Teradek Core
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 67 keywords for Teradek Core in Apple App Store
Teradek Core tracks 67 keywords (2 keywords rank; 65 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.0, difficulty 41.8, best rank 34.
Tracked keywords
67
2 ranked • 65 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 34 • Latest leader 108
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: core
Avg difficulty
41.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.4
core
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank 108
Competitors: 113
- 68.4
feed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 187
- 66.7
destination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 184
- 65.3
located
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 45
- 65.9
route
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 114
Unranked opportunities
feed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 187
destination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Competitors: 184
located
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 45
route
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 114
delivering
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 65
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
every
Total apps: 120,649 • Major competitors: 2,494
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
save
Total apps: 85,036 • Major competitors: 1,597
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
allows
Total apps: 80,365 • Major competitors: 658
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| core | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 10,665 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | 108 | 34 | 113 major competitor apps |
| video streaming | 69 | 100 | 34 | 46 536 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 3.9 | 164 | 164 | 18 major competitor apps |
| feed | 73 | 100 | 46 | 68 12,244 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 187 major competitor apps |
| device | 69 | 100 | 50 | 79 50,271 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 843 major competitor apps |
| destination | 73 | 100 | 45 | 67 9,621 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 184 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 60,732 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 667 major competitor apps |
| live | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 61,698 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,158 major competitor apps |
| active | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 22,788 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 493 major competitor apps |
| digital | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 46,511 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 703 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 42,405 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 336 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 85,036 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,597 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 65,573 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 966 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| video | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 46,368 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 888 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 67,998 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,401 major competitor apps |
| store | 69 | 100 | 51 | 77 41,137 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 898 major competitor apps |
| ios | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 32,381 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 427 major competitor apps |
| located | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,951 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| allows | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,365 competing apps Median installs: 374 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 658 major competitor apps |
| feature | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 33,369 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 565 major competitor apps |
| internet | 69 | 100 | 49 | 76 36,677 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 562 major competitor apps |
| devices | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 24,538 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 448 major competitor apps |
| every | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 120,649 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,494 major competitor apps |
| archive | 71 | 100 | 39 | 57 2,647 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 47 major competitor apps |
App Description
Manage your Teradek IP video devices and live streams in real-time from your iOS device. The Core app gives you unprecedented control over your Teradek digital video workflow from anywhere in the world.*
*Requires active Core subscription.
What is Core?
Core is Teradek’s cloud-based IP video management platform designed for professional broadcasters. Core allows you to route, monitor, archive and distribute your video feeds from any web browser or iOS device with an internet connection.
Multi-Destination Streaming
Distribute your streams to an unlimited number of destinations, including live platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Periscope, etc.) and Teradek decoders, all at the same time.
Remote Configuration / Monitoring
Remotely configure every parameter of your Teradek codec (resolution, bitrate, etc.) or route the video feed to any compatible Teradek decoders located locally or off site.
Cloud Archiving
Safely record and store your streams on Core for post-production or delivery at a later time.
Transcoding
Convert HEVC (H.265) video feeds to AVC (H.264) in real-time. Core’s transcoding feature allows Teradek HEVC users to save on uplink bandwidth while delivering video in the widely accepted H.264 format.