Myopia
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 114 keywords for Myopia in Apple App Store
Myopia tracks 114 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 114 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.5, difficulty 39.4.
Tracked keywords
114
0 ranked • 114 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.5
Top keyword: efficiency
Avg difficulty
39.4
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.7
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 38
- 62.1
patients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 35
- 64.0
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 93
- 65.8
languages
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 99
- 67.5
preferred
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 171
Unranked opportunities
efficiency
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 38
patients
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Competitors: 35
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 93
languages
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.9 • Competitors: 99
preferred
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 171
High competition keywords
information
Total apps: 121,651 • Major competitors: 1,140
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
using
Total apps: 114,552 • Major competitors: 1,550
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.1
designed
Total apps: 113,878 • Major competitors: 1,081
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
data
Total apps: 97,695 • Major competitors: 1,021
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
available
Total apps: 95,750 • Major competitors: 1,852
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| order | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 66,458 competing apps Median installs: 441 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 801 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 32,582 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 526 major competitor apps |
| language | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 29,631 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 244 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 45 | 71 19,938 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 194 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 21,735 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 143 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 121,651 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,140 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,508 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 496 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 113,878 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,081 major competitor apps |
| management | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,799 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 346 major competitor apps |
| control | 68 | 100 | 50 | 81 72,830 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 983 major competitor apps |
| choose | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 89,563 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,765 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 114,552 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,550 major competitor apps |
| available | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 95,750 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,852 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,802 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 558 major competitor apps |
| various | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 48,693 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 723 major competitor apps |
| efficiency | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,755 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| error | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,312 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 23 major competitor apps |
| patients | 73 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,406 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 35 major competitor apps |
| effective | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,925 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 145 major competitor apps |
| tests | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 7,043 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 93 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,498 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| center | 72 | 100 | 44 | 69 15,101 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 203 major competitor apps |
| apply | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 16,136 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 377 major competitor apps |
| always | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 52,475 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,016 major competitor apps |
| without | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 79,861 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,418 major competitor apps |
App Description
This is calculated using the patient’s:
1. Age;
2. Refractive error;
3. Family factor;
4. Annual gradient of progression of myopia (D/Year);
5. Myopia management option;
6. Patient's ocular length.
The estimated annual progression is calculated using data from PhD thesis of PhD MD Rodica Bilba with the theme 'TREATMENT EFFICIENCY AND PROPHYLAXIS PROGRESSION OF UNCOMPLICATED ACQUIRED MYOPIA '. The materials presented in the thesis are the result of their own research and scientific achievements and patented by the Inventor Patent at the State Agency of Intellectual Property of the Republic of Moldova number 39 on March 3, 2009.
Using the “estimated annual progression without management” as a comparison, the calculator can be used to determine the extent to which the risk of annual progression can be reduced with a specific myopia control strategy.
The study in order to identify the most effective method in the treatment and prophylaxis of myopia progression was performed during the years 2007-2013 by PhD MD Rodica Bilba at the Department of Ophthalmology of IP USMF "Nicolae Testemitanu"; the results of scientific research were implemented at the Medical Center "OculusPrim" in Chisinau, Moldova. starting with 2010.
DISCLAIMER:
For advice and treatment of myopia you should always consult an expert eye care practitioner who can carry out necessary tests and provide appropriate advice. With research on the management of myopia continuously developing, we do not guarantee that the information