MESA Risk Score
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 89 keywords for MESA Risk Score in Apple App Store
MESA Risk Score tracks 89 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 89 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 47.8, difficulty 36.3.
Tracked keywords
89
0 ranked • 89 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
47.8
Top keyword: help
Avg difficulty
36.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.2
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,236
- 86.9
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,637
- 69.9
care
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 262
- 73.0
place
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 371
- 71.8
used
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 279
Unranked opportunities
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236
every
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,637
care
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Competitors: 262
place
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.0 • Competitors: 371
used
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 279
High competition keywords
every
Total apps: 6,989 • Major competitors: 1,637
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5
help
Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
across
Total apps: 2,646 • Major competitors: 672
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.6
first
Total apps: 2,569 • Major competitors: 528
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| care | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,236 competing apps Median installs: 259,912 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| place | 58 | 100 | 54 | 73 1,689 competing apps Median installs: 247,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 371 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| women | 57 | 100 | 36 | 52 200 competing apps Median installs: 225,512 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 46 major competitor apps |
| help | 59 | 100 | 61 | 85 5,873 competing apps Median installs: 257,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,236 major competitor apps |
| score | 20 | 100 | 52 | 68 977 competing apps Median installs: 314,100 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 264 major competitor apps |
| exam | 57 | 100 | 30 | 47 122 competing apps Median installs: 159,862 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| patient | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 94 competing apps Median installs: 207,600 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| researchers | 56 | 100 | 24 | 32 26 competing apps Median installs: 341,950 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| tool | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| discussion | 56 | 100 | 35 | 35 34 competing apps Median installs: 192,038 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| every | 59 | 100 | 62 | 87 6,989 competing apps Median installs: 280,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,637 major competitor apps |
| guide | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 875 competing apps Median installs: 227,525 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 161 major competitor apps |
| across | 20 | 100 | 63 | 77 2,646 competing apps Median installs: 290,838 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 672 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 253 competing apps Median installs: 218,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| two | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,253 competing apps Median installs: 238,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 249 major competitor apps |
| detected | 57 | 100 | 29 | 41 62 competing apps Median installs: 151,750 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
| provided | 58 | 100 | 45 | 61 515 competing apps Median installs: 271,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| data | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 472 major competitor apps |
| sample | 57 | 100 | 36 | 42 74 competing apps Median installs: 235,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| field | 57 | 100 | 37 | 53 228 competing apps Median installs: 225,675 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 49 major competitor apps |
| participants | 20 | 100 | 37 | 39 50 competing apps Median installs: 276,750 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
| md | 56 | 76 | 18 | 24 10 competing apps Median installs: 144,988 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| final | 57 | 100 | 38 | 55 274 competing apps Median installs: 241,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 50 major competitor apps |
| based | 58 | 100 | 58 | 79 3,039 competing apps Median installs: 256,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
App Description
The MESA CHD Risk Score is the first risk scoring tool to incorporate coronary artery calcium scores. The MESA CHD Risk Score can be used to help guide the intensity of preventive therapies such as diet, exercise, aspirin, blood pressure and cholesterol therapies.
The results and recommendations provided by this application are intended to inform but do not replace clinical judgement. Therapeutic options should be individualized and determined after discussion between the patient and their care provider.
This app was developed under the direction of the MESA Executive Committee by Ted W. James, MD