241,688

Avg rating: 4.6

50

major competitor apps

based581005879

3,039 competing apps

Median installs: 256,925

Avg rating: 4.6

697

major competitor apps

89 keywords
1 of 4

App Description

The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) is a study of the characteristics of subclinical cardiovascular disease (disease detected non-invasively before it has produced clinical signs and symptoms) and the risk factors that predict progression to clinically overt cardiovascular disease or progression of the subclinical disease. MESA researchers study a diverse, population-based sample of 6,814 asymptomatic men and women aged 45-84 from six field centers across the United States. Approximately 38 percent of the recruited participants are white, 28 percent African-American, 22 percent Hispanic, and 12 percent Asian, predominantly of Chinese descent. The first examination took place over two years, from July 2000-July 2002. It was followed by three examination periods that were 17-20 months in length, and a fifth exam April 2010 – January 2012. Participants are contacted every 9 to 12 months throughout the study to assess clinical morbidity and mortality. The final 18 months of the study are dedicated to close out and data analysis and publication.

The MESA CHD Risk Score is the first risk scoring tool to incorporate coronary artery calcium scores. The MESA CHD Risk Score can be used to help guide the intensity of preventive therapies such as diet, exercise, aspirin, blood pressure and cholesterol therapies.

The results and recommendations provided by this application are intended to inform but do not replace clinical judgement. Therapeutic options should be individualized and determined after discussion between the patient and their care provider.

This app was developed under the direction of the MESA Executive Committee by Ted W. James, MD