M&T and SLC Show 2022
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 13 keywords for M&T and SLC Show 2022 in Apple App Store
M&T and SLC Show 2022 tracks 13 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 13 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.9, difficulty 38.5.
Tracked keywords
13
0 ranked • 13 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
69.9
Top keyword: efficiency
Avg difficulty
38.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.9
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 36
- 68.1
industry
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 111
- 59.8
constant
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 57
- 58.4
operational
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 35.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 11
- 57.7
leaders
Opportunity: 71.0 • Difficulty: 35.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 21
Unranked opportunities
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 36
industry
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.3 • Competitors: 111
constant
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 57
operational
Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 35.4 • Competitors: 11
leaders
Opportunity: 71.0 • Difficulty: 35.5 • Competitors: 21
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 150,250 • Major competitors: 2,451
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
improve
Total apps: 45,237 • Major competitors: 631
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.3
industry
Total apps: 11,665 • Major competitors: 111
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 43.3
efficiency
Total apps: 6,590 • Major competitors: 36
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 38.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 150,250 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2,451 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,590 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| improve | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 45,237 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 631 major competitor apps |
| manufacturing | 70 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,287 competing apps Median installs: 233 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| constant | 72 | 100 | 40 | 60 3,764 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 57 major competitor apps |
| leaders | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,793 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| industry | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 11,665 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 111 major competitor apps |
| thrive | 71 | 100 | 34 | 54 1,676 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 30 major competitor apps |
| operational | 72 | 100 | 35 | 58 3,105 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| executives | 69 | 100 | 28 | 45 506 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| operational efficiency | 68 | 100 | 26 | 39 204 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 3.8 | — | — | 1 major competitor apps |
| demands | 70 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,357 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |