AgileCards Lite
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 65 keywords for AgileCards Lite in Apple App Store
AgileCards Lite tracks 65 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 64 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.2, difficulty 40.1, best rank 21.
Tracked keywords
65
1 ranked • 64 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 21 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.2
Top keyword: task
Avg difficulty
40.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.0
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 109
- 63.8
hour
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 153
- 64.7
release
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 141
- 64.8
return
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 125
- 66.5
actual
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 239
Unranked opportunities
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.1 • Competitors: 109
hour
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 153
release
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.2 • Competitors: 141
return
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 125
actual
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 239
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,965
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
like
Total apps: 143,203 • Major competitors: 3,240
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.6
track
Total apps: 109,353 • Major competitors: 1,552
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.6
stay
Total apps: 89,312 • Major competitors: 1,336
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.4
day
Total apps: 63,922 • Major competitors: 1,352
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| agile | 70 | 100 | 33 | 48 790 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | 21 | 21 | 14 major competitor apps |
| story | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 17,006 competing apps Median installs: 950 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 401 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 52,042 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,183 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 40,927 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 862 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 19,941 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 251 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,965 major competitor apps |
| swipe | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 13,467 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 51,121 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 604 major competitor apps |
| task | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 11,628 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 109 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 109,353 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,552 major competitor apps |
| stay | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 89,312 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 1,336 major competitor apps |
| hour | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,515 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| plan | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 37,910 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 749 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 56 | 86 143,203 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,240 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 56,073 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 871 major competitor apps |
| much | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 53,679 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 932 major competitor apps |
| release | 73 | 100 | 47 | 65 7,389 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 141 major competitor apps |
| tap | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 52,755 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,020 major competitor apps |
| required | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 18,792 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 236 major competitor apps |
| simpler | 71 | 100 | 37 | 54 1,773 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 38 major competitor apps |
| shifting | 69 | 100 | 29 | 48 717 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| select | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 48,315 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 799 major competitor apps |
| return | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 7,460 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 125 major competitor apps |
| points | 70 | 100 | 47 | 74 25,929 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 485 major competitor apps |
| day | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 63,922 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,352 major competitor apps |
App Description
Although points are not the same as hours, we use our intuitive sense of "level of effort" to select a point value. Our team treats each point as a Gaussian distribution spanning (0.5 * point) hours to (2.0 * point) hours. Feels like half a day of work? It's probably a 5. Feels like a couple hours; it could be a 2 or a 3. Ultimately, the actual time required to release an hour of work (1 point) will be much more than an hour -- hence the value of points.
With consistent planning, we can begin to track a velocity measured by total points accomplished in a Sprint. And with a team velocity, we get predictable projections.
For now, it's just points... stay tuned for more!
(Why the "modified" Fibonacci sqeuence? Because, when we plan a story or task that spans more than 13 points, we are no longer working at a sufficient level of detail to imagine that we're planning well. By shifting to 20, 40, 80, we adopt points which communicate the "level of effort," but simultaneously acknowledge that these estimates need to be refined.)