ENRICHERS
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 126 keywords for ENRICHERS in Apple App Store
ENRICHERS tracks 126 keywords (3 keywords rank; 123 need traction). Key metrics: 33% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 38.9, best rank 3.
Tracked keywords
126
3 ranked • 123 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
33%
Best rank 3 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: collaboration
Avg difficulty
38.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.2
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 66.9
clients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 74
- 64.2
stage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 97
- 68.1
minute
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 233
- 67.8
term
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 170
Unranked opportunities
collaboration
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 60
clients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.7 • Competitors: 74
stage
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 97
minute
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Competitors: 233
term
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 170
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 181,163 • Major competitors: 2,662
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
choose
Total apps: 89,645 • Major competitors: 1,775
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.0
support
Total apps: 83,360 • Major competitors: 1,121
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
us
Total apps: 80,345 • Major competitors: 1,546
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
based
Total apps: 79,330 • Major competitors: 1,056
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| enriching | 71 | 100 | 33 | 54 1,737 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | 3 | 3 | 22 major competitor apps |
| enrich | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,372 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | 21 | 17 | 34 major competitor apps |
| enriched | 70 | 100 | 31 | 48 754 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 21 | 21 | 16 major competitor apps |
| top | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 46,690 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| networking | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,126 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 73 | 100 | 44 | 63 6,341 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| investing | 71 | 100 | 37 | 55 2,112 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 50 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 83,360 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,121 major competitor apps |
| contact | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 63,348 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 751 major competitor apps |
| events | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 35,777 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 473 major competitor apps |
| innovation | 72 | 100 | 36 | 58 3,279 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
| choose | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 89,645 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,775 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,830 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 560 major competitor apps |
| clients | 73 | 100 | 41 | 67 10,612 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 74 major competitor apps |
| program | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,525 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 230 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 67,617 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,397 major competitor apps |
| score | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 23,635 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 438 major competitor apps |
| listen | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 27,415 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 343 major competitor apps |
| mission | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 16,895 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 209 major competitor apps |
| small | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 25,842 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 356 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 181,163 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,662 major competitor apps |
| around | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 49,539 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,035 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 48,465 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 599 major competitor apps |
| managed | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 14,250 competing apps Median installs: 1,150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 438 major competitor apps |
| grow | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 17,086 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 327 major competitor apps |
App Description
NGI Enrichers, also funded by the European Commission, as a complementary fellowship program focusing on European researchers and early stage innovators looking for collaboration opportunities in the USA, a lot around research universities.
These two programs co-managed by the Small Business Development Center (SBDC) at Temple University, based in Philadelphia, PA, support a global community of ‘Enrichers’ made of startups, corporations, research labs and universities representatives and mentors and investors actively participating.
Moreover, the programs are also meant to support in the middle term US startups and SMEs to become global, scale and enter the European market.
During the Silicon Valley Funding Summit at CES (one day before CES), we invite investors and startup ecosystems stakeholders to speak and judge startups pitching for 120/150 minute sessions.
We select the investors who apply as judges. They introduce themselves and then listen to the pitches, and give their feedback to the entrepreneurs. They will score the pitches and will choose he top 5 presentations. The app facilitates the scoring.
The ones judging must be actively engaged in investing their own funds or making decisions for their firms or organizations, and not be solely advisors. These are:
Angels
Strategic investors
Family offices partners
Venture capital partners
Private equity partners
Investment bankers
Incubators or Accelerators executives
Micro-funds managers
Crypto investors
During the week