EASL Guidelines
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 89 keywords for EASL Guidelines in Apple App Store
EASL Guidelines tracks 89 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 88 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.3, difficulty 41.0, best rank 30.
Tracked keywords
89
1 ranked • 88 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 30 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: healthcare
Avg difficulty
41.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.2
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 83
- 66.1
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 98
- 64.0
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 33
- 68.7
professionals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 73
- 67.2
case
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 123
Unranked opportunities
healthcare
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 83
format
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 98
patient
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 33
professionals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 73
case
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 123
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 163,515 • Major competitors: 2,635
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
best
Total apps: 117,438 • Major competitors: 2,620
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
designed
Total apps: 114,471 • Major competitors: 1,080
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.8
information
Total apps: 112,143 • Major competitors: 1,128
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
unique
Total apps: 82,074 • Major competitors: 1,892
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| guidelines | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,075 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 32 | 30 | 17 major competitor apps |
| best | 66 | 100 | 54 | 85 117,438 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,620 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 39,249 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 533 major competitor apps |
| mode | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 34,906 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 664 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 29,567 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 378 major competitor apps |
| internal | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,106 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| care | 70 | 100 | 47 | 75 29,576 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 523 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 81 67,459 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,296 major competitor apps |
| date | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 40,413 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 488 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 19,341 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 139 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 52 | 84 112,143 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,128 major competitor apps |
| designed | 66 | 100 | 52 | 85 114,471 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,080 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 55,812 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 944 major competitor apps |
| key | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 46,710 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 535 major competitor apps |
| note | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 15,010 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 260 major competitor apps |
| allied | 69 | 100 | 27 | 44 429 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| discover | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 61,210 competing apps Median installs: 578 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,369 major competitor apps |
| consulting | 70 | 100 | 30 | 50 957 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 163,515 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,635 major competitor apps |
| healthcare | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 9,068 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 83 major competitor apps |
| patients | 72 | 100 | 38 | 62 5,417 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 36 major competitor apps |
| format | 73 | 100 | 41 | 66 8,880 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 98 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 43,684 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 594 major competitor apps |
| text | 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 40,899 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 607 major competitor apps |
| tools | 69 | 100 | 48 | 76 36,694 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 596 major competitor apps |
App Description
The app includes the most up to date EASL CPGs, covering all areas of hepatology, together with the following key features:
Interactive pathway scenarios (algorithms) to aid case management
Scores and calculators
Guidelines recommendations and full text version (in PDF)
Bookmark and note function
Keyword search
Discovery tab linking to additional EASL contents of interest
Offline mode ensuring permanent access to the content wherever you are located
Download the app now and get your guidelines assistant always with you!
Disclaimer
The EASL Guidelines app is designed for professional use delivering instant medical information and clinical recommendations to medical experts (i.e. hepatologists, gastroenterologists and internal medicine specialists) that may aid them in delivering patient care. Patients and other members of the community who use this app should only do so after consulting with a healthcare professional, and they should not consider these guidelines as a substitute for professional medical advice.
Guidelines and recommendations included in this app may not be universally applicable and should be understood within the context of particular clinical scenarios and resource constraints. It is the responsibility of each health care professional to tailor these guidelines according to local regulations and the unique circumstances and requirements of each patient.