Arkikus - Flaviobriga
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 73 keywords for Arkikus - Flaviobriga in Apple App Store
Arkikus - Flaviobriga tracks 73 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 73 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 51.3, difficulty 38.6.
Tracked keywords
73
0 ranked • 73 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
51.3
Top keyword: experience
Avg difficulty
38.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 83.9
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,134
- 83.2
unique
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,009
- 68.2
action
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 251
- 72.3
digital
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 339
- 77.6
information
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 572
Unranked opportunities
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Competitors: 1,134
unique
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.5 • Competitors: 1,009
action
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 251
digital
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.9 • Competitors: 339
information
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.9 • Competitors: 572
High competition keywords
experience
Total apps: 5,154 • Major competitors: 1,134
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
unique
Total apps: 4,782 • Major competitors: 1,009
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
available
Total apps: 4,074 • Major competitors: 979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.5
mobile
Total apps: 3,947 • Major competitors: 846
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.2
may
Total apps: 3,755 • Major competitors: 871
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| action | 58 | 100 | 49 | 68 1,033 competing apps Median installs: 300,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| experience | 59 | 100 | 59 | 84 5,154 competing apps Median installs: 261,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,134 major competitor apps |
| digital | 58 | 100 | 52 | 72 1,579 competing apps Median installs: 256,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 339 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| content | 58 | 100 | 57 | 76 2,368 competing apps Median installs: 245,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 481 major competitor apps |
| available | 58 | 100 | 64 | 82 4,074 competing apps Median installs: 282,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 979 major competitor apps |
| town | 57 | 100 | 46 | 58 364 competing apps Median installs: 224,112 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 58 | 100 | 53 | 69 1,101 competing apps Median installs: 270,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| group | 58 | 100 | 60 | 64 695 competing apps Median installs: 244,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 151 major competitor apps |
| city | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 877 competing apps Median installs: 255,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| real | 58 | 100 | 59 | 81 3,692 competing apps Median installs: 264,862 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 828 major competitor apps |
| unique experience | 56 | 100 | 28 | 35 35 competing apps Median installs: 244,700 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| original | 58 | 100 | 55 | 70 1,219 competing apps Median installs: 286,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 291 major competitor apps |
| immersive | 58 | 100 | 47 | 65 718 competing apps Median installs: 257,575 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 148 major competitor apps |
| accuracy | 57 | 100 | 36 | 52 200 competing apps Median installs: 229,738 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 42 major competitor apps |
| interpretation | 56 | 100 | 20 | 31 23 competing apps Median installs: 189,175 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| documents | 58 | 100 | 52 | 59 414 competing apps Median installs: 327,962 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 97 major competitor apps |
| show | 58 | 100 | 55 | 74 1,889 competing apps Median installs: 281,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 446 major competitor apps |
| unique | 59 | 100 | 57 | 83 4,782 competing apps Median installs: 253,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,009 major competitor apps |
| future | 58 | 100 | 51 | 69 1,126 competing apps Median installs: 243,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 204 major competitor apps |
| style | 58 | 100 | 50 | 72 1,461 competing apps Median installs: 260,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 324 major competitor apps |
| greatest | 57 | 100 | 48 | 55 282 competing apps Median installs: 288,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 66 major competitor apps |
App Description
The virtual reconstruction included in this app aims to show how the Roman city of Flaviobriga, currently preserved in the subsoil of Castro-Urdiales (Cantabria, Spain), may have looked in the past, in an immersive and unique experience that shows 4th century AD architecture and scenes in a realistic way.
All the digital content in the mobile app has been developed based on real graphic, documentary and archaeological sources for the reconstructed spaces. Where such original documents for particular elements are no longer available, parallel architectural and/or decorative examples from the same period of time, region and style have been used to ensure the greatest historical accuracy possible. The reconstructions included show an interpretation of the historical surroundings designed in conjunction with specialists based on the information available when the app was created. Future investigations may subsequently alter these interpretations.
Acknowledgements: Pedro Rasines del Río, Ángel Astorqui