MESA Risk Score
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 89 keywords for MESA Risk Score in Apple App Store
MESA Risk Score tracks 89 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 88 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 37.2, best rank 169.
Tracked keywords
89
1 ranked • 88 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 169 • Latest leader 169
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: risk
Avg difficulty
37.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.2
risk
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank 169
Competitors: 128
- 66.7
exam
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 40
- 64.6
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 38
- 63.4
pressure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 148
- 65.1
final
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 150
Unranked opportunities
exam
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 40
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 38
pressure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 148
final
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 150
united
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Competitors: 399
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 162,308 • Major competitors: 3,373
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
every
Total apps: 119,677 • Major competitors: 3,438
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
data
Total apps: 97,808 • Major competitors: 1,437
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
based
Total apps: 79,110 • Major competitors: 1,402
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5
first
Total apps: 55,892 • Major competitors: 1,223
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| risk | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 8,396 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | 169 | 169 | 128 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 32,610 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 700 major competitor apps |
| place | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 51,155 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 991 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 50,434 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| women | 72 | 100 | 39 | 62 5,003 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 162,308 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 3,373 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,673 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| exam | 73 | 100 | 40 | 67 10,267 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 40 major competitor apps |
| patient | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,650 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| researchers | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 1,030 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 12 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,503 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| discussion | 71 | 100 | 34 | 55 2,110 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| every | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 119,677 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 3,438 major competitor apps |
| guide | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 33,718 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 466 major competitor apps |
| across | 69 | 100 | 52 | 77 45,087 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,373 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 73 | 100 | 39 | 63 6,497 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 148 major competitor apps |
| two | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 31,328 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 631 major competitor apps |
| detected | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 1,021 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| provided | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,994 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 228 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 97,808 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,437 major competitor apps |
| sample | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,956 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 42 major competitor apps |
| field | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,245 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 126 major competitor apps |
| participants | 72 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,961 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| md | 69 | 100 | 27 | 45 478 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 4 major competitor apps |
| final | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,289 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 150 major competitor apps |
App Description
The MESA CHD Risk Score is the first risk scoring tool to incorporate coronary artery calcium scores. The MESA CHD Risk Score can be used to help guide the intensity of preventive therapies such as diet, exercise, aspirin, blood pressure and cholesterol therapies.
The results and recommendations provided by this application are intended to inform but do not replace clinical judgement. Therapeutic options should be individualized and determined after discussion between the patient and their care provider.
This app was developed under the direction of the MESA Executive Committee by Ted W. James, MD