AeroEngineS
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 52 keywords for AeroEngineS in Apple App Store
AeroEngineS tracks 52 keywords (2 keywords rank; 50 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.0, difficulty 38.2, best rank 12.
Tracked keywords
52
2 ranked • 50 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 12 • Latest leader 12
Avg opportunity
71.0
Top keyword: engine
Avg difficulty
38.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.5
engine
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank 12
Competitors: 131
- 64.5
simulation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 186
- 64.7
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 38
- 63.4
pressure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 105
- 67.3
air
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 226
Unranked opportunities
simulation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 186
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 38
pressure
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 105
air
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.2 • Competitors: 226
flight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 133
High competition keywords
using
Total apps: 114,611 • Major competitors: 1,562
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
based
Total apps: 79,314 • Major competitors: 1,056
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8
design
Total apps: 40,747 • Major competitors: 678
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.3
power
Total apps: 38,706 • Major competitors: 619
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.5
performance
Total apps: 28,048 • Major competitors: 247
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 45.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| engine | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 8,682 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | 12 | 12 | 131 major competitor apps |
| engines | 70 | 100 | 30 | 49 947 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.0 | 16 | 16 | 17 major competitor apps |
| simulation | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,604 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 186 major competitor apps |
| design | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 40,747 competing apps Median installs: 529 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 678 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 21,959 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 252 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,611 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,562 major competitor apps |
| international | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 16,876 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 263 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,756 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| power | 69 | 100 | 48 | 76 38,706 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 619 major competitor apps |
| area | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 16,756 competing apps Median installs: 395 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 207 major competitor apps |
| type | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 25,643 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 292 major competitor apps |
| performance | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 28,048 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 247 major competitor apps |
| map | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 26,058 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 395 major competitor apps |
| calculation | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,175 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 73 | 100 | 39 | 63 6,479 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| automatic | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 22,901 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 395 major competitor apps |
| air | 73 | 100 | 43 | 67 11,139 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 17,351 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 223 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 51 | 81 79,314 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,056 major competitor apps |
| cycle | 72 | 100 | 39 | 61 4,558 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 71 major competitor apps |
| component | 71 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,536 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| flight | 73 | 100 | 43 | 63 6,488 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| conditions | 73 | 100 | 44 | 67 10,804 competing apps Median installs: 630 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 233 major competitor apps |
| optimized | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 9,734 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 167 major competitor apps |
| point | 71 | 100 | 44 | 71 19,493 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 212 major competitor apps |
App Description
- Subsonic/Supersonic 1-Spool Turbojet
- Subsonic 2-Spool Turbofan
- Subsonic 2-Spool Boosted Turbofan
- Subsonic 3-Spool Turbofan
- Analysis of the Thermodynamic Cycle
- Nozzle Area and Performance (Thrust, Power etc.) calculation
- Mass Flows (Core, Bypass, Fuel)
- Automatic calculation of ambient conditions based on the flight altitude using the International Standard Atmosphere model
- Automatic calculation of Cp, gama, R for each component based on temperature and Fuel to Air Ratio
- Automatic calculation of isentropic efficiency for each compressor and turbine based on polytropic efficiency and pressure ratio
Hybrid Precooled Rocket Engine at Design Point
- Analysis of the combined Thermodynamic Cycles with Air, Hydrogen & Helium as working fluids
Ramjet Engine at Design Point
- Simulation of the thermodynamic cycle of a hydrogen-fuelled Ramjet engine at optimized conditions.
Ramjet Engine at Design Point
- Simulation of the thermodynamic cycle of a hydrogen-fuelled Ramjet engine at optimized conditions.
Supersonic 2-spool Turbojet Engine at Design Point
- Simulation of the thermodynamic cycle of a Supersonic 2-spool turbojet engine with reheat.
Aircraft Emissions
- Emissions calculation for aircraft engines in LTO cycle and Cruise
- Type of turbofan engines used: 1. Subsonic 2-Spool, 2. Subsonic 3-Spool
Compressor Map Operating Point Prediction using
- Scaling Techniques on an existing HPC map
- Artificial Neural Networks to interpolate the existing map's data
______________________________________________________
Developer: Aggelos Gaitanis
Original creator: Evangelia Pontika
HyRE, Ramjet tab programmer: Spiros Tsentis
Supersonic 2-spool Reheated tab programmer: Anastasios Saflekos
Emissions tab developer/programmer: Maria Bakali
Advisor: Ioanna Aslanidou, Konstantinos Kyprianidis
Supervisor: Anestis Kalfas