Arkikus - Vitoria-Gasteiz 1850
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 66 keywords for Arkikus - Vitoria-Gasteiz 1850 in Apple App Store
Arkikus - Vitoria-Gasteiz 1850 tracks 66 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 66 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 47.2, difficulty 36.3.
Tracked keywords
66
0 ranked • 66 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
47.2
Top keyword: new
Avg difficulty
36.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 91.1
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,341
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 72.3
digital
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 339
- 70.0
date
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 274
- 76.3
content
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 481
Unranked opportunities
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Competitors: 2,341
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
digital
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.9 • Competitors: 339
date
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.4 • Competitors: 274
content
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.8 • Competitors: 481
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 10,701 • Major competitors: 2,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
different
Total apps: 4,440 • Major competitors: 823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
available
Total apps: 4,074 • Major competitors: 979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 59 | 100 | 64 | 91 10,701 competing apps Median installs: 270,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| environment | 57 | 100 | 38 | 59 397 competing apps Median installs: 218,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 63 major competitor apps |
| digital | 58 | 100 | 52 | 72 1,579 competing apps Median installs: 256,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 339 major competitor apps |
| date | 58 | 100 | 55 | 70 1,250 competing apps Median installs: 269,412 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| content | 58 | 100 | 57 | 76 2,368 competing apps Median installs: 245,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 481 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| town | 57 | 100 | 46 | 58 364 competing apps Median installs: 224,112 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| de | 57 | 100 | 36 | 54 236 competing apps Median installs: 202,262 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 58 | 100 | 53 | 69 1,101 competing apps Median installs: 270,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| upon | 58 | 100 | 41 | 62 570 competing apps Median installs: 215,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| achieve | 58 | 100 | 44 | 64 697 competing apps Median installs: 225,025 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| devices | 58 | 100 | 56 | 69 1,158 competing apps Median installs: 268,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 267 major competitor apps |
| display | 58 | 100 | 42 | 63 607 competing apps Median installs: 216,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| interpretation | 56 | 100 | 20 | 31 23 competing apps Median installs: 189,175 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| municipal | 0 | 26 | 12 | 14 3 competing apps Median installs: 67,450 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| spaces | 57 | 100 | 37 | 47 123 competing apps Median installs: 240,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| different | 58 | 100 | 56 | 82 4,440 competing apps Median installs: 240,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 823 major competitor apps |
| show | 58 | 100 | 55 | 74 1,889 competing apps Median installs: 281,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 446 major competitor apps |
| present | 57 | 100 | 41 | 53 226 competing apps Median installs: 208,862 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 49 major competitor apps |
| main | 58 | 100 | 41 | 62 574 competing apps Median installs: 225,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 99 major competitor apps |
| resources | 58 | 100 | 41 | 61 522 competing apps Median installs: 217,912 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| specialists | 57 | 100 | 26 | 37 43 competing apps Median installs: 239,325 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
App Description
The virtual reconstruction included in this app aims to show the architectural atmosphere that the town of Vitoria-Gasteiz (Basque Country, Spain) showed in 1850, before the demolition of the gateways that protected the medieval walls and its subsequent modernisation.
All digital content included in this application has been elaborated on the basis of the main image, documentary and archeological resources available at the present time for the reconstructed spaces or, where sources are lacking for certain elements, by using chronologically, geographically and stylistically proximate architectural and/or ornamental parallels, in an attempt to achieve the maximum degree of historical accuracy.The reconstructions that are included display an interpretation of the heritage environment agreed upon by different specialists at the date of creation of the app; new research may well refine this interpretation further.
Acknowledgments: Binary Soul SL, Ismael García (Enklabe KST), María José Marinas (Archivo Municipal de Vitoria-Gasteiz), José Antonio Sáinz (Archivo Histórico Provincial de Álava), Javier Niso y Miguel Loza (Iterbide SC), Egoitz Alfaro y Francisca Vives (UPV/EHU), Nagore González, François Monciero, Nick Gardner, Enrique Loza, Natalia Martínez, Joseba Ordoño.