Slip Testing
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 50 keywords for Slip Testing in Apple App Store
Slip Testing tracks 50 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 49 need traction). Key metrics: 100% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 40.4, best rank 10.
Tracked keywords
50
1 ranked • 49 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
100%
Best rank 10 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: post
Avg difficulty
40.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.7
post
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 204
- 65.5
benefit
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 118
- 68.7
professionals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 73
- 67.7
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 94
- 68.0
towards
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 109
Unranked opportunities
post
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 204
benefit
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 118
professionals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 73
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 94
towards
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 109
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 2,451
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
mobile
Total apps: 120,211 • Major competitors: 1,593
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
account
Total apps: 81,354 • Major competitors: 2,100
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
based
Total apps: 79,669 • Major competitors: 1,056
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.1
offers
Total apps: 74,543 • Major competitors: 1,355
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| slip | 70 | 100 | 32 | 49 874 competing apps Median installs: 506 Avg rating: 4.1 | 10 | 10 | 17 major competitor apps |
| international | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 15,231 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 255 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 120,211 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,593 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,451 major competitor apps |
| account | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 81,354 competing apps Median installs: 1,000 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,100 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 38,610 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 710 major competitor apps |
| surface | 71 | 100 | 39 | 57 2,694 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 46 major competitor apps |
| post | 73 | 100 | 48 | 69 12,788 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 204 major competitor apps |
| benefit | 73 | 100 | 42 | 65 8,184 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 118 major competitor apps |
| professionals | 73 | 100 | 42 | 69 12,697 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| fit | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 16,105 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 339 major competitor apps |
| aware | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,033 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 55 major competitor apps |
| project | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,045 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| towards | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,584 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| reduce | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,141 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 151 major competitor apps |
| local | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 44,252 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 754 major competitor apps |
| global | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 23,970 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 504 major competitor apps |
| successful | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,253 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 87 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 79,669 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,056 major competitor apps |
| providing | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 28,965 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 204 major competitor apps |
| globally | 71 | 100 | 40 | 54 1,653 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 32 major competitor apps |
| meeting | 73 | 100 | 43 | 65 8,127 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| addition | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 12,793 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 161 major competitor apps |
| taking | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 18,349 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 264 major competitor apps |
| specific | 69 | 100 | 48 | 76 36,291 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 409 major competitor apps |
App Description
Identify the appropriate slip resistance classification for your pedestrian surface material, ensuring it is fit for purpose, towards meeting local and (for exporters) international standards.
Classifications are based on results achieved by the British Pendulum test method, the leading and globally accepted test method, popular in it’s reliability, and ability to both classify pedestrian surface materials and in-situ post installation (with comparable results).
Pedestrian surface stakeholders including- customers, manufacturers, designers, specifiers, retailers, installers, and treatment professionals can all benefit in being forearmed and aware of the appropriate slip resistance classification for the project at hand.
In addition to providing slip resistance classifications for specific locations, this app offers a calculator for taking into account sloping surfaces and pedestrian ramps.
Thank you for considering the global Slip Testing mobile app. Have a successful day.