CIQOL

Developer: The Medical University

Category: Medical

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 124 keywords for CIQOL in Apple App Store

Developer: The Medical University of South Carolina Category: medical

CIQOL tracks 124 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 124 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 49.6, difficulty 38.5.

Tracked keywords

124

0 ranked • 124 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

49.6

Top keyword: way

Avg difficulty

38.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

way

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,067
83.0
time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,805
88.7
help

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,236
85.2
access

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,388
85.7
change

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 400
73.9

Unranked opportunities

way

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Competitors: 1,067
time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
help

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 61.1 • Competitors: 1,236
access

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,388
change

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Competitors: 400

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
access

Total apps: 6,181 • Major competitors: 1,388

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
help

Total apps: 5,873 • Major competitors: 1,236

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.1
way

Total apps: 4,665 • Major competitors: 1,067

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.3
using

Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
change	58	100	54	74 1,855 competing apps Median installs: 267,450 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	400 major competitor apps
whether	58	100	59	79 3,139 competing apps Median installs: 267,650 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	715 major competitor apps
care	58	100	49	70 1,236 competing apps Median installs: 259,912 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	262 major competitor apps
digital	58	100	52	72 1,579 competing apps Median installs: 256,800 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	339 major competitor apps
design	58	100	50	73 1,669 competing apps Median installs: 243,225 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	335 major competitor apps
designed	58	100	54	80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	624 major competitor apps
profile	58	100	59	63 624 competing apps Median installs: 303,488 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	154 major competitor apps
way	59	100	60	83 4,665 competing apps Median installs: 271,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,067 major competitor apps
using	58	100	61	83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	924 major competitor apps
built	58	100	46	66 855 competing apps Median installs: 239,450 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	175 major competitor apps
life	58	100	54	77 2,518 competing apps Median installs: 234,138 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	503 major competitor apps
time	59	100	63	89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,805 major competitor apps
mobile	58	100	60	81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	846 major competitor apps
key	58	100	51	69 1,089 competing apps Median installs: 257,575 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	226 major competitor apps
help	59	100	61	85 5,873 competing apps Median installs: 257,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,236 major competitor apps
intuitive	58	100	48	72 1,513 competing apps Median installs: 238,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	270 major competitor apps
process	58	100	45	63 624 competing apps Median installs: 224,238 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	122 major competitor apps
including	58	100	62	81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	926 major competitor apps
understanding	57	100	37	55 266 competing apps Median installs: 199,150 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	39 major competitor apps
access	59	100	63	86 6,181 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,388 major competitor apps
healthcare	57	100	39	52 203 competing apps Median installs: 233,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	36 major competitor apps
monitor	58	100	49	66 847 competing apps Median installs: 244,700 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	175 major competitor apps
patients	57	100	30	45 99 competing apps Median installs: 221,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	21 major competitor apps
efficient	57	100	41	57 326 competing apps Median installs: 207,525 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	44 major competitor apps
track	58	100	60	80 3,456 competing apps Median installs: 263,688 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	822 major competitor apps

App Description

The Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Digital Platform is a revolutionary tool designed to improve the care and outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) users. This innovative platform consists of two main components: the CIQOL App for patients and the CIQOL Clinical Web Portal for healthcare professionals. Built on a foundation of comprehensive research and developed using a User-Centered Design approach, this platform empowers both patients and clinicians by offering a streamlined, efficient way to monitor CI-related outcomes.

The CIQOL Digital Platform is the result of years of research focused on understanding and improving the cochlear implant experience. It provides patients with easy-to-complete assessments before and after surgery, while clinicians benefit from automated scoring, data comparisons, and interpretation that can help guide clinical care.

Key Features:

1. Pre-Cochlear Implant Evaluation: Patients complete key components of the evaluation process before arriving at the clinic, saving time and enhancing the assessment process.
These include:

- Patient intake section, gathering demographics and hearing history.

- CIQOL outcome expectations assessment with automated scoring, compared to data from over 700 experienced CI users.

- Baseline pre-CI CIQOL-35 Profile assessment with automated scoring and comparison to normative CIQOL data.

2. Post-Cochlear Implant Monitoring: The platform enables ongoing, automated monitoring at 1, 3, 6, and 12-month intervals post-surgery. Patients complete the CIQOL-35 Profile at
these intervals, and results are:

- Automatically compared to baseline scores.

- Analyzed to determine whether improvements exceed the minimal detectable change threshold.

- Linked to speech recognition scores for a holistic view of patient progress.

3. Automated Scoring and Interpretation: The platform eliminates manual calculations by automatically generating scores for both pre- and post-implant assessments. Clinicians
receive detailed insights, including comparisons to normative data and interpretation of patient progress over time.

4. User-Friendly Interface: Patients and clinicians access the platform through either a mobile app or web-based portal. The intuitive design allows patients to track their progress
and engage in thei