Icarus for ACCA
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 103 keywords for Icarus for ACCA in Apple App Store
Icarus for ACCA tracks 103 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 103 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 54.0, difficulty 43.0.
Tracked keywords
103
0 ranked • 103 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
54.0
Top keyword: new
Avg difficulty
43.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 91.1
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 2,341
- 85.7
access
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,388
- 59.5
simulation
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 84
- 75.5
challenge
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 496
- 64.1
social media
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 133
Unranked opportunities
new
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.9 • Competitors: 2,341
access
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,388
simulation
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 84
challenge
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.2 • Competitors: 496
social media
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.8 • Competitors: 133
High competition keywords
new
Total apps: 10,701 • Major competitors: 2,341
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.9
access
Total apps: 6,181 • Major competitors: 1,388
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
using
Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
different
Total apps: 4,440 • Major competitors: 823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
including
Total apps: 3,880 • Major competitors: 926
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| new | 59 | 100 | 64 | 91 10,701 competing apps Median installs: 270,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 2,341 major competitor apps |
| simulation | 58 | 100 | 40 | 60 427 competing apps Median installs: 281,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
| challenge | 58 | 100 | 51 | 75 2,171 competing apps Median installs: 283,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 496 major competitor apps |
| competitive | 20 | 100 | 46 | 59 393 competing apps Median installs: 289,300 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 107 major competitor apps |
| social media | 58 | 100 | 46 | 64 685 competing apps Median installs: 238,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| changes | 58 | 100 | 49 | 62 553 competing apps Median installs: 258,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| environment | 57 | 100 | 38 | 59 397 competing apps Median installs: 218,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 63 major competitor apps |
| external | 57 | 100 | 40 | 55 257 competing apps Median installs: 213,300 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| individual | 58 | 100 | 45 | 61 489 competing apps Median installs: 247,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| team | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,972 competing apps Median installs: 284,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 445 major competitor apps |
| working | 58 | 100 | 52 | 63 629 competing apps Median installs: 245,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 119 major competitor apps |
| using | 58 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 924 major competitor apps |
| life | 58 | 100 | 54 | 77 2,518 competing apps Median installs: 234,138 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 503 major competitor apps |
| provide | 58 | 100 | 49 | 73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 293 major competitor apps |
| company | 58 | 100 | 41 | 61 480 competing apps Median installs: 216,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 68 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| username | 57 | 100 | 38 | 48 132 competing apps Median installs: 279,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| directly | 58 | 100 | 58 | 74 1,959 competing apps Median installs: 280,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 424 major competitor apps |
| explore | 58 | 100 | 61 | 79 3,030 competing apps Median installs: 275,988 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 711 major competitor apps |
| small | 58 | 100 | 51 | 66 862 competing apps Median installs: 228,538 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 155 major competitor apps |
| access | 59 | 100 | 63 | 86 6,181 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,388 major competitor apps |
| test | 58 | 100 | 50 | 73 1,727 competing apps Median installs: 258,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 389 major competitor apps |
| student | 57 | 100 | 35 | 50 160 competing apps Median installs: 249,638 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 28 major competitor apps |
| students | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 253 competing apps Median installs: 213,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| financial | 58 | 100 | 54 | 65 763 competing apps Median installs: 247,975 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 162 major competitor apps |
App Description
This business simulation provides students working in small teams with a complex business challenge set in a real-life context, where research into the market and the industry will be directly relevant to and consistent with the simulated business.
Teams use the model to explore different strategies, and carry out what-if analysis and scenario planning to test the robustness of their plans.
The simulation includes the following stages:
1. Research and analysis. Students have access to past financial results of the simulation company and will be expected to research the real economic and competitive environment of the industry.
2. Teamworking. The simulation includes built-in social media tools to enable students in different locations to communicate and work as teams in managing their airports. A nominated Chief Executive is responsible for co-ordinating plans and submitting the agreed decisions each period. Teams are able to rotate the CEO and other roles.
3. Planning. Using the simulation, the students are able to build a five-year business plan, including exploring and comparing different strategies and testing the robustness of their plans in different external scenarios.
4. Implementation. Team decisions are processed through the “real world” model and teams will be able to compare their actual results against their plans and budgets and also benchmark their progress against other student teams. They also receive feedback about the market and data about changes in the competitive environment.
5. Reflection and further decision making. Teams can adapt their plans, review their decisions and respond to new stimulae before submitting subsequent sets of decisions.
6. Final report. Students may provide individual and/or team reports for tutors to provide feedback on.