Get Into Med School

Get Into Med School
Developer: King of the
Category: Medical
Get Into Med School icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 99 keywords for Get Into Med School in Apple App Store

Developer: King of the Curve, LLC Category: medical

Get Into Med School tracks 99 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 99 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 48.1, difficulty 39.7.

Tracked keywords

99

0  ranked •  99  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

48.1

Top keyword: easy

Avg difficulty

39.7

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • easy

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,246

    85.2
  • make

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,773

    88.4
  • way

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,067

    83.0
  • account

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,073

    84.1
  • create

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.6 • Rank —

    Competitors: 1,155

    84.7

Unranked opportunities

  • easy

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 59.0 • Competitors: 1,246

  • make

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Competitors: 1,773

  • way

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Competitors: 1,067

  • account

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Competitors: 1,073

  • create

    Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.6 • Competitors: 1,155

High competition keywords

  • make

    Total apps: 8,094 • Major competitors: 1,773

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7

  • easy

    Total apps: 5,849 • Major competitors: 1,246

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.0

  • create

    Total apps: 5,537 • Major competitors: 1,155

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.6

  • account

    Total apps: 5,212 • Major competitors: 1,073

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.5

  • way

    Total apps: 4,665 • Major competitors: 1,067

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
level581005478

2,734 competing apps

Median installs: 274,625

Avg rating: 4.6

638

major competitor apps

competitive201004659

393 competing apps

Median installs: 289,300

Avg rating: 4.7

107

major competitor apps

single581005072

1,511 competing apps

Median installs: 234,575

Avg rating: 4.6

294

major competitor apps

order201006173

1,756 competing apps

Median installs: 288,212

Avg rating: 4.7

456

major competitor apps

easy591005985

5,849 competing apps

Median installs: 250,625

Avg rating: 4.6

1,246

major competitor apps

make591006388

8,094 competing apps

Median installs: 266,850

Avg rating: 4.6

1,773

major competitor apps

whether581005979

3,139 competing apps

Median installs: 267,650

Avg rating: 4.6

715

major competitor apps

medical581003959

418 competing apps

Median installs: 192,125

Avg rating: 4.7

60

major competitor apps

used581005372

1,494 competing apps

Median installs: 237,800

Avg rating: 4.6

279

major competitor apps

profile581005963

624 competing apps

Median installs: 303,488

Avg rating: 4.6

154

major competitor apps

created581004767

953 competing apps

Median installs: 213,175

Avg rating: 4.6

153

major competitor apps

list581005270

1,187 competing apps

Median installs: 244,150

Avg rating: 4.6

251

major competitor apps

way591006083

4,665 competing apps

Median installs: 271,100

Avg rating: 4.6

1,067

major competitor apps

using581006183

4,473 competing apps

Median installs: 247,200

Avg rating: 4.6

924

major competitor apps

account591006184

5,212 competing apps

Median installs: 257,662

Avg rating: 4.6

1,073

major competitor apps

score201005268

977 competing apps

Median installs: 314,100

Avg rating: 4.7

264

major competitor apps

small581005166

862 competing apps

Median installs: 228,538

Avg rating: 4.7

155

major competitor apps

helping581004563

640 competing apps

Median installs: 235,312

Avg rating: 4.7

128

major competitor apps

accurate581004666

792 competing apps

Median installs: 240,225

Avg rating: 4.6

140

major competitor apps

create591006185

5,537 competing apps

Median installs: 251,325

Avg rating: 4.6

1,155

major competitor apps

contain571003750

158 competing apps

Median installs: 282,450

Avg rating: 4.6

39

major competitor apps

apply581005566

829 competing apps

Median installs: 286,275

Avg rating: 4.7

183

major competitor apps

become581005479

3,091 competing apps

Median installs: 275,100

Avg rating: 4.6

678

major competitor apps

much581005577

2,669 competing apps

Median installs: 241,125

Avg rating: 4.6

569

major competitor apps

generate581004461

523 competing apps

Median installs: 229,975

Avg rating: 4.6

91

major competitor apps

99 keywords
1 of 4

App Description

The LizzyM System

This system was originally created as a supplement to, not a replacement for, the already widely-utilized LizzyM scoring system. As a reference, the LizzyM score is defined as (GPA*10)+MCAT and may contain a +1 or -1 modifier in certain situations. The applicant's LizzyM score is then compared to the LizzyM score for a school to determine whether or not the applicant is statistically competitive for that school. However, the inherent simplicity of the LizzyM score, while making it quick and easy to generate and apply, also creates problems endemic to systems that reduce and generalize. The two major simplifications are the reduction of an entire application to two (already numerical) metrics and the assumption that the LizzyM score accounts for the majority of, if not all of, the variability attributed to selectivity.

While there is merit to these assumptions, which is why the LizzyM score is so widely used, there are also deficiencies that need to be addressed in order to create a more accurate system for assessing an application. One of these deficiencies is that certain schools with similar LizzyM schools may be in very different levels of competitiveness. For example, although UVA and Duke have identical LizzyM scores, it is clear that Duke is a much more selective school than UVA. Additionally, small differences in LizzyM score become significant when using this metric to assess competitiveness for two similar schools. For example, Duke has a LizzyM score of 75, while Yale has a LizzyM score of 76; both schools are similarly selective, but someone might (very mistakenly) advise a applicant with a 3.9/36 that they are more competitive for Duke than they are for Yale. Finally, the LizzyM score is used as a way to tell if someone is statistically competitive for a single school and is significantly less useful for helping an applicant come up with a list of schools.

The Applicant Rating System - Overview

The WedgeDawg Applicant Rating System (ARS) was created to address these deficiencies. It takes into account most of the factors that make up an application to medical school, gives an applicant a separate score for each one, and then gives an applicant a numerical rating. This numerical rating is then translated to a category level and a profile of schools to apply to is created based on that category.

King of the Curve does not own