Curve-Fit
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 69 keywords for Curve-Fit in Apple App Store
Curve-Fit tracks 69 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 68 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.3, difficulty 36.9, best rank 11.
Tracked keywords
69
1 ranked • 68 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 11 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: format
Avg difficulty
36.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.0
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 43
- 67.3
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 68.0
functions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 43
- 68.0
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 110
- 64.0
routine
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 54
Unranked opportunities
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 43
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 60
functions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 43
done
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 110
routine
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 54
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 163,297 • Major competitors: 2,211
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
find
Total apps: 138,038 • Major competitors: 1,542
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
best
Total apps: 116,487 • Major competitors: 1,424
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
using
Total apps: 116,003 • Major competitors: 808
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.2
data
Total apps: 85,700 • Major competitors: 495
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| least | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 30,849 competing apps Median installs: 225 Avg rating: 4.2 | 11 | 11 | 517 major competitor apps |
| free | 65 | 100 | 53 | 87 163,297 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,211 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,487 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,424 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,440 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 181 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 50,920 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 250 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,003 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 808 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 52 | 86 138,038 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,542 major competitor apps |
| format | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 8,793 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| technique | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,823 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| purchase | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 41,932 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 486 major competitor apps |
| minimum | 72 | 100 | 37 | 60 3,888 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 49 | 82 77,521 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 685 major competitor apps |
| fit | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 15,905 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| needed | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,417 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| functions | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,537 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| literature | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 920 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 18,957 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 124 major competitor apps |
| done | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,535 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 110 major competitor apps |
| routine | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,674 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 54 major competitor apps |
| generated | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,625 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 40 major competitor apps |
| data | 67 | 100 | 50 | 83 85,700 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 495 major competitor apps |
| forms | 72 | 100 | 37 | 62 5,042 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 23 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 80,372 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 606 major competitor apps |
| straight | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,262 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 140 major competitor apps |
| method | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,290 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 41 major competitor apps |
App Description
The curve-fitting technique used in this app is based on regression analysis by the method of least squares. The free version fits a straight line through a data-set using least squares analysis.
One In-App purchase is required to fit the other equations to the data set:
Straight Line : Y = C0 + C1*X (free)
Power Curve : Y = C0 + X^C1 Exponential I : Y = C0 * EXP(C1*X)
Exponential II : Y = C0 * X * EXP(C1*X)
Hyperbolic : Y = (C0 + C1*X)/(1 - C2*X)
Square Root : Y = C0 + C1*SQRT(X)
Polynomial : Y = C0 + C1*X + --- + CN*X^N
Exponential Poly : Y = C0 * EXP(C1*X + --- +
Natural Log : Y = C0 + C1*(LN(X)) + --- +
Reciprocal : Y = C0 + C1/X + --- + CN/X^N
Most literature deals with least squares analysis for straight lines, 2nd degree polynomials, and functions that can be linearized. The input-data is transformed into a format that the can be put into linear forms with undetermined constants. These types of equations are applicable for least-squares regression.
The regression routine is needed for determining values for the set of unknown quantities C1, C2,- - - ,Cm in the equation:
Y = C1 x F1(X) + C2 x F2(X) + - - - + Cm x Fm(X)
The constants are determined to minimize the sum of squares of the differences between the measured values (Y1, Y2, - - - , Yn) and the predicted equation Yc = F(X) which is found by curve-fitting the given data.
The principle of least squares is to find the values for the unknowns C1 through Cm that will minimize the sum of the squares of the residuals:
n
∑(ri) = r12 + r22 + - - - + rn2 = minimum
i=1
This is done by letting the derivative of the above equation equal zero. Thereby there will be generated as many algebraic equations as given data points, and the number of equations will be larger than unknowns.