Weeds of Australian Cotton
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 104 keywords for Weeds of Australian Cotton in Apple App Store
Weeds of Australian Cotton tracks 104 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 104 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 49.8, difficulty 40.5.
Tracked keywords
104
0 ranked • 104 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
49.8
Top keyword: best
Avg difficulty
40.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.9
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,398
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 87.6
like
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,767
- 83.9
features
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,060
- 68.8
images
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 197
Unranked opportunities
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
like
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,767
features
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Competitors: 1,060
images
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Competitors: 197
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 7,508 • Major competitors: 1,767
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
best
Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
features
Total apps: 5,134 • Major competitors: 1,060
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 59 | 100 | 60 | 86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,398 major competitor apps |
| images | 58 | 100 | 51 | 69 1,097 competing apps Median installs: 227,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 197 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| image | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 796 competing apps Median installs: 225,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| management | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 856 competing apps Median installs: 221,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| control | 58 | 100 | 54 | 76 2,353 competing apps Median installs: 243,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 466 major competitor apps |
| created | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 953 competing apps Median installs: 213,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| key | 58 | 100 | 51 | 69 1,089 competing apps Median installs: 257,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| note | 58 | 100 | 48 | 64 676 competing apps Median installs: 256,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| visit | 58 | 100 | 51 | 73 1,608 competing apps Median installs: 279,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 377 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 57 | 100 | 34 | 52 196 competing apps Median installs: 221,938 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| diagnostic | 56 | 100 | 23 | 35 36 competing apps Median installs: 178,900 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| text | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,581 competing apps Median installs: 243,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 315 major competitor apps |
| hand | 58 | 100 | 43 | 62 567 competing apps Median installs: 224,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 111 major competitor apps |
| tool | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| part | 58 | 100 | 54 | 69 1,154 competing apps Median installs: 268,538 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 247 major competitor apps |
| like | 59 | 100 | 63 | 88 7,508 competing apps Median installs: 276,638 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,767 major competitor apps |
| please | 58 | 100 | 53 | 78 2,739 competing apps Median installs: 250,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| assist | 57 | 100 | 37 | 55 258 competing apps Median installs: 232,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| interested | 57 | 100 | 46 | 55 258 competing apps Median installs: 254,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| hundreds | 58 | 100 | 50 | 72 1,526 competing apps Median installs: 290,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 372 major competitor apps |
App Description
Weed identification in early growth stages is of critical importance for best weed management practices, as similar-looking species often have quite different control requirements, and waiting for diagnostic features like flowers and fruits to appear means the optimal window for herbicide applications has long passed. For this reason, the Weeds of Australian Cotton key includes cotyledon shapes as an important diagnostic character. All key characteristics can be assessed with the naked eye or a hand lens.
It is important to note that weeds not included in the key could be present in cotton fields, and misidentification is possible. Confirming identification with an expert is advised, especially if the weed is proving hard to kill.
The key is illustrated with hundreds of images to assist in identification. The splash screen image was provided by Melanie Jenson. Other images in the key were taken by Graham Charles and Sheldon Navie, unless otherwise stated.
The text for the tool was partly provided from contributions to WeedPak written by Graham Charles, Stephen Johnson and Jeff Werth, and supplied by the Australian Cotton Research and Development Corporation. Some of the text also forms part of the Environmental Weeds of Australia key, written by Sheldon Navie. These resources were compiled and edited by David Thornby.
Support for the creation of the Weeds of Australian Cotton tool was provided by the Australian Cotton Research and Development Corporation as part of project UQ1501.
This app was created using the Lucid Mobile platform, part of the Lucid suite of tools. If you are interested in creating a similar app, or for further information on creating interactive keys, please visit http://www.lucidcentral.org