AutoFill Discovery
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 85 keywords for AutoFill Discovery in Apple App Store
AutoFill Discovery tracks 85 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 85 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 51.0, difficulty 42.6.
Tracked keywords
85
0 ranked • 85 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
51.0
Top keyword: new
Avg difficulty
42.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 91.1
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,341
- 88.4
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,773
- 83.9
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,134
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 85.2
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,236
Unranked opportunities
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Competitors: 2,341
make
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Competitors: 1,773
experience
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.1 • Competitors: 1,134
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 10,701 • Major competitors: 2,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
make
Total apps: 8,094 • Major competitors: 1,773
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
help
Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
experience
Total apps: 5,154 • Major competitors: 1,134
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 59 | 100 | 64 | 91 10,701 competing apps Median installs: 270,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| internal | 57 | 100 | 30 | 44 89 competing apps Median installs: 263,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 18 major competitor apps |
| make | 59 | 100 | 63 | 88 8,094 competing apps Median installs: 266,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,773 major competitor apps |
| whether | 58 | 100 | 59 | 79 3,139 competing apps Median installs: 267,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 715 major competitor apps |
| better | 58 | 100 | 53 | 75 2,000 competing apps Median installs: 250,162 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 450 major competitor apps |
| party | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 842 competing apps Median installs: 274,412 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| support | 58 | 100 | 56 | 78 2,741 competing apps Median installs: 233,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 515 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| experience | 59 | 100 | 59 | 84 5,154 competing apps Median installs: 261,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,134 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| hope | 57 | 100 | 38 | 57 322 competing apps Median installs: 206,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 52 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| provide | 58 | 100 | 49 | 73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 293 major competitor apps |
| apple | 58 | 100 | 58 | 77 2,602 competing apps Median installs: 282,762 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 607 major competitor apps |
| help | 59 | 100 | 61 | 85 5,873 competing apps Median installs: 257,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,236 major competitor apps |
| launch | 58 | 100 | 42 | 60 439 competing apps Median installs: 200,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 66 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| test | 58 | 100 | 50 | 73 1,727 competing apps Median installs: 258,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 389 major competitor apps |
| quickly | 58 | 100 | 56 | 75 1,969 competing apps Median installs: 280,350 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 484 major competitor apps |
| ios | 58 | 100 | 50 | 69 1,128 competing apps Median installs: 238,712 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| everyone | 58 | 100 | 52 | 68 969 competing apps Median installs: 304,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 232 major competitor apps |
| customers | 20 | 100 | 51 | 64 702 competing apps Median installs: 333,038 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 185 major competitor apps |
| discovery | 57 | 100 | 53 | 49 139 competing apps Median installs: 238,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 30 major competitor apps |
| question | 57 | 100 | 40 | 56 309 competing apps Median installs: 244,775 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 55 major competitor apps |
| allows | 58 | 100 | 50 | 75 2,119 competing apps Median installs: 225,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 351 major competitor apps |
App Description
Our customers frequently test new apps and often their first question to Imprivata is whether an app's authentication workflows will work with our respective solutions. In most cases, Imprivata does not have the required 3rd party environments to determine this capability ourselves and making a determination of support can be cumbersome and time consuming.
AutoFill Discovery allows anyone, including our customers, partners, and internal stakeholders to quickly test an app’s compatibility with Apple’s Password AutoFill framework, taking out the guess work and getting customers the answers they need quicker than ever.
Determine the end user experience for Password AutoFill
When using Password AutoFill on iOS an end user may have to tap the screen either once or twice depending on a 3rd party app vendor’s implementation of their application. AutoFill discovery will determine the end user experience and provide links to Apple documentation for how vendors can make the experience even better for end users if not supported or not optimal.
Share your results with us!
Following the successful launch of our compatibility matrix for MDA, we encourage everyone testing internally, with partners, or with customers to send a screenshot of your outcomes to mobile@imprivata.com. With your help we hope to launch GroundControl’s support for iOS Password AutoFill with a comparable matrix highlighting all of the applications that support AutoFill.