Get Into Med School

Get Into Med School icon

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 104 keywords for Get Into Med School in Apple App Store

Developer: King of the Curve, LLC Category: medical Rating: 4.41

Get Into Med School tracks 104 keywords (4 keywords rank; 100 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 39.5, best rank 92.

Tracked keywords

104

4  ranked •  100  not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

0%

Best rank 92 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.2

Top keyword: competitive

Avg difficulty

39.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

  • competitive

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Rank —

    Competitors: 190

    66.3
  • address

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —

    Competitors: 159

    67.7
  • someone

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —

    Competitors: 154

    66.8
  • reduce

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —

    Competitors: 150

    67.9
  • category

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —

    Competitors: 91

    65.1

Unranked opportunities

  • competitive

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.1 • Competitors: 190

  • address

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 159

  • someone

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 154

  • reduce

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 150

  • category

    Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 91

High competition keywords

  • make

    Total apps: 158,924 • Major competitors: 2,938

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.6

  • easy

    Total apps: 141,512 • Major competitors: 2,053

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0

  • create

    Total apps: 130,850 • Major competitors: 2,321

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5

  • way

    Total apps: 115,758 • Major competitors: 1,943

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3

  • using

    Total apps: 114,639 • Major competitors: 1,562

    Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

Major Competitors
eligibility701003949

834 competing apps

Median installs: 1,050

Avg rating: 3.9

9392

54

major competitor apps

admission701003150

1,020 competing apps

Median installs: 200

Avg rating: 3.9

9292

5

major competitor apps

applying711003455

2,102 competing apps

Median installs: 450

Avg rating: 4.1

137137

28

major competitor apps

waitlist711003355

1,919 competing apps

Median installs: 300

Avg rating: 4.8

148148

15

major competitor apps

level681005079

55,867 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.1

1,185

major competitor apps

competitive731004466

9,734 competing apps

Median installs: 461

Avg rating: 4.1

190

major competitor apps

single691004877

41,009 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.1

614

major competitor apps

order681005180

66,456 competing apps

Median installs: 444

Avg rating: 4.1

801

major competitor apps

easy661005386

141,512 competing apps

Median installs: 450

Avg rating: 4.1

2,053

major competitor apps

make651005586

158,924 competing apps

Median installs: 476

Avg rating: 4.1

2,938

major competitor apps

whether671005182

89,248 competing apps

Median installs: 400

Avg rating: 4.2

1,093

major competitor apps

medical711004472

21,735 competing apps

Median installs: 350

Avg rating: 4.1

143

major competitor apps

used691004978

50,542 competing apps

Median installs: 350

Avg rating: 4.0

503

major competitor apps

profile711004771

19,947 competing apps

Median installs: 400

Avg rating: 4.1

292

major competitor apps

created711004573

26,301 competing apps

Median installs: 400

Avg rating: 4.1

303

major competitor apps

list691004877

43,625 competing apps

Median installs: 350

Avg rating: 4.0

500

major competitor apps

way661005384

115,758 competing apps

Median installs: 500

Avg rating: 4.1

1,943

major competitor apps

using661005384

114,639 competing apps

Median installs: 450

Avg rating: 4.0

1,562

major competitor apps

account671005382

87,059 competing apps

Median installs: 950

Avg rating: 4.1

2,135

major competitor apps

score711004673

23,635 competing apps

Median installs: 450

Avg rating: 4.1

438

major competitor apps

small711004773

25,842 competing apps

Median installs: 450

Avg rating: 4.1

356

major competitor apps

helping721004471

18,458 competing apps

Median installs: 400

Avg rating: 4.2

211

major competitor apps

accurate701004674

27,865 competing apps

Median installs: 450

Avg rating: 4.1

328

major competitor apps

create661005585

130,850 competing apps

Median installs: 550

Avg rating: 4.1

2,321

major competitor apps

contain721003760

4,017 competing apps

Median installs: 400

Avg rating: 4.0

63

major competitor apps

104 keywords
1 of 5

App Description

The LizzyM System

This system was originally created as a supplement to, not a replacement for, the already widely-utilized LizzyM scoring system. As a reference, the LizzyM score is defined as (GPA*10)+MCAT and may contain a +1 or -1 modifier in certain situations. The applicant's LizzyM score is then compared to the LizzyM score for a school to determine whether or not the applicant is statistically competitive for that school. However, the inherent simplicity of the LizzyM score, while making it quick and easy to generate and apply, also creates problems endemic to systems that reduce and generalize. The two major simplifications are the reduction of an entire application to two (already numerical) metrics and the assumption that the LizzyM score accounts for the majority of, if not all of, the variability attributed to selectivity.

While there is merit to these assumptions, which is why the LizzyM score is so widely used, there are also deficiencies that need to be addressed in order to create a more accurate system for assessing an application. One of these deficiencies is that certain schools with similar LizzyM schools may be in very different levels of competitiveness. For example, although UVA and Duke have identical LizzyM scores, it is clear that Duke is a much more selective school than UVA. Additionally, small differences in LizzyM score become significant when using this metric to assess competitiveness for two similar schools. For example, Duke has a LizzyM score of 75, while Yale has a LizzyM score of 76; both schools are similarly selective, but someone might (very mistakenly) advise a applicant with a 3.9/36 that they are more competitive for Duke than they are for Yale. Finally, the LizzyM score is used as a way to tell if someone is statistically competitive for a single school and is significantly less useful for helping an applicant come up with a list of schools.

The Applicant Rating System - Overview

The WedgeDawg Applicant Rating System (ARS) was created to address these deficiencies. It takes into account most of the factors that make up an application to medical school, gives an applicant a separate score for each one, and then gives an applicant a numerical rating. This numerical rating is then translated to a category level and a profile of schools to apply to is created based on that category.

King of the Curve does not own