SoilPlastic
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 119 keywords for SoilPlastic in Apple App Store
SoilPlastic tracks 119 keywords (2 keywords rank; 117 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 37.5, best rank 15.
Tracked keywords
119
2 ranked • 117 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 15 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: productivity
Avg difficulty
37.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.5
productivity
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 70
- 65.4
combination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 145
- 67.9
functions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 102
- 67.7
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 94
- 68.6
development
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 125
Unranked opportunities
productivity
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 70
combination
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 145
functions
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 102
project
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 94
development
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 125
High competition keywords
make
Total apps: 159,506 • Major competitors: 2,928
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
like
Total apps: 143,203 • Major competitors: 3,240
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
different
Total apps: 95,103 • Major competitors: 1,687
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
even
Total apps: 81,181 • Major competitors: 1,850
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
many
Total apps: 77,117 • Major competitors: 1,352
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| soil | 69 | 100 | 30 | 47 664 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | 15 | 15 | 7 major competitor apps |
| plastic | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 1,031 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 36 | 36 | 6 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 52,042 competing apps Median installs: 583 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,181 major competitor apps |
| productivity | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 7,175 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 70 major competitor apps |
| changes | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 13,260 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 159,506 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,928 major competitor apps |
| better | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 41,612 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 716 major competitor apps |
| range | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 37,834 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 559 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 55,812 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 944 major competitor apps |
| wide range | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 16,391 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 232 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 55,996 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 558 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 25,749 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| various | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,881 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 723 major competitor apps |
| combination | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,052 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 145 major competitor apps |
| services | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 37,828 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 516 major competitor apps |
| small | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 23,426 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 348 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,215 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 89 major competitor apps |
| citizen | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 968 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| related | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 20,290 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 230 major competitor apps |
| many | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 77,117 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,352 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 45,237 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 631 major competitor apps |
| presence | 72 | 100 | 37 | 59 3,336 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| informed | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 23,209 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 244 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 56 | 86 143,203 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,240 major competitor apps |
| functions | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,489 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 102 major competitor apps |
App Description
This emerging risk has prompted first studies that confirmed the high potential of accumulation of MP in soils causing changes in physico-chemical soil properties. Consequently, this can cause alternation of soil functions such as soil water dynamics and ultimately affect related ecosystem services (ESS) like nutrient cycling, plant growth, and soil biodiversity, which have unmeasured impacts on the economy of the farm. These effects could be even magnified with the presence of MP in combination of other soil pollutants, such as pesticides and veterinary drugs or plastic additives (e.g. dyes), potentially exhibiting synergistic effects.
Within the EU research project ‘Minagris’ these interactive mechanisms are explored and documented. This App /’SoilPlastic’ motivates and engages various stakeholders to contribute to this process by observing and documenting plastic residues/littering in and on soils, submitting anonymized content to a global database. The aim is to identify needs, improve farmer and citizen awareness, provide practitioners with scientifically sound guidance on the impact of different plastic uses and inputs on soil ecosystems – enabling them to make informed decisions – and joint development of novel strategies for reducing plastic contamination. Additionally, with the observed data, a better understanding of any potentially harmful impacts of plastic debris to soil functions, soil biodiversity, related ESS, agricultural productivity at the field level, and related socio-economic consequences at farm level is provided.
The App is running on the SPOTTERON Citizen Science Platform at www.spotteron.net