AgileCards Lite

Category: Tools

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 64 keywords for AgileCards Lite in Apple App Store

Developer: FTLapps LLC Category: tools

AgileCards Lite tracks 64 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 64 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 50.9, difficulty 40.8.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 64 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

50.9

Top keyword: time

Avg difficulty

40.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,805
88.7
like

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,767
87.6
story

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 167
68.5
level

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 638
77.7
team

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 445
74.5

Unranked opportunities

time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
like

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 63.2 • Competitors: 1,767
story

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Competitors: 167
level

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 53.8 • Competitors: 638
team

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 51.7 • Competitors: 445

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
like

Total apps: 7,508 • Major competitors: 1,767

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
hours

Total apps: 4,109 • Major competitors: 833

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
track

Total apps: 3,456 • Major competitors: 822

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.9
day

Total apps: 3,361 • Major competitors: 731

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
story	58	100	45	68 1,063 competing apps Median installs: 233,775 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	167 major competitor apps
level	58	100	54	78 2,734 competing apps Median installs: 274,625 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	638 major competitor apps
team	58	100	52	75 1,972 competing apps Median installs: 284,662 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	445 major competitor apps
working	58	100	52	63 629 competing apps Median installs: 245,825 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	119 major competitor apps
time	59	100	63	89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,805 major competitor apps
swipe	58	100	48	64 674 competing apps Median installs: 274,825 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	142 major competitor apps
intuitive	58	100	48	72 1,513 competing apps Median installs: 238,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	270 major competitor apps
task	57	100	39	55 280 competing apps Median installs: 239,300 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	46 major competitor apps
track	58	100	60	80 3,456 competing apps Median installs: 263,688 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	822 major competitor apps
stay	58	100	62	78 2,890 competing apps Median installs: 288,838 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	682 major competitor apps
hour	20	100	43	57 315 competing apps Median installs: 372,675 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	81 major competitor apps
plan	58	100	55	73 1,690 competing apps Median installs: 264,238 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	380 major competitor apps
like	59	100	63	88 7,508 competing apps Median installs: 276,638 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,767 major competitor apps
work	58	100	53	75 2,084 competing apps Median installs: 265,425 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	452 major competitor apps
much	58	100	55	77 2,669 competing apps Median installs: 241,125 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	569 major competitor apps
release	57	100	51	58 357 competing apps Median installs: 247,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	76 major competitor apps
tap	58	100	58	76 2,387 competing apps Median installs: 283,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	538 major competitor apps
required	58	100	51	64 665 competing apps Median installs: 263,050 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	143 major competitor apps
simpler	57	100	46	44 90 competing apps Median installs: 273,862 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	22 major competitor apps
shifting	56	100	23	34 31 competing apps Median installs: 239,450 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	5 major competitor apps
select	58	100	60	74 1,798 competing apps Median installs: 287,750 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	438 major competitor apps
return	57	100	40	56 288 competing apps Median installs: 228,375 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	59 major competitor apps
points	58	100	55	70 1,245 competing apps Median installs: 288,325 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	308 major competitor apps
day	58	100	57	80 3,361 competing apps Median installs: 261,900 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	731 major competitor apps
actual	58	100	45	62 575 competing apps Median installs: 303,000 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	138 major competitor apps

App Description

It doesn't get any simpler than this: Swipe to the Fibonacci number you're playing, or double-tap to return to 1. (Implements a modified Fibonacci sequence: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40, 80.)

Although points are not the same as hours, we use our intuitive sense of "level of effort" to select a point value. Our team treats each point as a Gaussian distribution spanning (0.5 * point) hours to (2.0 * point) hours. Feels like half a day of work? It's probably a 5. Feels like a couple hours; it could be a 2 or a 3. Ultimately, the actual time required to release an hour of work (1 point) will be much more than an hour -- hence the value of points.

With consistent planning, we can begin to track a velocity measured by total points accomplished in a Sprint. And with a team velocity, we get predictable projections.

For now, it's just points... stay tuned for more!

(Why the "modified" Fibonacci sqeuence? Because, when we plan a story or task that spans more than 13 points, we are no longer working at a sufficient level of detail to imagine that we're planning well. By shifting to 20, 40, 80, we adopt points which communicate the "level of effort," but simultaneously acknowledge that these estimates need to be refined.)