CIQOL

Developer: The Medical University

Category: Medical

Add App to Comparison

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 125 keywords for CIQOL in Apple App Store

Developer: The Medical University of South Carolina Category: medical

CIQOL tracks 125 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 125 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 39.5.

Tracked keywords

125

0 ranked • 125 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.0

Top keyword: healthcare

Avg difficulty

39.5

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

healthcare

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 73
66.2
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 31
64.0
benefit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 99
65.5
manual

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 96
67.6
monitoring

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 81
67.0

Unranked opportunities

healthcare

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 73
patient

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 31
benefit

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 99
manual

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 96
monitoring

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 81

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 190,810 • Major competitors: 2,547

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.4
access

Total apps: 163,522 • Major competitors: 2,308

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
help

Total apps: 150,247 • Major competitors: 2,104

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
mobile

Total apps: 120,208 • Major competitors: 1,383

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
using

Total apps: 115,200 • Major competitors: 1,312

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
change	69	100	47	77 38,598 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	665 major competitor apps
whether	67	100	51	83 89,869 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	959 major competitor apps
care	70	100	46	75 29,574 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	463 major competitor apps
digital	69	100	48	78 46,512 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	587 major competitor apps
design	69	100	47	76 36,637 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	585 major competitor apps
designed	66	100	51	85 114,538 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	925 major competitor apps
profile	72	100	45	71 17,817 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	249 major competitor apps
way	66	100	52	84 107,104 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,719 major competitor apps
using	66	100	52	85 115,200 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,312 major competitor apps
built	70	100	45	74 27,191 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	231 major competitor apps
life	68	100	50	80 58,671 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	821 major competitor apps
time	65	100	54	88 190,810 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,547 major competitor apps
mobile	66	100	52	85 120,208 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,383 major competitor apps
key	69	100	48	78 46,678 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	454 major competitor apps
help	65	100	54	87 150,247 competing apps Median installs: 200 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	2,104 major competitor apps
intuitive	68	100	48	79 51,124 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	508 major competitor apps
process	70	100	45	74 25,750 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	188 major competitor apps
including	68	100	51	81 68,035 competing apps Median installs: 250 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,242 major competitor apps
understanding	72	100	42	69 14,216 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	73 major competitor apps
access	65	100	54	87 163,522 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	2,308 major competitor apps
healthcare	73	100	40	66 9,069 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	73 major competitor apps
monitor	70	100	46	75 29,340 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	323 major competitor apps
patients	72	100	38	62 5,417 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	30 major competitor apps
efficient	72	100	43	71 16,873 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	86 major competitor apps
track	66	100	52	84 109,351 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	1,347 major competitor apps

App Description

The Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Digital Platform is a revolutionary tool designed to improve the care and outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) users. This innovative platform consists of two main components: the CIQOL App for patients and the CIQOL Clinical Web Portal for healthcare professionals. Built on a foundation of comprehensive research and developed using a User-Centered Design approach, this platform empowers both patients and clinicians by offering a streamlined, efficient way to monitor CI-related outcomes.

The CIQOL Digital Platform is the result of years of research focused on understanding and improving the cochlear implant experience. It provides patients with easy-to-complete assessments before and after surgery, while clinicians benefit from automated scoring, data comparisons, and interpretation that can help guide clinical care.

Key Features:

1. Pre-Cochlear Implant Evaluation: Patients complete key components of the evaluation process before arriving at the clinic, saving time and enhancing the assessment process.
These include:

- Patient intake section, gathering demographics and hearing history.

- CIQOL outcome expectations assessment with automated scoring, compared to data from over 700 experienced CI users.

- Baseline pre-CI CIQOL-35 Profile assessment with automated scoring and comparison to normative CIQOL data.

2. Post-Cochlear Implant Monitoring: The platform enables ongoing, automated monitoring at 1, 3, 6, and 12-month intervals post-surgery. Patients complete the CIQOL-35 Profile at
these intervals, and results are:

- Automatically compared to baseline scores.

- Analyzed to determine whether improvements exceed the minimal detectable change threshold.

- Linked to speech recognition scores for a holistic view of patient progress.

3. Automated Scoring and Interpretation: The platform eliminates manual calculations by automatically generating scores for both pre- and post-implant assessments. Clinicians
receive detailed insights, including comparisons to normative data and interpretation of patient progress over time.

4. User-Friendly Interface: Patients and clinicians access the platform through either a mobile app or web-based portal. The intuitive design allows patients to track their progress
and engage in thei