Bend deduction and Flat length

Category: Tools

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 43 keywords for Bend deduction and Flat length in Apple App Store

Developer: Bhavinkumar Satashiya Category: tools

Bend deduction and Flat length tracks 43 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 43 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 54.6, difficulty 37.5.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 43 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

54.6

Top keyword: time

Avg difficulty

37.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,805
88.7
reliable

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 81
59.8
various

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 374
75.5
quickly

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 484
74.5
part

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 247
69.3

Unranked opportunities

time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
reliable

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 81
various

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.5 • Competitors: 374
quickly

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 56.2 • Competitors: 484
part

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 54.3 • Competitors: 247

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
various

Total apps: 2,177 • Major competitors: 374

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.5
trial

Total apps: 2,139 • Major competitors: 416

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.4
work

Total apps: 2,084 • Major competitors: 452

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.6
quickly

Total apps: 1,969 • Major competitors: 484

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
sheet	57	100	28	40 57 competing apps Median installs: 201,900 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	14 major competitor apps
reliable	58	100	45	60 440 competing apps Median installs: 234,312 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	81 major competitor apps
time	59	100	63	89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,805 major competitor apps
piece	57	100	37	54 252 competing apps Median installs: 284,875 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	57 major competitor apps
various	58	100	50	75 2,177 competing apps Median installs: 229,325 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	374 major competitor apps
blank	57	100	30	44 90 competing apps Median installs: 217,850 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	19 major competitor apps
tests	20	100	39	54 232 competing apps Median installs: 269,488 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	59 major competitor apps
quickly	58	100	56	75 1,969 competing apps Median installs: 280,350 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	484 major competitor apps
part	58	100	54	69 1,154 competing apps Median installs: 268,538 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	247 major competitor apps
trial	58	100	50	75 2,139 competing apps Median installs: 247,525 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	416 major competitor apps
work	58	100	53	75 2,084 competing apps Median installs: 265,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	452 major competitor apps
calculation	20	100	33	42 70 competing apps Median installs: 268,688 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	18 major competitor apps
done	58	100	48	62 564 competing apps Median installs: 250,900 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	120 major competitor apps
getting	58	100	49	67 876 competing apps Median installs: 281,812 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	192 major competitor apps
lot	58	100	45	65 726 competing apps Median installs: 212,838 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	121 major competitor apps
starting	58	100	45	63 589 competing apps Median installs: 269,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	130 major competitor apps
often	57	100	38	56 296 competing apps Median installs: 226,588 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	61 major competitor apps
size	58	100	44	62 569 competing apps Median installs: 260,475 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	124 major competitor apps
inside	58	100	45	62 538 competing apps Median installs: 275,788 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	130 major competitor apps
additional	58	100	52	70 1,201 competing apps Median installs: 281,500 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	271 major competitor apps
designer	57	100	38	53 220 competing apps Median installs: 242,188 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	52 major competitor apps
problems	57	100	40	57 324 competing apps Median installs: 223,312 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	57 major competitor apps
laser	20	100	32	44 86 competing apps Median installs: 303,950 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	24 major competitor apps
material	57	100	33	48 132 competing apps Median installs: 211,575 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	20 major competitor apps
initial	57	100	35	52 192 competing apps Median installs: 264,650 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	32 major competitor apps

App Description

One of the most common problems in bending is the calculation of bend deduction. Determining the size of the piece to be cut starting from the finished measurements is often done by trial and error, requiring a lot of additional work not only for the press brake operator but also for the designer and the laser cutter operator. Time and material are wasted on various tests before getting a reliable value.

With this app, you quickly get the sheet metal bend deduction, and therefore the sheet metal blank initial flat length, from the finished part measurements.

You only have to insert interior angle, flange lengths, K factor, inside radius, and material thickness.