HIVEQR
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 135 keywords for HIVEQR in Apple App Store
HIVEQR tracks 135 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 134 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 69.9, difficulty 41.8, best rank 155.
Tracked keywords
135
1 ranked • 134 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 155 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: immediately
Avg difficulty
41.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.9
immediately
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 96
- 66.3
seconds
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 129
- 67.8
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 166
- 64.4
companies
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 69
- 67.2
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 114
Unranked opportunities
immediately
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 96
seconds
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 129
second
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 166
companies
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 69
needed
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 114
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
mobile
Total apps: 120,211 • Major competitors: 1,593
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
create
Total apps: 119,326 • Major competitors: 2,292
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
best
Total apps: 117,438 • Major competitors: 2,620
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
information
Total apps: 112,143 • Major competitors: 1,128
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| functionalities | 71 | 100 | 39 | 55 1,841 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.9 | 238 | 155 | 18 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 117,438 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,620 major competitor apps |
| challenge | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 34,298 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 917 major competitor apps |
| 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 35,952 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 563 major competitor apps | |
| texting | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,341 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 42 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 83,347 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,631 major competitor apps |
| customer | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 28,260 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 442 major competitor apps |
| order | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 60,309 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 792 major competitor apps |
| phone | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 45,627 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 874 major competitor apps |
| place | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 47,069 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 84 112,143 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,128 major competitor apps |
| needs | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 26,038 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 316 major competitor apps |
| valuable | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 14,148 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 156 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 19,941 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| immediately | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,592 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 96 major competitor apps |
| service | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 55,180 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 830 major competitor apps |
| call | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 20,424 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 326 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 120,211 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,593 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 55,996 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 558 major competitor apps |
| request | 72 | 100 | 46 | 70 15,032 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 213 major competitor apps |
| photos | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 38,113 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 633 major competitor apps |
| dispatch | 70 | 100 | 34 | 53 1,469 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| seconds | 73 | 100 | 42 | 66 9,211 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 129 major competitor apps |
| complete | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 65,758 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,215 major competitor apps |
App Description
The current methods of phone calls, Emails and Texting the service request and communicating status until the machine is repaired creates a lot of waste, frustration, and resources. Customers and Service Providers lose billions of dollars a year and valuable Technician time is wasted driving for parts given the lack of information given at the point of the request.
Challenge: These methods do not create analytical data without entering them in a business system. The equipment industry faces many challenges with first call fix rates. Currently 25% to 75% of the time the technician needs to leave for a part and return a second time to repair unit, increasing down time and cost.
Phone Call:
Hitting codes to reach a person, waiting on hold, leaving messages, did they get the message to send me a technician, having to call back to get more machine details needed to open a work order and dispatching a technician.
Email:
Opening an email mobile or waiting until back in the office, typing in the needed info, make, model, serial number, the issue with the machine, is it operating or down, etc. Companies and customers are overwhelmed with so many emails, they get lost as well and often emailing back and forth until the right info is received.
Texting:
This method is the quickest of them all, the challenge is the person working you are sending it to, typing in the unit information, what customer is sending it, are they authorized to place a service request, etc. Often sent to a technician who still needs to place a call to his office to get a work order open.
Hive Quick Response Solution - How It Works (Simplifies with real time status communication)
- Cloud Technology – Real Time Connection, creates Analytical Data
- Scan the equipment encrypted decal with the App pulls correct machine data
- Click if the machine is Operational Yes or No (Allows Prioritizing down equipment)
- Describe Issue as best as possible to inform your service supplier
- Take photos of issue to show the issue (photos become data for future analytics)
- Hit Send and the request is immediately at the service supplier with the right info
- Pre-dispatch planning is now possible to plan parts and technical expertise
- 45 Seconds or less the above is complete by the requester and immediately actionable
Service suppliers should provide this technology