Aerial Sprays
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 96 keywords for Aerial Sprays in Apple App Store
Aerial Sprays tracks 96 keywords (2 keywords rank; 94 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.6, difficulty 40.8, best rank 13.
Tracked keywords
96
2 ranked • 94 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 13 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.6
Top keyword: volume
Avg difficulty
40.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.0
volume
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 84
- 68.6
series
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 255
- 66.8
functionality
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 101
- 64.8
return
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 125
- 66.7
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 115
Unranked opportunities
volume
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 84
series
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.8 • Competitors: 255
functionality
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 101
return
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 125
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.0 • Competitors: 115
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
make
Total apps: 159,506 • Major competitors: 2,928
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
using
Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
available
Total apps: 89,249 • Major competitors: 1,834
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
easily
Total apps: 85,676 • Major competitors: 1,259
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aerial | 70 | 100 | 31 | 50 977 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | 13 | 13 | 17 major competitor apps |
| agricultural | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 942 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | 110 | 110 | 2 major competitor apps |
| device | 69 | 100 | 50 | 79 50,271 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 843 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 159,506 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,928 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 67,459 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,296 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 40,413 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 488 major competitor apps |
| product | 71 | 100 | 46 | 73 22,970 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 300 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 40,927 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 862 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 50,682 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 502 major competitor apps |
| protect | 72 | 100 | 44 | 70 15,282 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 361 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,548 major competitor apps |
| service | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 55,180 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 830 major competitor apps |
| food | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 35,873 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 429 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 89,249 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,834 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 55,996 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 558 major competitor apps |
| volume | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,670 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
| supply | 72 | 100 | 36 | 59 3,314 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 42 major competitor apps |
| group | 71 | 100 | 51 | 73 23,469 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 304 major competitor apps |
| contained | 70 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,442 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 7 major competitor apps |
| series | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 12,613 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 255 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 85,676 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,259 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 56,073 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 871 major competitor apps |
| applied | 71 | 100 | 36 | 58 2,789 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| following | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 28,825 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 470 major competitor apps |
App Description
There are currently 19 nozzle models available for use (10 for nozzles for fixed-wing aircraft and 9 for nozzles used for helicopters). The fixed-wing models are applicable for airspeed ranges from 100 – 160 mph while the rotary-wing models are applicable for airspeeds from 30 – 100 mph. These models have been available and widely used for a number of years as a series of downloadable spreadsheets. This app adds additional functionality through the increased mobility and a streamlined interface.
The spray nozzle models provide applicators with estimates of spray droplet size based on four input parameters that are set by the user. These include:
* Nozzle Orifice Size
* Nozzle Orientation
* Spray Pressure
* Airspeed
Using the user specified values for these parameters, the models return to following results:
* DV0.1, DV0.5, and DV0.9
o Droplet size (in µm) such that 10, 50, or 90% of the spray volume, respectively, is contained in spray droplet sizes of equal or less.
* %Vol<100µm and %Vol<200µm
o The percentage of spray volume in droplets smaller than 100 or 200 µm, respectively.
* Droplet Size Classification
o The size classification of the resulting spray based on an engineering standard (ASABE S572 (www.asabe.org).
The results, along with the initial parameters, are time and date stamped and can be saved to the user’s device and/or emailed.
This app is provided as a public servic