CeDAR - Ventral Hernia
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 105 keywords for CeDAR - Ventral Hernia in Apple App Store
CeDAR - Ventral Hernia tracks 105 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 105 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 51.7, difficulty 40.3.
Tracked keywords
105
0 ranked • 105 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
51.7
Top keyword: time
Avg difficulty
40.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 88.7
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,805
- 83.2
world
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,016
- 70.9
health
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 307
- 73.9
change
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 400
- 74.6
users
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 430
Unranked opportunities
time
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
world
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.7 • Competitors: 1,016
health
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.3 • Competitors: 307
change
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.7 • Competitors: 400
users
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Competitors: 430
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
world
Total apps: 4,763 • Major competitors: 1,016
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.7
mobile
Total apps: 3,947 • Major competitors: 846
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.2
including
Total apps: 3,880 • Major competitors: 926
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.0
many
Total apps: 3,804 • Major competitors: 758
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| health | 58 | 100 | 51 | 71 1,361 competing apps Median installs: 248,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 307 major competitor apps |
| change | 58 | 100 | 54 | 74 1,855 competing apps Median installs: 267,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 400 major competitor apps |
| reason | 20 | 100 | 35 | 44 86 competing apps Median installs: 220,525 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| individual | 58 | 100 | 45 | 61 489 competing apps Median installs: 247,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 101 major competitor apps |
| simply | 58 | 100 | 52 | 73 1,724 competing apps Median installs: 235,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 356 major competitor apps |
| used | 58 | 100 | 53 | 72 1,494 competing apps Median installs: 237,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 279 major competitor apps |
| educational | 58 | 100 | 42 | 62 571 competing apps Median installs: 207,750 Avg rating: 4.5 | — | — | 96 major competitor apps |
| money | 58 | 100 | 56 | 75 2,017 competing apps Median installs: 270,575 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 443 major competitor apps |
| time | 59 | 100 | 63 | 89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,805 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| added | 58 | 100 | 49 | 69 1,150 competing apps Median installs: 269,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 248 major competitor apps |
| including | 58 | 100 | 62 | 81 3,880 competing apps Median installs: 285,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 926 major competitor apps |
| among | 58 | 100 | 46 | 62 533 competing apps Median installs: 247,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 116 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 57 | 100 | 37 | 55 266 competing apps Median installs: 199,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 39 major competitor apps |
| patients | 57 | 100 | 30 | 45 99 competing apps Median installs: 221,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 21 major competitor apps |
| accurate | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 792 competing apps Median installs: 240,225 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 140 major competitor apps |
| around | 58 | 100 | 60 | 78 2,784 competing apps Median installs: 275,088 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 645 major competitor apps |
| financial | 58 | 100 | 54 | 65 763 competing apps Median installs: 247,975 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 162 major competitor apps |
| related | 58 | 100 | 50 | 62 555 competing apps Median installs: 238,975 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| many | 58 | 100 | 55 | 81 3,804 competing apps Median installs: 252,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 758 major competitor apps |
| provides | 58 | 100 | 49 | 74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 308 major competitor apps |
| quality | 58 | 100 | 53 | 74 1,906 competing apps Median installs: 248,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| tool | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| good | 58 | 100 | 52 | 71 1,413 competing apps Median installs: 276,475 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 294 major competitor apps |
App Description
We believe assessing and understanding a patient's preoperative health status can significantly impact postoperative outcomes. The Carolinas Equation for Determining Associated Risks (CeDAR) predicts the risks and financial impact of wound-related problems following ventral hernia repair. The complex mathematical equation, which was calculated from data taken from patients around the world after their surgery, has been independently tested and found to be accurate and reliable. With the aid of mobile app technology, CeDAR now provides surgeons and patients with a powerful tool that can predict individualized wound outcomes after abdominal hernia surgery. Moreover, it offers patients detailed educational materials about many types of hernias and their treatments. Users simply answer eight questions about themselves, including height and weight. Based on these answers, a percentage chance of developing specific postoperative complications requiring treatment is calculated along with the corresponding cost of this treatment. These results can then be used to discuss an individual patient's risk for wound problems after surgery and what they can change to improve their odds for a good result.