Weeds of Australian Cotton
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 104 keywords for Weeds of Australian Cotton in Apple App Store
Weeds of Australian Cotton tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 38.9.
Tracked keywords
104
0 ranked • 104 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: individuals
Avg difficulty
38.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.8
individuals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 25
- 68.7
hand
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 121
- 66.4
assist
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 46
- 66.1
interested
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 53
- 67.6
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 45
Unranked opportunities
individuals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 25
hand
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 121
assist
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 46
interested
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 53
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 45
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 140,188 • Major competitors: 1,776
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
find
Total apps: 136,150 • Major competitors: 1,470
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
mobile
Total apps: 117,283 • Major competitors: 771
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
using
Total apps: 116,675 • Major competitors: 769
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
designed
Total apps: 116,580 • Major competitors: 545
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 115,306 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,376 major competitor apps |
| images | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 28,795 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 168 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 110,444 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 537 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,580 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 545 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 44 | 74 25,248 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 145 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 41,446 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 141 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 63,800 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 463 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,823 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 134 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,675 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 769 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 52 | 86 136,150 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,470 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 117,283 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 771 major competitor apps |
| key | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 41,565 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 268 major competitor apps |
| note | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 14,680 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 136 major competitor apps |
| visit | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,075 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 366 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,459 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 25 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 71 | 100 | 33 | 55 2,047 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 39,809 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 309 major competitor apps |
| hand | 73 | 100 | 41 | 69 12,606 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 121 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 47,440 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 165 major competitor apps |
| part | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,708 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 217 major competitor apps |
| like | 66 | 100 | 52 | 86 140,188 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,776 major competitor apps |
| please | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 57,100 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 489 major competitor apps |
| assist | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 9,148 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 46 major competitor apps |
| interested | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,796 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 53 major competitor apps |
| hundreds | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,620 competing apps Median installs: 175 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 323 major competitor apps |
App Description
Weed identification in early growth stages is of critical importance for best weed management practices, as similar-looking species often have quite different control requirements, and waiting for diagnostic features like flowers and fruits to appear means the optimal window for herbicide applications has long passed. For this reason, the Weeds of Australian Cotton key includes cotyledon shapes as an important diagnostic character. All key characteristics can be assessed with the naked eye or a hand lens.
It is important to note that weeds not included in the key could be present in cotton fields, and misidentification is possible. Confirming identification with an expert is advised, especially if the weed is proving hard to kill.
The key is illustrated with hundreds of images to assist in identification. The splash screen image was provided by Melanie Jenson. Other images in the key were taken by Graham Charles and Sheldon Navie, unless otherwise stated.
The text for the tool was partly provided from contributions to WeedPak written by Graham Charles, Stephen Johnson and Jeff Werth, and supplied by the Australian Cotton Research and Development Corporation. Some of the text also forms part of the Environmental Weeds of Australia key, written by Sheldon Navie. These resources were compiled and edited by David Thornby.
Support for the creation of the Weeds of Australian Cotton tool was provided by the Australian Cotton Research and Development Corporation as part of project UQ1501.
This app was created using the Lucid Mobile platform, part of the Lucid suite of tools. If you are interested in creating a similar app, or for further information on creating interactive keys, please visit http://www.lucidcentral.org