Curve-Fit

Curve-Fit
Developer: Bjarne Berge
Category: Tools
~50 - 100
1 ratings
Curve-Fit icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 69 keywords for Curve-Fit in Apple App Store

Developer: Bjarne Berge Category: tools Rating: 5

Curve-Fit tracks 69 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 68 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 47.1, difficulty 37.5, best rank 11.

Tracked keywords

69

1  ranked •  68  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

0%

Best rank 11 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

47.1

Top keyword: free

Avg difficulty

37.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • free

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 2,147

    89.9
  • best

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,398

    85.9
  • find

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,481

    86.3
  • least

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.5 • Rank 11

    Competitors: 562

    77.9
  • version

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —

    Competitors: 182

    67.9

Unranked opportunities

  • free

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Competitors: 2,147

  • best

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398

  • find

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481

  • version

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 182

  • used

    Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 279

High competition keywords

  • free

    Total apps: 9,480 • Major competitors: 2,147

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.5

  • find

    Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8

  • best

    Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6

  • using

    Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4

  • many

    Total apps: 3,804 • Major competitors: 758

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
least581005578

2,792 competing apps

Median installs: 256,350

Avg rating: 4.6

1111

562

major competitor apps

free591006390

9,480 competing apps

Median installs: 264,750

Avg rating: 4.6

2,147

major competitor apps

best591006086

6,283 competing apps

Median installs: 272,625

Avg rating: 4.6

1,398

major competitor apps

version581004668

1,006 competing apps

Median installs: 238,775

Avg rating: 4.6

182

major competitor apps

used581005372

1,494 competing apps

Median installs: 237,800

Avg rating: 4.6

279

major competitor apps

using581006183

4,473 competing apps

Median installs: 247,200

Avg rating: 4.6

924

major competitor apps

find591006486

6,521 competing apps

Median installs: 264,850

Avg rating: 4.6

1,481

major competitor apps

format571003753

231 competing apps

Median installs: 251,875

Avg rating: 4.6

44

major competitor apps

technique571002638

48 competing apps

Median installs: 291,288

Avg rating: 4.7

10

major competitor apps

purchase581005476

2,190 competing apps

Median installs: 258,238

Avg rating: 4.6

470

major competitor apps

minimum201005051

185 competing apps

Median installs: 254,825

Avg rating: 4.6

49

major competitor apps

many581005581

3,804 competing apps

Median installs: 252,775

Avg rating: 4.6

758

major competitor apps

fit201004865

730 competing apps

Median installs: 302,075

Avg rating: 4.7

188

major competitor apps

needed571004457

346 competing apps

Median installs: 200,188

Avg rating: 4.6

61

major competitor apps

functions571003756

288 competing apps

Median installs: 210,062

Avg rating: 4.5

46

major competitor apps

literature561004232

24 competing apps

Median installs: 143,562

Avg rating: 4.8

3

major competitor apps

required581005164

665 competing apps

Median installs: 263,050

Avg rating: 4.6

143

major competitor apps

done581004862

564 competing apps

Median installs: 250,900

Avg rating: 4.6

120

major competitor apps

routine571003954

244 competing apps

Median installs: 275,900

Avg rating: 4.7

51

major competitor apps

generated571004256

295 competing apps

Median installs: 242,550

Avg rating: 4.6

46

major competitor apps

data581005577

2,494 competing apps

Median installs: 237,338

Avg rating: 4.6

472

major competitor apps

forms571003448

133 competing apps

Median installs: 255,675

Avg rating: 4.7

26

major competitor apps

based581005879

3,039 competing apps

Median installs: 256,925

Avg rating: 4.6

697

major competitor apps

straight201005261

516 competing apps

Median installs: 291,175

Avg rating: 4.7

135

major competitor apps

method571003952

199 competing apps

Median installs: 242,575

Avg rating: 4.7

41

major competitor apps

69 keywords
1 of 3

App Description

'CurveFit' uses regression analysis by the method of least squares to find best fit for a set of data to a selected equation.

The curve-fitting technique used in this app is based on regression analysis by the method of least squares. The free version fits a straight line through a data-set using least squares analysis.

One In-App purchase is required to fit the other equations to the data set:
Straight Line : Y = C0 + C1*X (free)
Power Curve : Y = C0 + X^C1 Exponential I : Y = C0 * EXP(C1*X)
Exponential II : Y = C0 * X * EXP(C1*X)
Hyperbolic : Y = (C0 + C1*X)/(1 - C2*X)
Square Root : Y = C0 + C1*SQRT(X)
Polynomial : Y = C0 + C1*X + --- + CN*X^N
Exponential Poly : Y = C0 * EXP(C1*X + --- +
Natural Log : Y = C0 + C1*(LN(X)) + --- +
Reciprocal : Y = C0 + C1/X + --- + CN/X^N

Most literature deals with least squares analysis for straight lines, 2nd degree polynomials, and functions that can be linearized. The input-data is transformed into a format that the can be put into linear forms with undetermined constants. These types of equations are applicable for least-squares regression.

The regression routine is needed for determining values for the set of unknown quantities C1, C2,- - - ,Cm in the equation:

Y = C1 x F1(X) + C2 x F2(X) + - - - + Cm x Fm(X)

The constants are determined to minimize the sum of squares of the differences between the measured values (Y1, Y2, - - - , Yn) and the predicted equation Yc = F(X) which is found by curve-fitting the given data.

The principle of least squares is to find the values for the unknowns C1 through Cm that will minimize the sum of the squares of the residuals:

n
∑(ri) = r12 + r22 + - - - + rn2 = minimum
i=1

This is done by letting the derivative of the above equation equal zero. Thereby there will be generated as many algebraic equations as given data points, and the number of equations will be larger than unknowns.