Appendiceal Pathology
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 54 keywords for Appendiceal Pathology in Apple App Store
Appendiceal Pathology tracks 54 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 54 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 47.6, difficulty 38.4.
Tracked keywords
54
0 ranked • 54 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
47.6
Top keyword: find
Avg difficulty
38.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 86.3
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,481
- 83.2
world
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,016
- 75.1
card
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 57.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 509
- 70.9
health
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 307
- 66.9
focus
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 179
Unranked opportunities
find
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.8 • Competitors: 1,481
world
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.7 • Competitors: 1,016
card
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 57.6 • Competitors: 509
health
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Competitors: 307
focus
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 179
High competition keywords
find
Total apps: 6,521 • Major competitors: 1,481
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.8
world
Total apps: 4,763 • Major competitors: 1,016
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
different
Total apps: 4,440 • Major competitors: 823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
us
Total apps: 4,260 • Major competitors: 915
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
designed
Total apps: 3,407 • Major competitors: 624
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| card | 58 | 100 | 58 | 75 2,087 competing apps Median installs: 269,825 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 509 major competitor apps |
| health | 58 | 100 | 51 | 71 1,361 competing apps Median installs: 248,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 307 major competitor apps |
| focus | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 906 competing apps Median installs: 231,512 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 179 major competitor apps |
| organization | 57 | 100 | 40 | 49 152 competing apps Median installs: 255,750 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| image | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 796 competing apps Median installs: 225,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 142 major competitor apps |
| welcome | 58 | 100 | 51 | 73 1,721 competing apps Median installs: 240,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 342 major competitor apps |
| find | 59 | 100 | 64 | 86 6,521 competing apps Median installs: 264,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,481 major competitor apps |
| international | 58 | 100 | 53 | 62 549 competing apps Median installs: 271,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 113 major competitor apps |
| university | 57 | 100 | 31 | 41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| volume | 57 | 100 | 42 | 55 259 competing apps Median installs: 186,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| group | 58 | 100 | 60 | 64 695 competing apps Median installs: 244,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 151 major competitor apps |
| surface | 57 | 100 | 32 | 46 102 competing apps Median installs: 223,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| series | 58 | 100 | 46 | 63 626 competing apps Median installs: 242,850 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 124 major competitor apps |
| know | 58 | 100 | 60 | 78 2,679 competing apps Median installs: 276,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 627 major competitor apps |
| please | 58 | 100 | 53 | 78 2,739 competing apps Median installs: 250,125 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 552 major competitor apps |
| different | 58 | 100 | 56 | 82 4,440 competing apps Median installs: 240,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 823 major competitor apps |
| world | 59 | 100 | 58 | 83 4,763 competing apps Median installs: 263,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,016 major competitor apps |
| th | 57 | 100 | 42 | 55 278 competing apps Median installs: 217,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 53 major competitor apps |
| based | 58 | 100 | 58 | 79 3,039 competing apps Median installs: 256,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 697 major competitor apps |
| flash | 57 | 100 | 40 | 53 231 competing apps Median installs: 240,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| practicing | 57 | 100 | 37 | 47 117 competing apps Median installs: 214,500 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| well | 58 | 100 | 49 | 72 1,543 competing apps Median installs: 241,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 296 major competitor apps |
| chosen | 58 | 100 | 40 | 60 432 competing apps Median installs: 244,788 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 69 major competitor apps |
App Description
AUTHORS: Jacqueline E. Birkness-Gartman, Elizabeth A. Montgomery, and Kiyoko Oshima
SERIES EDITORS: Toby C. Cornish, Norman J. Barker, and Ralph H. Hruban
The Johns Hopkins Atlas of Appendiceal Pathology is the eighth teaching app in our series from the Johns Hopkins University Department of Pathology. This app is designed to teach residents, fellows, and practicing pathologists the pathology of the appendix. The app covers non-neoplastic and neoplastic appendiceal pathology, with a focus on appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. We recognize that the terminology for appendiceal mucinous neoplasms can be daunting for trainees as well as practicing pathologists, as there are several different classification systems. We have chosen to primarily use the World Health Organization classification system (5th edition), but have included synonymous terms used by the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) where appropriate. We have included three modules in the app: a searchable image atlas, a flash card module, and an image-based quiz.
We welcome your feedback. Please e-mail Dr. Hruban (rhruban@jhmi.edu) or Dr. Jacqueline Birkness (jbirkne1@jhmi.edu). If you find an error, please let us know so we can correct it.