UofU Health Burn CSC
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 63 keywords for UofU Health Burn CSC in Apple App Store
UofU Health Burn CSC tracks 63 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 63 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 46.4, difficulty 37.1.
Tracked keywords
63
0 ranked • 63 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
46.4
Top keyword: find
Avg difficulty
37.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 85.7
access
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,388
- 70.9
health
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 307
- 74.7
better
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 450
- 69.9
care
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 262
Unranked opportunities
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
access
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,388
health
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Competitors: 307
better
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.5 • Competitors: 450
care
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.2 • Competitors: 262
High competition keywords
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
access
Total apps: 6,181 • Major competitors: 1,388
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
based
Total apps: 3,039 • Major competitors: 697
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
first
Total apps: 2,569 • Major competitors: 528
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| health | 58 | 100 | 51 | 71 1,361 competing apps Median installs: 248,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 307 major competitor apps |
| better | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,000 competing apps Median installs: 250,162 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 450 major competitor apps |
| care | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,236 competing apps Median installs: 259,912 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 262 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| medical | 58 | 100 | 39 | 59 418 competing apps Median installs: 192,125 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| institute | 56 | 83 | 19 | 24 11 competing apps Median installs: 314,300 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| program | 58 | 100 | 51 | 62 534 competing apps Median installs: 269,325 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 126 major competitor apps |
| access | 59 | 100 | 63 | 86 6,181 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,388 major competitor apps |
| patient | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 94 competing apps Median installs: 207,600 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| fair | 57 | 100 | 36 | 53 211 competing apps Median installs: 278,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 48 major competitor apps |
| west | 57 | 100 | 33 | 46 109 competing apps Median installs: 303,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 17 major competitor apps |
| reduce | 58 | 100 | 46 | 59 421 competing apps Median installs: 239,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 72 major competitor apps |
| guideline | 0 | 34 | 10 | 16 4 competing apps Median installs: 205,288 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| resources | 58 | 100 | 41 | 61 522 competing apps Median installs: 217,912 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 86 major competitor apps |
| standard | 58 | 100 | 43 | 62 541 competing apps Median installs: 259,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| based | 58 | 100 | 58 | 79 3,039 competing apps Median installs: 256,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| teams | 20 | 100 | 47 | 58 363 competing apps Median installs: 369,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 105 major competitor apps |
| fire | 57 | 100 | 43 | 58 371 competing apps Median installs: 235,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 82 major competitor apps |
| demand | 20 | 100 | 63 | 58 354 competing apps Median installs: 313,562 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| gain | 58 | 100 | 44 | 66 826 competing apps Median installs: 244,762 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 165 major competitor apps |
| staff | 57 | 100 | 34 | 50 167 competing apps Median installs: 245,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 32 major competitor apps |
| officer | 20 | 100 | 28 | 39 50 competing apps Median installs: 437,612 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| first | 58 | 100 | 54 | 77 2,569 competing apps Median installs: 243,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 528 major competitor apps |
App Description
Physicians, EMS, wildland fire fighters, nurses, emergency managers, palliative care specialists, military, state and federal disaster teams, triage, burn, and casualty teams, ER staff, and first responders will find the U of U Health Burn CSC app invaluable.
U of U Health Burn CSC app meets the Utah Crisis Standards of Care Guidelines, Pediatric Crisis Standards of Care Guidelines, and Burn Crisis Standards of Care Guidelines for care in situations when overwhelming demand on resources and medical staff occur —based on the Institute of Medicine’s recommendations. The Utah Crisis Standards of Care Guideline identifies, trains, and empowers Crisis Triage Officers (CTOs) and Crisis Triage Officer Teams (CTOT).
Crisis Standard of Care guidelines maximize patient outcomes with fair and equitable allocation of scarce resources. Through the U of U Health Burn CSC app, qualified users from all 50 states and 97 countries gain access from anywhere.