MathsAtHome
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 77 keywords for MathsAtHome in Apple App Store
MathsAtHome tracks 77 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 77 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 53.1, difficulty 42.8.
Tracked keywords
77
0 ranked • 77 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
53.1
Top keyword: play
Avg difficulty
42.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.4
play
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,269
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 83.9
features
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,060
- 74.7
phone
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 450
Unranked opportunities
play
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.2 • Competitors: 1,269
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
features
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.4 • Competitors: 1,060
phone
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 59.2 • Competitors: 450
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
play
Total apps: 5,992 • Major competitors: 1,269
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.2
features
Total apps: 5,134 • Major competitors: 1,060
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.4
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| play | 59 | 100 | 57 | 85 5,992 competing apps Median installs: 263,338 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,269 major competitor apps |
| phone | 58 | 100 | 59 | 75 2,007 competing apps Median installs: 269,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 450 major competitor apps |
| support | 58 | 100 | 56 | 78 2,741 competing apps Median installs: 233,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 515 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| london | 57 | 100 | 30 | 39 54 competing apps Median installs: 232,225 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| never | 58 | 100 | 57 | 80 3,447 competing apps Median installs: 275,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 800 major competitor apps |
| university | 57 | 100 | 31 | 41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| various | 58 | 100 | 50 | 75 2,177 competing apps Median installs: 229,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 374 major competitor apps |
| english | 58 | 100 | 43 | 60 443 competing apps Median installs: 230,525 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 68 major competitor apps |
| stage | 57 | 100 | 37 | 54 246 competing apps Median installs: 239,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| researchers | 56 | 100 | 24 | 32 26 competing apps Median installs: 341,950 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| easily | 58 | 100 | 61 | 80 3,352 competing apps Median installs: 262,062 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 764 major competitor apps |
| simple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,416 competing apps Median installs: 254,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| informed | 58 | 100 | 50 | 61 514 competing apps Median installs: 288,550 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| needed | 57 | 100 | 44 | 57 346 competing apps Median installs: 200,188 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 61 major competitor apps |
| curriculum | 57 | 100 | 28 | 41 67 competing apps Median installs: 238,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| spontaneous | 57 | 100 | 38 | 36 40 competing apps Median installs: 298,088 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| difficulty | 58 | 100 | 41 | 62 550 competing apps Median installs: 248,100 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 121 major competitor apps |
| screen | 58 | 100 | 55 | 73 1,748 competing apps Median installs: 253,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 360 major competitor apps |
| features | 59 | 100 | 60 | 84 5,134 competing apps Median installs: 252,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,060 major competitor apps |
| activities | 58 | 100 | 45 | 64 645 competing apps Median installs: 263,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 130 major competitor apps |
App Description
children’s mathematical development using resources easily available in and around
the home.
The app was co-designed by researchers at University College London with parents
and practitioners. The app is based on the latest evidence on children’s
mathematical development and personalised learning.
The activities are informed by the English national curriculum and Early Years
Foundation Stage framework and has various levels of difficulty for children aged 2
to 6 years old.
The activities are linked to a blog where you find out more about mathematical
development for young children and how the games support their development.
5 features parents liked about the ‘Maths@Home’ app:
1. Ready-to-play activities
2. It fits well into spontaneous playing
3. It prompts parent-child interactions
4. Off-screen time for their children
5. It helps empower parents to support their child’s mathematical abilities
“It encourages you to be interactive with your child”.
“I certainly found that there were things that I would never have thought to have done
that were really simple but actually he really enjoyed it”.
“I read what I needed to do and I then I kind of put the phone away, and I sat with my
child and did the game and I felt encouraged…”