Curve-Fit
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 69 keywords for Curve-Fit in Apple App Store
Curve-Fit tracks 69 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 68 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 47.1, difficulty 37.5, best rank 11.
Tracked keywords
69
1 ranked • 68 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 11 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
47.1
Top keyword: free
Avg difficulty
37.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 89.9
free
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,147
- 85.9
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,398
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 77.9
least
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.5 • Rank 11
Competitors: 562
- 67.9
version
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 182
Unranked opportunities
free
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.5 • Competitors: 2,147
best
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.6 • Competitors: 1,398
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
version
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.6 • Competitors: 182
used
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.9 • Competitors: 279
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 9,480 • Major competitors: 2,147
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.5
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
best
Total apps: 6,283 • Major competitors: 1,398
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.6
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
many
Total apps: 3,804 • Major competitors: 758
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| least | 58 | 100 | 55 | 78 2,792 competing apps Median installs: 256,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | 11 | 11 | 562 major competitor apps |
| free | 59 | 100 | 63 | 90 9,480 competing apps Median installs: 264,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,147 major competitor apps |
| best | 59 | 100 | 60 | 86 6,283 competing apps Median installs: 272,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,398 major competitor apps |
| version | 58 | 100 | 46 | 68 1,006 competing apps Median installs: 238,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 182 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| format | 57 | 100 | 37 | 53 231 competing apps Median installs: 251,875 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 44 major competitor apps |
| technique | 57 | 100 | 26 | 38 48 competing apps Median installs: 291,288 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| purchase | 58 | 100 | 54 | 76 2,190 competing apps Median installs: 258,238 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 470 major competitor apps |
| minimum | 20 | 100 | 50 | 51 185 competing apps Median installs: 254,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 49 major competitor apps |
| many | 58 | 100 | 55 | 81 3,804 competing apps Median installs: 252,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| fit | 20 | 100 | 48 | 65 730 competing apps Median installs: 302,075 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 188 major competitor apps |
| needed | 57 | 100 | 44 | 57 346 competing apps Median installs: 200,188 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 61 major competitor apps |
| functions | 57 | 100 | 37 | 56 288 competing apps Median installs: 210,062 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 46 major competitor apps |
| literature | 56 | 100 | 42 | 32 24 competing apps Median installs: 143,562 Avg rating: 4.8 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| required | 58 | 100 | 51 | 64 665 competing apps Median installs: 263,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 143 major competitor apps |
| done | 58 | 100 | 48 | 62 564 competing apps Median installs: 250,900 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
| routine | 57 | 100 | 39 | 54 244 competing apps Median installs: 275,900 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
| generated | 57 | 100 | 42 | 56 295 competing apps Median installs: 242,550 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 46 major competitor apps |
| data | 58 | 100 | 55 | 77 2,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 472 major competitor apps |
| forms | 57 | 100 | 34 | 48 133 competing apps Median installs: 255,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| based | 58 | 100 | 58 | 79 3,039 competing apps Median installs: 256,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| straight | 20 | 100 | 52 | 61 516 competing apps Median installs: 291,175 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 135 major competitor apps |
| method | 57 | 100 | 39 | 52 199 competing apps Median installs: 242,575 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 41 major competitor apps |
App Description
The curve-fitting technique used in this app is based on regression analysis by the method of least squares. The free version fits a straight line through a data-set using least squares analysis.
One In-App purchase is required to fit the other equations to the data set:
Straight Line : Y = C0 + C1*X (free)
Power Curve : Y = C0 + X^C1 Exponential I : Y = C0 * EXP(C1*X)
Exponential II : Y = C0 * X * EXP(C1*X)
Hyperbolic : Y = (C0 + C1*X)/(1 - C2*X)
Square Root : Y = C0 + C1*SQRT(X)
Polynomial : Y = C0 + C1*X + --- + CN*X^N
Exponential Poly : Y = C0 * EXP(C1*X + --- +
Natural Log : Y = C0 + C1*(LN(X)) + --- +
Reciprocal : Y = C0 + C1/X + --- + CN/X^N
Most literature deals with least squares analysis for straight lines, 2nd degree polynomials, and functions that can be linearized. The input-data is transformed into a format that the can be put into linear forms with undetermined constants. These types of equations are applicable for least-squares regression.
The regression routine is needed for determining values for the set of unknown quantities C1, C2,- - - ,Cm in the equation:
Y = C1 x F1(X) + C2 x F2(X) + - - - + Cm x Fm(X)
The constants are determined to minimize the sum of squares of the differences between the measured values (Y1, Y2, - - - , Yn) and the predicted equation Yc = F(X) which is found by curve-fitting the given data.
The principle of least squares is to find the values for the unknowns C1 through Cm that will minimize the sum of the squares of the residuals:
n
∑(ri) = r12 + r22 + - - - + rn2 = minimum
i=1
This is done by letting the derivative of the above equation equal zero. Thereby there will be generated as many algebraic equations as given data points, and the number of equations will be larger than unknowns.