Clinflash eTMF

Developer: Jiaxing Clinflash Computer

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

50 installs

1.00 ratings

19 monthly active users

Revenue not available

Install Trends

Weekly +8.00

Trending

Monthly +50

Trending

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 22 keywords for Clinflash eTMF in Apple App Store

Developer: Jiaxing Clinflash Computer Technology Co. Ltd Category: medical Rating: 2

Clinflash eTMF tracks 22 keywords (2 keywords rank; 20 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.5, difficulty 42.5, best rank 17.

Tracked keywords

2 ranked • 20 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

Best rank 17 • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.5

Top keyword: document

Avg difficulty

42.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

document

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 132
67.1
low

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 245
68.2
electronic

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 73
64.7
trial period

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank 19

Competitors: 225
62.9
traditional

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 220
70.3

Unranked opportunities

document

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 132
low

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.1 • Competitors: 245
electronic

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 73
traditional

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 220
efficient

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 114

High competition keywords

create

Total apps: 119,326 • Major competitors: 2,292

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.7
daily

Total apps: 75,222 • Major competitors: 1,463

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.6
high

Total apps: 47,088 • Major competitors: 792

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 49.0
professional

Total apps: 43,504 • Major competitors: 513

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.4
management

Total apps: 42,405 • Major competitors: 336

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
trial period	72	100	40	63 5,723 competing apps Median installs: 1,500 Avg rating: 4.3	19	17	225 major competitor apps
trial	71	100	47	73 23,875 competing apps Median installs: 1,552 Avg rating: 4.3	159	159	788 major competitor apps
management	69	100	47	77 42,405 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	336 major competitor apps
traditional	72	100	44	70 15,869 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	220 major competitor apps
process	70	100	45	74 25,749 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	226 major competitor apps
update	71	100	46	72 20,586 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	358 major competitor apps
document	73	100	42	67 10,285 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	132 major competitor apps
efficient	72	100	44	71 16,876 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	114 major competitor apps
enterprise	72	100	36	59 3,291 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	17 major competitor apps
create	66	100	55	85 119,326 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,292 major competitor apps
low	73	100	43	68 11,835 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	245 major competitor apps
professional	69	100	48	78 43,504 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	513 major competitor apps
main	71	100	44	72 20,562 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	222 major competitor apps
daily	67	100	53	82 75,222 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	1,463 major competitor apps
system	69	100	47	77 41,100 competing apps Median installs: 398 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	407 major competitor apps
high	69	100	49	78 47,088 competing apps Median installs: 592 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	792 major competitor apps
pain	71	100	36	56 2,309 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	25 major competitor apps
electronic	73	100	41	65 7,343 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	73 major competitor apps
clinical	72	100	38	63 5,443 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	26 major competitor apps
management system	71	100	34	57 2,561 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 3.9	—	—	6 major competitor apps
poor	71	100	34	54 1,766 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	26 major competitor apps
clinical trial	67	100	22	37 156 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	0 major competitor apps

App Description

Clinflash eTMF App is a full process management system that supports the scanning, approval, archiving, and update of clinical trial documents, as well as the daily management of enterprise SOP documents. It effectively solves the four pain points of traditional clinical document management: low efficiency, high cost, high risk, and poor quality, and helps enterprises create an efficient and professional electronic trial main files management system.