SPQR-ND
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 99 keywords for SPQR-ND in Apple App Store
SPQR-ND tracks 99 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 99 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 50.1, difficulty 37.8.
Tracked keywords
99
0 ranked • 99 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
50.1
Top keyword: way
Avg difficulty
37.8
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 83.0
way
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,067
- 85.7
access
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,388
- 84.7
create
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,155
- 83.2
unique
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,009
- 61.2
maps
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 120
Unranked opportunities
way
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Competitors: 1,067
access
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,388
create
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.6 • Competitors: 1,155
unique
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 57.5 • Competitors: 1,009
maps
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 49.0 • Competitors: 120
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 6,181 • Major competitors: 1,388
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
create
Total apps: 5,537 • Major competitors: 1,155
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.6
unique
Total apps: 4,782 • Major competitors: 1,009
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
way
Total apps: 4,665 • Major competitors: 1,067
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.3
different
Total apps: 4,440 • Major competitors: 823
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| maps | 58 | 100 | 49 | 61 507 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 120 major competitor apps |
| users | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 430 major competitor apps |
| within | 58 | 100 | 56 | 81 3,722 competing apps Median installs: 259,688 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 740 major competitor apps |
| digital | 58 | 100 | 52 | 72 1,579 competing apps Median installs: 256,800 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 339 major competitor apps |
| information | 58 | 100 | 57 | 78 2,704 competing apps Median installs: 252,888 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 572 major competitor apps |
| team | 58 | 100 | 52 | 75 1,972 competing apps Median installs: 284,662 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 445 major competitor apps |
| content | 58 | 100 | 57 | 76 2,368 competing apps Median installs: 245,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 481 major competitor apps |
| created | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 953 competing apps Median installs: 213,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| list | 58 | 100 | 52 | 70 1,187 competing apps Median installs: 244,150 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| way | 59 | 100 | 60 | 83 4,665 competing apps Median installs: 271,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,067 major competitor apps |
| built | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 855 competing apps Median installs: 239,450 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 175 major competitor apps |
| include | 58 | 100 | 45 | 64 693 competing apps Median installs: 243,825 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 152 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 58 | 100 | 60 | 81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 846 major competitor apps |
| provide | 58 | 100 | 49 | 73 1,667 competing apps Median installs: 243,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 293 major competitor apps |
| goal | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 764 competing apps Median installs: 244,162 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 151 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 78 2,846 competing apps Median installs: 239,425 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| combine | 58 | 100 | 44 | 63 582 competing apps Median installs: 275,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 136 major competitor apps |
| university | 57 | 100 | 31 | 41 67 competing apps Median installs: 211,800 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 58 | 100 | 53 | 69 1,101 competing apps Median installs: 270,025 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| access | 59 | 100 | 63 | 86 6,181 competing apps Median installs: 268,700 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,388 major competitor apps |
| students | 57 | 100 | 38 | 54 253 competing apps Median installs: 213,650 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| create | 59 | 100 | 61 | 85 5,537 competing apps Median installs: 251,325 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,155 major competitor apps |
| city | 58 | 100 | 47 | 67 877 competing apps Median installs: 255,375 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 190 major competitor apps |
| located | 57 | 100 | 44 | 48 127 competing apps Median installs: 228,775 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 24 major competitor apps |
| quality | 58 | 100 | 53 | 74 1,906 competing apps Median installs: 248,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
App Description
SPQR-ND allows students, scholars, and enthusiasts to study the monuments in the Roman Forum through early architectural publications. These rare and early publications have been fully digitized and broken apart virtually to allow one to study different interpretations of the monuments in the Forum side-by-side. The monuments are geo-located on a map allowing one to understand their physical placement within the Forum.
Features:
- Interactive map of the Roman Forum
- Photographic and digitized historic print representations of the
monuments in the Roman Forum
- Browsable list of the monuments in the Forum
- Descriptive information on the monuments in the Forum
- Multiple historic representations of each monument
- Detailed, zoomable views of historic public plates
- Historical layered maps
- Bibliographic information
Future versions will include additional monuments, multiple languages, and a 3D viewer that will allow users to study high-quality scanned data stitched together to create a virtual monument.
SPQR-ND was created by a team from the University of Notre Dame interested in virtual representations of the built environment. The team is comprised of Hesburgh Libraries of Notre Dame’s Architecture Library, the School of Architecture’s Information Technology Division, and the Center for Digital Scholarship. Content in the app is prepared by School of Architecture students.