NeRFCapture

Developer: Queensland University of

Category: Tools

Add App to Comparison

200 installs

4.00 ratings

16 monthly active users

Revenue not available

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 63 keywords for NeRFCapture in Apple App Store

Developer: Queensland University of Technology Category: tools Rating: 4.5

NeRFCapture tracks 63 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 63 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 39.1.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 63 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.4

Top keyword: source

Avg difficulty

39.1

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

source

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 110
67.7
preferred

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 171
67.5
simplify

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 96
65.2
instructions

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 87
64.4
depth

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 192
68.1

Unranked opportunities

source

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 110
preferred

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 171
simplify

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 96
instructions

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 87
depth

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 192

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 189,872 • Major competitors: 2,979

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
using

Total apps: 114,639 • Major competitors: 1,562

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
data

Total apps: 97,683 • Major competitors: 1,018

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
allows

Total apps: 80,154 • Major competitors: 662

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6
please

Total apps: 56,180 • Major competitors: 984

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
offline	69	100	49	77 41,772 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	627 major competitor apps
challenge	70	100	48	76 36,818 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	918 major competitor apps
source	73	100	43	68 11,748 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	110 major competitor apps
device	68	100	50	79 54,529 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	851 major competitor apps
images	70	100	48	74 28,277 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	316 major competitor apps
collection	70	100	47	75 32,865 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	525 major competitor apps
using	66	100	53	84 114,639 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,562 major competitor apps
time	65	100	55	88 189,872 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	2,979 major competitor apps
process	70	100	46	74 28,694 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	230 major competitor apps
directly	69	100	51	78 52,021 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	716 major competitor apps
ios	70	100	47	76 34,884 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	439 major competitor apps
tool	69	100	48	79 53,502 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	383 major competitor apps
suitable	72	100	43	69 14,776 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	186 major competitor apps
allows	67	100	50	82 80,154 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	662 major competitor apps
please	68	100	50	79 56,180 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	984 major competitor apps
difficulty	72	100	42	69 14,181 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	226 major competitor apps
equipped	72	100	38	61 4,878 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	56 major competitor apps
saved	72	100	47	69 13,828 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	193 major competitor apps
automatic	71	100	45	72 22,897 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	395 major competitor apps
detailed	69	100	48	78 52,450 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	519 major competitor apps
transfer	72	100	45	70 16,208 competing apps Median installs: 1,500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	343 major competitor apps
data	67	100	52	83 97,683 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	1,018 major competitor apps
preferred	73	100	43	67 11,447 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	171 major competitor apps
seamlessly	72	100	45	70 16,278 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	245 major competitor apps
accurately	72	100	37	62 5,089 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	46 major competitor apps

App Description

The use of Neural Radiance Fields (NeRFs) for 3D reconstruction is on the rise, but the challenge of obtaining a suitable dataset for NeRFs persists. This difficulty arises from the need for a collection of images whose positions and calibration parameters are accurately determined. NeRFCapture addresses this challenge by leveraging ARKit to establish the pose of each captured image. The resulting dataset, containing images and their respective poses and calibration parameters, can be saved offline or shared directly with your preferred NeRF implementation over the network. NeRFCapture seamlessly integrates with InstantNGP, a popular NeRF implementation, and allows for real-time data transfer using DDS with automatic peer discovery. Furthermore, NeRFCapture can also broadcast depth data if your iOS device is equipped with LiDAR. Simplify your data capture process with NeRFCapture (https://github.com/jc211/NeRFCapture), an open-source tool that encourages contributions from the community. For detailed instructions on using InstantNGP with NeRFCapture, please refer to https://github.com/NVlabs/instant-ngp/blob/master/docs/nerf_dataset_tips.md#NeRFCapture.