Timeslips
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 60 keywords for Timeslips in Apple App Store
Timeslips tracks 60 keywords (2 keywords rank; 58 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.9, difficulty 41.7, best rank 165.
Tracked keywords
60
2 ranked • 58 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 165 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: efficiency
Avg difficulty
41.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.7
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 52
- 64.2
green
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 161
- 62.2
description
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 62
- 64.6
cars
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 302
- 65.5
model
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 155
Unranked opportunities
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 52
green
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 161
description
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 62
cars
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 302
model
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 155
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 182,102 • Major competitors: 5,293
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
like
Total apps: 153,440 • Major competitors: 4,505
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
find
Total apps: 150,020 • Major competitors: 3,804
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.6
best
Total apps: 124,659 • Major competitors: 3,676
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
information
Total apps: 121,675 • Major competitors: 1,488
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| enthusiast | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,222 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | 165 | 165 | 29 major competitor apps |
| enthusiastic | 69 | 100 | 28 | 46 548 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 174 | 174 | 7 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 124,659 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 3,676 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 182,102 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 5,293 major competitor apps |
| whether | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 89,111 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,501 major competitor apps |
| classic | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 27,341 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,052 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,675 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,488 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 50,473 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 700 major competitor apps |
| save | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 93,604 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,238 major competitor apps |
| profile | 71 | 100 | 47 | 71 19,967 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 400 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 115,841 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,692 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 150,020 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 3,804 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 28,707 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 333 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,758 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| others | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 15,898 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 366 major competitor apps |
| vehicle | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 15,081 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 264 major competitor apps |
| many | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 76,796 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,913 major competitor apps |
| want | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 83,244 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,037 major competitor apps |
| performance | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 28,070 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 359 major competitor apps |
| like | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 153,440 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 4,505 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 92,538 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,331 major competitor apps |
| enter | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 23,912 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 531 major competitor apps |
| transmission | 71 | 100 | 33 | 54 1,673 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 3.7 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| green | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 7,233 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 161 major competitor apps |
| description | 73 | 100 | 39 | 62 5,520 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 62 major competitor apps |
App Description
Timeslips is a must-have for enthusiasts. Whether you want to compare 0-60 times of 90's favorites like the Supra and GT-R, or quarter mile times of classic muscle like a GTO or Mustang, Timeslips is the best way to do it. Just input the vehicle information and get side-by-side comparisons with best times highlighted green and worst times highlighted red. You can even save these comparisons so you can pull them up instantly at a later time.
Set up a profile where others can see what you drive and find your socials. You can add pictures and a description of your cars and their modifications!
Timeslips is essential for anyone in the new or used vehicle market. Whether you're comparing performance specs or even just looking to find out the MSRP or fuel efficiency of a new car, Timeslips makes the process easy.
Terms of Use: https://www.oxigenic.com/tos