SnapCalorie AI Calorie Counter

Developer: Perception Labs, Inc.

Category: Health & Fitness

~45.1K - 90.3K

903 ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 123 keywords for SnapCalorie AI Calorie Counter in Apple App Store

Developer: Perception Labs, Inc. Category: health_and_fitness Rating: 4.71

SnapCalorie AI Calorie Counter tracks 123 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 123 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 51.3, difficulty 41.3.

Tracked keywords

123

0 ranked • 123 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

51.3

Top keyword: way

Avg difficulty

41.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

way

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,067
83.0
help

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,236
85.2
like

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,767
87.6
every

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,637
86.9
unique

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,009
83.2

Unranked opportunities

way

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Competitors: 1,067
help

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236
like

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,767
every

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.5 • Competitors: 1,637
unique

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.5 • Competitors: 1,009

High competition keywords

like

Total apps: 7,508 • Major competitors: 1,767

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
every

Total apps: 6,989 • Major competitors: 1,637

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.5
help

Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
unique

Total apps: 4,782 • Major competitors: 1,009

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
way

Total apps: 4,665 • Major competitors: 1,067

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
calorie counter	56	100	24	30 21 competing apps Median installs: 188,950 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	4 major competitor apps
users	58	100	52	75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	430 major competitor apps
place	58	100	54	73 1,689 competing apps Median installs: 247,300 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	371 major competitor apps
sensor	57	100	28	42 71 competing apps Median installs: 162,650 Avg rating: 4.4	—	—	9 major competitor apps
scan	20	100	52	67 906 competing apps Median installs: 291,350 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	234 major competitor apps
simply	58	100	52	73 1,724 competing apps Median installs: 235,888 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	356 major competitor apps
information	58	100	57	78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	572 major competitor apps
team	58	100	52	75 1,972 competing apps Median installs: 284,662 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	445 major competitor apps
way	59	100	60	83 4,665 competing apps Median installs: 271,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,067 major competitor apps
food	58	100	52	68 985 competing apps Median installs: 270,500 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	226 major competitor apps
provide	58	100	49	73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	293 major competitor apps
dish	57	100	27	38 47 competing apps Median installs: 232,375 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	11 major competitor apps
help	59	100	61	85 5,873 competing apps Median installs: 257,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,236 major competitor apps
note	58	100	48	64 676 competing apps Median installs: 256,250 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	138 major competitor apps
collected	57	100	37	49 146 competing apps Median installs: 197,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	28 major competitor apps
volume	57	100	42	55 259 competing apps Median installs: 186,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	45 major competitor apps
picture	58	100	49	66 847 competing apps Median installs: 250,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	178 major competitor apps
error	57	100	24	37 42 competing apps Median installs: 233,000 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	7 major competitor apps
kitchen	57	100	38	52 196 competing apps Median installs: 259,750 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	44 major competitor apps
founded	57	100	31	42 70 competing apps Median installs: 155,600 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	14 major competitor apps
vision	57	100	37	53 210 competing apps Median installs: 254,300 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	38 major competitor apps
test	58	100	50	73 1,727 competing apps Median installs: 258,500 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	389 major competitor apps
accurate	58	100	46	66 792 competing apps Median installs: 240,225 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	140 major competitor apps
counter	57	100	36	49 147 competing apps Median installs: 219,250 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	32 major competitor apps
pro	58	100	48	70 1,222 competing apps Median installs: 250,738 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	233 major competitor apps

App Description

Founded by ex-Google AI researchers, SnapCalorie’s photo calorie counter is the easiest and fastest way to track your diet and nutrition. Simply snap a photo or record a quick voice note to log an entire meal or day. Our AI algorithm will instantly provide you with calories, macros, and over 30 micronutrients based on verified USDA database values.

Do you only track calories?

No! We track all macronutrients and over 100 micronutrients. SnapCalorie's AI nutritionist can help you achieve a diverse set of dietary goals.

How accurate is it?

Our photo calorie counter is approximately twice as accurate as visually estimating portion sizes.

Our voice note algorithm is as accurate as the information you give it. Dictating gram values and ingredients as you place items on a food scale allows you to log your food with laboratory-grade precision and NO TYPING.

Don’t want to use a kitchen scale?

Our photo calorie counter can scan the exact volume of your food with the LiDAR depth sensor on your iPhone Pro or our voice note feature can assume average portion sizes if not specified.

How do you measure accuracy?

We were founded by a team of ex-Google AI researchers who co-founded Google Lens and Cloud Vision API. Our AI algorithm is the only one backed by peer-reviewed academic research. In our research, Nutrition5k, we collected a test dataset of 5,000 unique dishes, weighing every ingredient that went onto the plate. To evaluate our algorithm's accuracy, we ran the photo calorie counter on this dataset and compared the results to the true nutrient values.

Average expected error for a 500 calorie dish is +/- 80 calories on an iPhone Pro and +/- 130 on a regular iPhone. By comparison users eyeballing portion size visually were +/- 265 calories on average.

How does it work?

Snap a picture with the photo calorie counter and our AI starts by identifying the different types of food and where they are on the dish, like a nutritionist would. Next, if you have an iPhone Pro, we measure the food's volume with the LiDAR depth sensor. Our AI estimates portion size visually for phones without a depth sensor. Finally, we look up the nutritional values for that type of food and portion size in a trusted database (e.g., USDA) and sum up the totals for you!

If anything looks incorrect, you can fix it yourself OR send it back to our team of nutrition experts for review.