M&T and SLC Show 2022
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 13 keywords for M&T and SLC Show 2022 in Apple App Store
M&T and SLC Show 2022 tracks 13 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 13 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 48.4, difficulty 33.3.
Tracked keywords
13
0 ranked • 13 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
48.4
Top keyword: help
Avg difficulty
33.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 85.2
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,236
- 79.9
designed
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 624
- 74.1
improve
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 379
- 45.5
efficiency
Opportunity: 57.0 • Difficulty: 29.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 12
- 48.9
constant
Opportunity: 57.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 29
Unranked opportunities
help
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236
designed
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Competitors: 624
improve
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.6 • Competitors: 379
efficiency
Opportunity: 57.0 • Difficulty: 29.6 • Competitors: 12
constant
Opportunity: 57.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 29
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
designed
Total apps: 3,407 • Major competitors: 624
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
improve
Total apps: 1,897 • Major competitors: 379
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
industry
Total apps: 230 • Major competitors: 43
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 39.1
constant
Total apps: 145 • Major competitors: 29
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 40.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| designed | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 624 major competitor apps |
| help | 59 | 100 | 61 | 85 5,873 competing apps Median installs: 257,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,236 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 57 | 100 | 30 | 46 102 competing apps Median installs: 229,538 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 12 major competitor apps |
| improve | 58 | 100 | 50 | 74 1,897 competing apps Median installs: 240,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 379 major competitor apps |
| manufacturing | 56 | 96 | 25 | 26 13 competing apps Median installs: 387,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| constant | 57 | 100 | 40 | 49 145 competing apps Median installs: 259,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 29 major competitor apps |
| leaders | 57 | 100 | 33 | 41 66 competing apps Median installs: 271,512 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 13 major competitor apps |
| industry | 57 | 100 | 39 | 53 230 competing apps Median installs: 258,150 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| thrive | 57 | 100 | 32 | 40 58 competing apps Median installs: 361,125 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| operational | 56 | 100 | 21 | 31 23 competing apps Median installs: 182,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| executives | 0 | 56 | 18 | 20 7 competing apps Median installs: 152,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| operational efficiency | 0 | 9 | 4 | 7 1 competing apps Median installs: 67,725 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| demands | 57 | 100 | 26 | 39 53 competing apps Median installs: 250,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |