M&T and SLC Show 2022
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 13 keywords for M&T and SLC Show 2022 in Apple App Store
M&T and SLC Show 2022 tracks 13 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 13 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.8, difficulty 37.1.
Tracked keywords
13
0 ranked • 13 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.8
Top keyword: efficiency
Avg difficulty
37.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.9
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 14
- 68.0
industry
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 55
- 59.7
constant
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 31
- 57.9
leaders
Opportunity: 71.0 • Difficulty: 34.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 14
- 53.9
thrive
Opportunity: 71.0 • Difficulty: 32.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 16
Unranked opportunities
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.3 • Competitors: 14
industry
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.1 • Competitors: 55
constant
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 36.3 • Competitors: 31
leaders
Opportunity: 71.0 • Difficulty: 34.9 • Competitors: 14
thrive
Opportunity: 71.0 • Difficulty: 32.6 • Competitors: 16
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 146,877 • Major competitors: 1,244
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
designed
Total apps: 116,564 • Major competitors: 543
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.1
improve
Total apps: 45,912 • Major competitors: 334
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.1
industry
Total apps: 11,358 • Major competitors: 55
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 41.1
efficiency
Total apps: 6,463 • Major competitors: 14
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 38.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 116,564 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 543 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 52 | 87 146,877 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,244 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 38 | 64 6,463 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 45,912 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 334 major competitor apps |
| manufacturing | 70 | 100 | 31 | 52 1,261 competing apps Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| constant | 72 | 100 | 36 | 60 3,645 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 31 major competitor apps |
| leaders | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,836 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| industry | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 11,358 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 55 major competitor apps |
| thrive | 71 | 100 | 33 | 54 1,634 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| operational | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 3,005 competing apps Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| executives | 69 | 100 | 27 | 45 512 competing apps Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| operational efficiency | 68 | 100 | 23 | 39 202 competing apps Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| demands | 70 | 100 | 32 | 53 1,379 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |