Line-Fit

Developer: Bjarne Berge

Category: Productivity

~150 - 300

3 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 40 keywords for Line-Fit in Apple App Store

Developer: Bjarne Berge Category: productivity Rating: 3.67

Line-Fit tracks 40 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 39 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 47.3, difficulty 35.4, best rank 27.

Tracked keywords

1 ranked • 39 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 27 • Latest leader 28

Avg opportunity

47.3

Top keyword: least

Avg difficulty

35.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

least

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.5 • Rank 28

Competitors: 562
77.9
better

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 450
74.7
perfect

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 813
80.9
always

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 630
77.6
higher

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 133
62.4

Unranked opportunities

better

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Competitors: 450
perfect

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Competitors: 813
always

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.6 • Competitors: 630
higher

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 133
two

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Competitors: 249

High competition keywords

perfect

Total apps: 3,777 • Major competitors: 813

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
least

Total apps: 2,792 • Major competitors: 562

Latest rank: 28 • Difficulty: 54.5
always

Total apps: 2,705 • Major competitors: 630

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
data

Total apps: 2,494 • Major competitors: 472

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.6
better

Total apps: 2,000 • Major competitors: 450

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
least	58	100	55	78 2,792 competing apps Median installs: 256,350 Avg rating: 4.6	28	27	562 major competitor apps
better	58	100	53	75 2,000 competing apps Median installs: 250,162 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	450 major competitor apps
perfect	58	100	56	81 3,777 competing apps Median installs: 270,350 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	813 major competitor apps
always	58	100	56	78 2,705 competing apps Median installs: 275,550 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	630 major competitor apps
fit	20	100	48	65 730 competing apps Median installs: 302,075 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	188 major competitor apps
higher	58	100	43	62 573 competing apps Median installs: 301,950 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	133 major competitor apps
two	58	100	49	70 1,253 competing apps Median installs: 238,750 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	249 major competitor apps
data	58	100	55	77 2,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,338 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	472 major competitor apps
positive	57	100	39	56 298 competing apps Median installs: 236,112 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	50 major competitor apps
form	58	100	48	63 616 competing apps Median installs: 232,138 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	127 major competitor apps
model	57	100	37	55 260 competing apps Median installs: 255,062 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	53 major competitor apps
measure	57	100	37	55 258 competing apps Median installs: 170,888 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	44 major competitor apps
strength	57	100	39	57 320 competing apps Median installs: 216,975 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	51 major competitor apps
relationship	57	100	39	54 240 competing apps Median installs: 247,675 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	42 major competitor apps
line	58	100	49	66 804 competing apps Median installs: 296,375 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	192 major competitor apps
response	57	100	34	45 100 competing apps Median installs: 251,638 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	21 major competitor apps
values	57	100	36	48 135 competing apps Median installs: 229,325 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	30 major competitor apps
close	58	100	52	60 442 competing apps Median installs: 260,338 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	91 major competitor apps
value	58	100	46	62 550 competing apps Median installs: 223,475 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	94 major competitor apps
slope	56	100	31	31 23 competing apps Median installs: 209,325 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	3 major competitor apps
variables	56	100	19	28 16 competing apps Median installs: 133,050 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	2 major competitor apps
association	57	100	54	41 65 competing apps Median installs: 223,300 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	15 major competitor apps
indicate	57	100	24	36 38 competing apps Median installs: 205,725 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	8 major competitor apps
uses	58	100	45	65 740 competing apps Median installs: 230,338 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	156 major competitor apps
coefficient	0	26	11	14 3 competing apps Median installs: 910,850 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	0 major competitor apps

App Description

The Line-Fit app uses linear regression to model the relationship between two variables (x and y) by fitting a linear equation to observed data. One variable is considered to be an explanatory (independent) variable, and the other is considered to be a response (dependent) variable.

A linear regression line has an equation of the form Y = a + bX, where X is the explanatory variable and Y is the dependent variable. The slope of the line is b, and the intercept is a (the value of y when x = 0).

To measure the association between the two variables the correlation coefficient is used, which is a value between -1 and 1 indicating the strength of the association of the observed data for the two variables.

The coefficient of determination, R2, measures how close the data are to the fitted regression line. In general, higher values of R2 indicate a better fit of the model to the given data. R2 is always positive and equal to 1.0 for a perfect fit.