SPQR-ND
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 100 keywords for SPQR-ND in Apple App Store
SPQR-ND tracks 100 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 100 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 37.9.
Tracked keywords
100
0 ranked • 100 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: maps
Avg difficulty
37.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.7
maps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 121
- 65.4
combine
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 114
- 64.0
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 11
- 65.4
located
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 24
- 66.5
print
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 70
Unranked opportunities
maps
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 121
combine
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 114
university
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 11
located
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 24
print
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 70
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 161,747 • Major competitors: 1,351
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.8
mobile
Total apps: 119,282 • Major competitors: 792
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
create
Total apps: 117,704 • Major competitors: 1,201
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.5
information
Total apps: 111,452 • Major competitors: 551
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
way
Total apps: 106,006 • Major competitors: 1,054
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| maps | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 10,978 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 121 major competitor apps |
| users | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 61,242 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 360 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 68,121 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 656 major competitor apps |
| digital | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 45,873 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 344 major competitor apps |
| information | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 111,452 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 551 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,525 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 442 major competitor apps |
| content | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 55,121 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 496 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 26,658 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 133 major competitor apps |
| list | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,346 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 243 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 106,006 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,054 major competitor apps |
| built | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 27,861 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 144 major competitor apps |
| include | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,650 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 125 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 119,282 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 792 major competitor apps |
| provide | 68 | 100 | 48 | 80 56,348 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 257 major competitor apps |
| goal | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 20,233 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 158 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 68 | 100 | 49 | 81 67,473 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 557 major competitor apps |
| combine | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 8,012 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| university | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,636 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 11 major competitor apps |
| virtual | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 22,591 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 280 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 53 | 87 161,747 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,351 major competitor apps |
| students | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,147 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| create | 66 | 100 | 51 | 85 117,704 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,201 major competitor apps |
| city | 71 | 100 | 44 | 73 21,672 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 191 major competitor apps |
| located | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 8,014 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 24 major competitor apps |
| quality | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 52,597 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 381 major competitor apps |
App Description
SPQR-ND allows students, scholars, and enthusiasts to study the monuments in the Roman Forum through early architectural publications. These rare and early publications have been fully digitized and broken apart virtually to allow one to study different interpretations of the monuments in the Forum side-by-side. The monuments are geo-located on a map allowing one to understand their physical placement within the Forum.
Features:
- Interactive map of the Roman Forum
- Photographic and digitized historic print representations of the
monuments in the Roman Forum
- Browsable list of the monuments in the Forum
- Descriptive information on the monuments in the Forum
- Multiple historic representations of each monument
- Detailed, zoomable views of historic public plates
- Historical layered maps
- Bibliographic information
Future versions will include additional monuments, multiple languages, and a 3D viewer that will allow users to study high-quality scanned data stitched together to create a virtual monument.
SPQR-ND was created by a team from the University of Notre Dame interested in virtual representations of the built environment. The team is comprised of Hesburgh Libraries of Notre Dame’s Architecture Library, the School of Architecture’s Information Technology Division, and the Center for Digital Scholarship. Content in the app is prepared by School of Architecture students.