CIQOL

Developer: The Medical University

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 125 keywords for CIQOL in Apple App Store

Developer: The Medical University of South Carolina Category: medical

CIQOL tracks 125 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 125 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 39.0.

Tracked keywords

125

0 ranked • 125 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.0

Top keyword: healthcare

Avg difficulty

39.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

healthcare

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 36
66.1
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 14
64.0
benefit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 48
65.5
manual

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 44
67.3
monitoring

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 49
66.9

Unranked opportunities

healthcare

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 36
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.4 • Competitors: 14
benefit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 48
manual

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.5 • Competitors: 44
monitoring

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 49

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 193,693 • Major competitors: 1,544

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
access

Total apps: 159,395 • Major competitors: 1,337

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8
help

Total apps: 146,877 • Major competitors: 1,244

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
mobile

Total apps: 117,282 • Major competitors: 771

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3
using

Total apps: 116,658 • Major competitors: 765

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.3

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
change	69	100	46	77 38,106 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	402 major competitor apps
whether	67	100	50	83 91,896 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	595 major competitor apps
care	70	100	45	75 28,820 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	254 major competitor apps
digital	69	100	47	78 45,148 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	332 major competitor apps
design	70	100	46	76 35,473 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	353 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	51	85 116,564 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	543 major competitor apps
profile	72	100	43	71 17,159 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	145 major competitor apps
way	66	100	51	84 104,750 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,047 major competitor apps
using	66	100	51	85 116,658 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	765 major competitor apps
built	70	100	45	75 28,263 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	142 major competitor apps
life	68	100	48	80 57,128 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	502 major competitor apps
time	65	100	54	89 193,693 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,544 major competitor apps
mobile	66	100	51	85 117,282 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	771 major competitor apps
key	69	100	47	77 41,571 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	268 major competitor apps
help	65	100	52	87 146,877 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,244 major competitor apps
intuitive	69	100	47	79 49,448 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	281 major competitor apps
process	70	100	44	74 25,308 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	108 major competitor apps
including	68	100	49	81 69,233 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	744 major competitor apps
understanding	72	100	42	69 13,861 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	40 major competitor apps
access	65	100	53	87 159,395 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,337 major competitor apps
healthcare	73	100	40	66 8,742 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	36 major competitor apps
monitor	70	100	45	75 28,254 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	169 major competitor apps
patients	72	100	38	63 5,457 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	19 major competitor apps
efficient	72	100	43	71 16,502 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	46 major competitor apps
track	66	100	51	84 104,746 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	791 major competitor apps

App Description

The Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Digital Platform is a revolutionary tool designed to improve the care and outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) users. This innovative platform consists of two main components: the CIQOL App for patients and the CIQOL Clinical Web Portal for healthcare professionals. Built on a foundation of comprehensive research and developed using a User-Centered Design approach, this platform empowers both patients and clinicians by offering a streamlined, efficient way to monitor CI-related outcomes.

The CIQOL Digital Platform is the result of years of research focused on understanding and improving the cochlear implant experience. It provides patients with easy-to-complete assessments before and after surgery, while clinicians benefit from automated scoring, data comparisons, and interpretation that can help guide clinical care.

Key Features:

1. Pre-Cochlear Implant Evaluation: Patients complete key components of the evaluation process before arriving at the clinic, saving time and enhancing the assessment process.
These include:

- Patient intake section, gathering demographics and hearing history.

- CIQOL outcome expectations assessment with automated scoring, compared to data from over 700 experienced CI users.

- Baseline pre-CI CIQOL-35 Profile assessment with automated scoring and comparison to normative CIQOL data.

2. Post-Cochlear Implant Monitoring: The platform enables ongoing, automated monitoring at 1, 3, 6, and 12-month intervals post-surgery. Patients complete the CIQOL-35 Profile at
these intervals, and results are:

- Automatically compared to baseline scores.

- Analyzed to determine whether improvements exceed the minimal detectable change threshold.

- Linked to speech recognition scores for a holistic view of patient progress.

3. Automated Scoring and Interpretation: The platform eliminates manual calculations by automatically generating scores for both pre- and post-implant assessments. Clinicians
receive detailed insights, including comparisons to normative data and interpretation of patient progress over time.

4. User-Friendly Interface: Patients and clinicians access the platform through either a mobile app or web-based portal. The intuitive design allows patients to track their progress
and engage in thei