MathsAtHome
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 77 keywords for MathsAtHome in Apple App Store
MathsAtHome tracks 77 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 77 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 41.1.
Tracked keywords
77
0 ranked • 77 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: university
Avg difficulty
41.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.0
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 19
- 64.0
stage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 88
- 67.2
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 96
- 68.4
ideas
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 196
- 68.6
development
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 102
Unranked opportunities
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 19
stage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.0 • Competitors: 88
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.2 • Competitors: 96
ideas
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.7 • Competitors: 196
development
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.5 • Competitors: 102
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,810 • Major competitors: 2,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.4
find
Total apps: 139,093 • Major competitors: 2,450
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
features
Total apps: 116,037 • Major competitors: 1,833
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
using
Total apps: 115,200 • Major competitors: 1,312
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
designed
Total apps: 114,538 • Major competitors: 925
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| play | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 92,191 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,154 major competitor apps |
| phone | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 45,627 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 50 | 82 75,081 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 938 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 114,538 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 925 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 115,200 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,312 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 54 | 86 139,093 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,450 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 54 | 88 190,810 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,547 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 89,242 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,610 major competitor apps |
| london | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,342 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| never | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 67,248 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,111 major competitor apps |
| university | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,679 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| various | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,895 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 591 major competitor apps |
| english | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 20,301 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 130 major competitor apps |
| stage | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,684 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 88 major competitor apps |
| researchers | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 1,035 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 51 | 83 85,713 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,074 major competitor apps |
| simple | 67 | 100 | 51 | 84 98,974 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,237 major competitor apps |
| informed | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 23,207 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 215 major competitor apps |
| needed | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,343 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 96 major competitor apps |
| curriculum | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,230 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 27 major competitor apps |
| spontaneous | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,298 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 17 major competitor apps |
| difficulty | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 13,000 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 198 major competitor apps |
| screen | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 42,481 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 614 major competitor apps |
| features | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 116,037 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,833 major competitor apps |
| activities | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 18,854 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 198 major competitor apps |
App Description
children’s mathematical development using resources easily available in and around
the home.
The app was co-designed by researchers at University College London with parents
and practitioners. The app is based on the latest evidence on children’s
mathematical development and personalised learning.
The activities are informed by the English national curriculum and Early Years
Foundation Stage framework and has various levels of difficulty for children aged 2
to 6 years old.
The activities are linked to a blog where you find out more about mathematical
development for young children and how the games support their development.
5 features parents liked about the ‘Maths@Home’ app:
1. Ready-to-play activities
2. It fits well into spontaneous playing
3. It prompts parent-child interactions
4. Off-screen time for their children
5. It helps empower parents to support their child’s mathematical abilities
“It encourages you to be interactive with your child”.
“I certainly found that there were things that I would never have thought to have done
that were really simple but actually he really enjoyed it”.
“I read what I needed to do and I then I kind of put the phone away, and I sat with my
child and did the game and I felt encouraged…”