Ravenous by EdGE
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 88 keywords for Ravenous by EdGE in Apple App Store
Ravenous by EdGE tracks 88 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 87 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.4, difficulty 40.6, best rank 63.
Tracked keywords
88
1 ranked • 87 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 63 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: survive
Avg difficulty
40.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 62.5
survive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 116
- 66.8
gaming
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 330
- 68.7
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 176
- 64.6
black
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 135
- 63.4
flight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 133
Unranked opportunities
survive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.9 • Competitors: 116
gaming
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 330
energy
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 176
black
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 135
flight
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 133
High competition keywords
free
Total apps: 176,038 • Major competitors: 3,927
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
like
Total apps: 153,376 • Major competitors: 3,281
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4
find
Total apps: 149,918 • Major competitors: 2,800
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.1
real
Total apps: 105,349 • Major competitors: 1,810
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
play
Total apps: 95,995 • Major competitors: 2,460
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| edge | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 17,718 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | 99 | 63 | 201 major competitor apps |
| free | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 176,038 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,927 major competitor apps |
| play | 67 | 100 | 52 | 83 95,995 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,460 major competitor apps |
| fun | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 91,337 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,115 major competitor apps |
| challenging | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 27,328 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 729 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 51 | 82 83,388 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,123 major competitor apps |
| educational | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 24,488 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 209 major competitor apps |
| people | 68 | 100 | 52 | 79 56,356 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 920 major competitor apps |
| choose | 67 | 100 | 53 | 82 89,576 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,765 major competitor apps |
| find | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 149,918 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,800 major competitor apps |
| food | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 40,236 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 58,942 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 604 major competitor apps |
| special | 69 | 100 | 50 | 78 48,128 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,058 major competitor apps |
| group | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 25,649 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 311 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 15,787 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 91 major competitor apps |
| survive | 73 | 100 | 40 | 63 5,747 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 116 major competitor apps |
| related | 71 | 100 | 46 | 72 22,222 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 230 major competitor apps |
| part | 70 | 100 | 48 | 74 29,289 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 405 major competitor apps |
| real | 67 | 100 | 54 | 84 105,349 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,810 major competitor apps |
| like | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 153,376 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,281 major competitor apps |
| players | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 28,373 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 840 major competitor apps |
| see | 67 | 100 | 54 | 83 92,622 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,751 major competitor apps |
| influence | 71 | 100 | 35 | 57 2,569 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| made | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 36,159 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 576 major competitor apps |
| possible | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 21,920 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
App Description
Ravenous puts players in the role of a raven interacting with the living and non-living challenges of its environment. Flying longer and longer distances reflects an intuitive understanding of adaptations related to the aerodynamics and energy cost of bird flight as well as behavioral strategies that influence survival. Ravenous is part of the Leveling Up collection, developed by EdGE to support and measure science learning in games people choose to play in their free time.
EdGE — On the edge of science and play! The Educational Gaming Environments group (EdGE) at TERC hopes to show that learning happens in all kinds of places by investigating the possibilities—and challenging the assumptions—of game-based learning environments. EdGE is designing and studying games whose mechanics mirror real scientific phenomena, but more importantly, are fun to play.
EdGE at TERC Copyright 2013.
Work made possible by funding from the National Science Foundation (DRK12 grant #1119144). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect views of the National Science Foundation.