NASB Bible
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 90 keywords for NASB Bible in Apple App Store
NASB Bible tracks 90 keywords (2 keywords rank; 88 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.1, difficulty 36.6, best rank 136.
Tracked keywords
90
2 ranked • 88 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 136 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.1
Top keyword: changes
Avg difficulty
36.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.5
changes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 276
- 68.2
according
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 257
- 64.7
th
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 149
- 62.5
third
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 183
- 63.5
direction
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 138
Unranked opportunities
changes
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Competitors: 276
according
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 257
th
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 149
third
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 183
direction
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 138
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 182,173 • Major competitors: 5,294
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.2
based
Total apps: 79,246 • Major competitors: 1,406
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.5
offers
Total apps: 74,135 • Major competitors: 1,910
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.7
current
Total apps: 73,038 • Major competitors: 2,106
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.1
complete
Total apps: 72,823 • Major competitors: 1,696
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new testament | 69 | 100 | 28 | 45 530 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.4 | 136 | 136 | 8 major competitor apps |
| old testament | 69 | 100 | 28 | 46 578 competing apps Median installs: 1,200 Avg rating: 4.4 | 160 | 160 | 6 major competitor apps |
| new | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 182,173 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 5,294 major competitor apps |
| word | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 25,277 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 489 major competitor apps |
| changes | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 13,196 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 276 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 31,002 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 575 major competitor apps |
| place | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 51,140 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 989 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 50,496 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 700 major competitor apps |
| modern | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 26,020 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 446 major competitor apps |
| english | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 21,741 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 270 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 44,065 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 932 major competitor apps |
| complete | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 72,823 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,696 major competitor apps |
| current | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 73,038 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,106 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 61,454 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,217 major competitor apps |
| ever | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,058 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 748 major competitor apps |
| original | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 19,191 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 760 major competitor apps |
| following | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 30,548 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 696 major competitor apps |
| made | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 36,140 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 805 major competitor apps |
| according | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,704 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 257 major competitor apps |
| give | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 41,681 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 973 major competitor apps |
| greatest | 72 | 100 | 40 | 60 4,279 competing apps Median installs: 800 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 156 major competitor apps |
| old | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 16,474 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 460 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 43 | 70 17,366 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 325 major competitor apps |
| th | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 7,748 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 149 major competitor apps |
| based | 67 | 100 | 50 | 81 79,246 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,406 major competitor apps |
App Description
The NASB was published in the following stages:
Gospel of John (1960)
The Gospels (1962)
New Testament (1963)
Psalms (1968)
Complete Bible, Old and New Testaments (1971)
Modified Editions (1972, 1973, 1975, 1977)
Updated Edition (1995)
In parallel with the Bible itself, the NAS Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible was published in August 1997.For convenience, this concordance uses the same word numbering system as Strong's Concordance.
Translation philosophy
The New American Standard Bible is considered by some sources as the most literally translated of major 20th-century English Bible translations. According to the NASB's preface, the translators had a "Fourfold Aim" in this work:
These publications shall be true to the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek.
They shall be grammatically correct.
They shall be understandable.
They shall give the Lord Jesus Christ His proper place, the place which the Word gives Him; therefore, no work will ever be personalized.
The NASB is an original translation from the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts, based on the same principles of translation, and wording, as the American Standard Version (ASV) of 1901. It offers an alternative to the Revised Standard Version (1946–1952/1971), which is considered by some to be theologically liberal, and also to the 1929 revision of the ASV.
The Hebrew text used for this translation was the third edition of Rudolf Kittel's Biblia Hebraica as well as the Dead Sea Scrolls. The Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia was consulted for the 1995 revision. For Greek, Eberhard Nestle's Novum Testamentum Graece was used; the 23rd edition in the 1971 original, and the 26th in the 1995 revision.
Seeing the need for a literal, modern translation of the English Bible, the translators sought to produce a contemporary English Bible while maintaining a word-for-word translation style. In cases where word-for-word literalness was determined to be unacceptable for modern readers, changes were made in the direction of more current idioms. In some such instances, the more literal renderings were indicated in footnotes.
The greatest strength of the NASB is its relia