UofU Health Burn CSC

Category: Medical

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 64 keywords for UofU Health Burn CSC in Apple App Store

Developer: University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics Category: medical

UofU Health Burn CSC tracks 64 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 64 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 36.5.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 64 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.4

Top keyword: patient

Avg difficulty

36.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 17
64.0
reduce

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 82
68.4
teams

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 96
65.2
fire

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 98
64.2
demand

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 116
66.2

Unranked opportunities

patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 17
reduce

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 82
teams

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 96
fire

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 98
demand

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 116

High competition keywords

access

Total apps: 162,817 • Major competitors: 1,664

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
find

Total apps: 138,567 • Major competitors: 1,771

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
using

Total apps: 115,531 • Major competitors: 949

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
based

Total apps: 80,023 • Major competitors: 681

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
users

Total apps: 60,938 • Major competitors: 440

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
health	69	100	47	77 39,036 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	354 major competitor apps
better	69	100	47	77 41,770 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	456 major competitor apps
care	70	100	45	75 29,438 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	324 major competitor apps
users	68	100	48	80 60,938 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	440 major competitor apps
medical	71	100	43	72 19,229 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	73 major competitor apps
institute	71	100	33	56 2,083 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1 major competitor apps
using	66	100	51	85 115,531 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	949 major competitor apps
find	66	100	52	86 138,567 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,771 major competitor apps
program	72	100	43	71 17,264 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	147 major competitor apps
access	65	100	53	87 162,817 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,664 major competitor apps
patient	73	100	38	64 6,666 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	17 major competitor apps
fair	72	100	36	60 3,937 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	56 major competitor apps
west	71	100	35	58 2,884 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	23 major competitor apps
reduce	73	100	41	68 12,200 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	82 major competitor apps
guideline	68	100	25	41 280 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	0 major competitor apps
resources	72	100	42	70 15,823 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	87 major competitor apps
standard	72	100	42	70 15,672 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	138 major competitor apps
based	67	100	50	82 80,023 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	681 major competitor apps
teams	73	100	40	65 7,906 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	96 major competitor apps
fire	73	100	39	64 6,816 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	98 major competitor apps
demand	73	100	41	66 9,040 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	116 major competitor apps
gain	71	100	44	73 22,781 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	204 major competitor apps
staff	72	100	42	70 14,559 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	34 major competitor apps
officer	70	100	31	51 1,110 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	18 major competitor apps
first	68	100	48	80 56,515 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	553 major competitor apps

App Description

U of U Health’s TeleBurn program is pioneering the evaluation and treatment of burn injuries in the Mountain West and beyond. Providers can reduce costs, expand specialty burn care access to patients, and produce better outcomes for burn and frostbite survivors using the U of U Health Burn CSC app.

Physicians, EMS, wildland fire fighters, nurses, emergency managers, palliative care specialists, military, state and federal disaster teams, triage, burn, and casualty teams, ER staff, and first responders will find the U of U Health Burn CSC app invaluable.

U of U Health Burn CSC app meets the Utah Crisis Standards of Care Guidelines, Pediatric Crisis Standards of Care Guidelines, and Burn Crisis Standards of Care Guidelines for care in situations when overwhelming demand on resources and medical staff occur —based on the Institute of Medicine’s recommendations. The Utah Crisis Standards of Care Guideline identifies, trains, and empowers Crisis Triage Officers (CTOs) and Crisis Triage Officer Teams (CTOT).

Crisis Standard of Care guidelines maximize patient outcomes with fair and equitable allocation of scarce resources. Through the U of U Health Burn CSC app, qualified users from all 50 states and 97 countries gain access from anywhere.