Spanish SFST
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 106 keywords for Spanish SFST in Apple App Store
Spanish SFST tracks 106 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 105 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.7, difficulty 38.0, best rank 124.
Tracked keywords
106
1 ranked • 105 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 124 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: navigation
Avg difficulty
38.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.2
navigation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 122
- 65.1
individuals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 61
- 64.0
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 94
- 67.3
case
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 125
- 67.7
address
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 159
Unranked opportunities
navigation
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 122
individuals
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 61
tests
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 94
case
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.7 • Competitors: 125
address
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 159
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 162,218 • Major competitors: 2,474
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
features
Total apps: 126,019 • Major competitors: 2,127
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
every
Total apps: 120,114 • Major competitors: 2,505
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.7
play
Total apps: 95,976 • Major competitors: 2,460
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
easily
Total apps: 85,355 • Major competitors: 1,274
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| conduct | 72 | 100 | 35 | 58 3,108 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | 152 | 124 | 21 major competitor apps |
| play | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 95,976 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,460 major competitor apps |
| navigation | 73 | 100 | 44 | 68 12,619 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 122 major competitor apps |
| step | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 42,112 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 644 major competitor apps |
| audio | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 34,850 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 408 major competitor apps |
| language | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 29,613 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 243 major competitor apps |
| section | 72 | 100 | 42 | 69 14,183 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 20,653 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 208 major competitor apps |
| used | 69 | 100 | 49 | 78 50,553 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 504 major competitor apps |
| built | 71 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,992 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 258 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 49 | 80 62,145 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 542 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 162,218 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,474 major competitor apps |
| including | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 67,637 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,399 major competitor apps |
| individuals | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 8,271 competing apps Median installs: 300 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 61 major competitor apps |
| test | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 42,093 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 714 major competitor apps |
| test results | 70 | 100 | 29 | 47 703 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| effective | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,932 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 146 major competitor apps |
| tests | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 7,050 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 94 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 27,851 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 327 major competitor apps |
| tools | 70 | 100 | 47 | 76 36,550 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 597 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 48 | 79 53,488 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 384 major competitor apps |
| easily | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 85,355 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,274 major competitor apps |
| diverse | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 18,471 competing apps Median installs: 501 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 328 major competitor apps |
| ensures | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,611 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 179 major competitor apps |
| case | 73 | 100 | 42 | 67 11,128 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 125 major competitor apps |
App Description
Officers can easily play spoken instructions aloud in Spanish, providing clarity for individuals being tested while maintaining accuracy in the process. With streamlined navigation and step-by-step guidance, Spanish SFST covers every component of the field sobriety tests.
Key features include:
- Audio prompts for each instruction
- Spanish Miranda warning
FAQ section to address common questions
Whether used during roadside assessments or in training, Spanish SFST empowers officers with the tools they need to conduct sobriety testing with confidence, efficiency, and fairness.
Case law supporting the usage of this app:
Wisconsin v Alejandro Herrera Ayala:
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals addressed the admissibility of SFSTs administered in Spanish. The court found that the SFSTs were administered properly according to NHTSA guidelines. It was established that Ayala understood the instructions given in Spanish, and there was no evidence suggesting that the language of administration had compromised the reliability of the tests. Therefore, the court upheld the admissibility of the SFST results, highlighting that proper procedural compliance and the suspect’s comprehension were the key factors, not the specific language used.
United States v. Horn:
This case highlights the importance of administering SFSTs in strict accordance with NHTSA standards, focusing on the scientific reliability and proper execution of the tests rather than the language used. It serves as an example where adherence to standardized procedures can validate test results in any language, including Spanish.
Rodriguez v. Texas (2013):
This case involved the admissibility of SFSTs, emphasizing that the proper administration of the tests according to established protocols is crucial. The language of administration, including Spanish, does not impact the admissibility as long as the tests are conducted correctly.