Get Into Med School

Get Into Med School icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 100 keywords for Get Into Med School in Apple App Store

Developer: King of the Curve, LLC Category: medical

Get Into Med School tracks 100 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 100 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 38.2.

Tracked keywords

100

0  ranked •  100  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.1

Top keyword: competitive

Avg difficulty

38.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • competitive

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —

    Competitors: 114

    65.6
  • address

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 82

    67.6
  • someone

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

    Competitors: 79

    67.5
  • reduce

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —

    Competitors: 64

    68.5
  • category

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —

    Competitors: 43

    64.6

Unranked opportunities

  • competitive

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 114

  • address

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 82

  • someone

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 79

  • reduce

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 64

  • category

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 43

High competition keywords

  • make

    Total apps: 161,088 • Major competitors: 1,622

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8

  • easy

    Total apps: 143,308 • Major competitors: 1,130

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.1

  • create

    Total apps: 116,377 • Major competitors: 1,225

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5

  • using

    Total apps: 116,194 • Major competitors: 808

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3

  • way

    Total apps: 105,111 • Major competitors: 1,085

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
level681004879

50,636 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.2

670

major competitor apps

competitive731004066

8,225 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.3

114

major competitor apps

single691004676

36,459 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.1

313

major competitor apps

order681004980

59,249 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.3

468

major competitor apps

easy651005286

143,308 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.1

1,130

major competitor apps

make651005387

161,088 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.2

1,622

major competitor apps

whether671005083

91,020 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.3

615

major competitor apps

medical711004372

18,851 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.2

61

major competitor apps

used681004879

50,993 competing apps

Median installs: 50

Avg rating: 4.0

251

major competitor apps

profile721004371

17,217 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.2

153

major competitor apps

created701004574

26,685 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.2

134

major competitor apps

list691004777

40,056 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.1

256

major competitor apps

way661005184

105,111 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.2

1,085

major competitor apps

using661005185

116,194 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.1

808

major competitor apps

account671005082

79,798 competing apps

Median installs: 175

Avg rating: 4.2

1,107

major competitor apps

score711004473

21,622 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.2

272

major competitor apps

small711004473

22,809 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.2

161

major competitor apps

helping711004372

18,891 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.3

119

major competitor apps

accurate711004473

23,439 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.2

145

major competitor apps

create661005185

116,377 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.2

1,225

major competitor apps

contain721003660

4,041 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.1

36

major competitor apps

apply721004370

14,546 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.1

191

major competitor apps

become691004778

44,850 competing apps

Median installs: 125

Avg rating: 4.1

637

major competitor apps

much681004879

54,467 competing apps

Median installs: 100

Avg rating: 4.2

516

major competitor apps

generate711004372

20,091 competing apps

Median installs: 75

Avg rating: 4.2

94

major competitor apps

100 keywords
1 of 4

App Description

The LizzyM System

This system was originally created as a supplement to, not a replacement for, the already widely-utilized LizzyM scoring system. As a reference, the LizzyM score is defined as (GPA*10)+MCAT and may contain a +1 or -1 modifier in certain situations. The applicant's LizzyM score is then compared to the LizzyM score for a school to determine whether or not the applicant is statistically competitive for that school. However, the inherent simplicity of the LizzyM score, while making it quick and easy to generate and apply, also creates problems endemic to systems that reduce and generalize. The two major simplifications are the reduction of an entire application to two (already numerical) metrics and the assumption that the LizzyM score accounts for the majority of, if not all of, the variability attributed to selectivity.

While there is merit to these assumptions, which is why the LizzyM score is so widely used, there are also deficiencies that need to be addressed in order to create a more accurate system for assessing an application. One of these deficiencies is that certain schools with similar LizzyM schools may be in very different levels of competitiveness. For example, although UVA and Duke have identical LizzyM scores, it is clear that Duke is a much more selective school than UVA. Additionally, small differences in LizzyM score become significant when using this metric to assess competitiveness for two similar schools. For example, Duke has a LizzyM score of 75, while Yale has a LizzyM score of 76; both schools are similarly selective, but someone might (very mistakenly) advise a applicant with a 3.9/36 that they are more competitive for Duke than they are for Yale. Finally, the LizzyM score is used as a way to tell if someone is statistically competitive for a single school and is significantly less useful for helping an applicant come up with a list of schools.

The Applicant Rating System - Overview

The WedgeDawg Applicant Rating System (ARS) was created to address these deficiencies. It takes into account most of the factors that make up an application to medical school, gives an applicant a separate score for each one, and then gives an applicant a numerical rating. This numerical rating is then translated to a category level and a profile of schools to apply to is created based on that category.

King of the Curve does not own