Tea app:MealSpotFinder
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 61 keywords for Tea app:MealSpotFinder in Apple App Store
Tea app:MealSpotFinder tracks 61 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 61 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 54.3, difficulty 42.1.
Tracked keywords
61
0 ranked • 61 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
54.3
Top keyword: choose
Avg difficulty
42.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 83.5
choose
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,081
- 87.6
like
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,767
- 68.2
travel
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 236
- 67.7
food
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 226
- 62.3
ideal
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 100
Unranked opportunities
choose
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.7 • Competitors: 1,081
like
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,767
travel
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.5 • Competitors: 236
food
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.1 • Competitors: 226
ideal
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 100
High competition keywords
like
Total apps: 7,508 • Major competitors: 1,767
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
choose
Total apps: 4,918 • Major competitors: 1,081
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.7
want
Total apps: 4,034 • Major competitors: 840
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
add
Total apps: 3,653 • Major competitors: 806
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.7
track
Total apps: 3,456 • Major competitors: 822
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| travel | 58 | 100 | 55 | 68 1,034 competing apps Median installs: 263,950 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 236 major competitor apps |
| choose | 59 | 100 | 61 | 83 4,918 competing apps Median installs: 263,588 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,081 major competitor apps |
| food | 58 | 100 | 52 | 68 985 competing apps Median installs: 270,500 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| taste | 20 | 100 | 39 | 51 175 competing apps Median installs: 281,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 46 major competitor apps |
| ideal | 58 | 100 | 42 | 62 567 competing apps Median installs: 214,500 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 100 major competitor apps |
| small | 58 | 100 | 51 | 66 862 competing apps Median installs: 228,538 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 155 major competitor apps |
| interface | 58 | 100 | 44 | 66 871 competing apps Median installs: 226,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 136 major competitor apps |
| track | 58 | 100 | 60 | 80 3,456 competing apps Median installs: 263,688 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 822 major competitor apps |
| good | 58 | 100 | 52 | 71 1,413 competing apps Median installs: 276,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 294 major competitor apps |
| simple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,416 competing apps Median installs: 254,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| type | 58 | 100 | 46 | 65 765 competing apps Median installs: 272,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 166 major competitor apps |
| want | 58 | 100 | 58 | 82 4,034 competing apps Median installs: 255,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 840 major competitor apps |
| like | 59 | 100 | 63 | 88 7,508 competing apps Median installs: 276,638 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,767 major competitor apps |
| feature | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,597 competing apps Median installs: 260,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 352 major competitor apps |
| soft | 57 | 100 | 31 | 47 114 competing apps Median installs: 174,938 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 16 major competitor apps |
| clear | 58 | 100 | 47 | 70 1,216 competing apps Median installs: 241,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 231 major competitor apps |
| quick | 58 | 100 | 55 | 75 2,043 competing apps Median installs: 261,450 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 459 major competitor apps |
| includes | 58 | 100 | 49 | 70 1,252 competing apps Median installs: 237,900 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 246 major competitor apps |
| cards | 58 | 100 | 58 | 71 1,319 competing apps Median installs: 299,650 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 322 major competitor apps |
| feel | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,977 competing apps Median installs: 271,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 424 major competitor apps |
| meal | 20 | 100 | 49 | 56 298 competing apps Median installs: 331,862 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 79 major competitor apps |
| affordable | 57 | 100 | 47 | 53 229 competing apps Median installs: 326,950 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 56 major competitor apps |
| tiny | 57 | 100 | 38 | 52 189 competing apps Median installs: 255,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| sorting | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 255 competing apps Median installs: 238,400 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 45 major competitor apps |
| select | 58 | 100 | 60 | 74 1,798 competing apps Median installs: 287,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 438 major competitor apps |
App Description
To record a meal spot, choose type (café, bakery, diner, street food, restaurant), select detail category (price, comfort, crowd, service, seating), describe what you noticed, and add a situational tag such as “passing by,” “visited,” or “want to try.” Entries appear as neat food-spot tiles. The overview includes sorting by spot type and quick statistics for your preferences. The Taste Trail feature lines up today’s meal findings into a clear trail that reflects your food exploration.