AgileCards Lite

Category: Tools

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 64 keywords for AgileCards Lite in Apple App Store

Developer: FTLapps LLC Category: tools

AgileCards Lite tracks 64 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 64 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.2, difficulty 38.3.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 64 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.2

Top keyword: task

Avg difficulty

38.3

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

task

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 48
68.0
hour

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 72
63.8
release

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 79
64.7
return

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 62
64.8
actual

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 135
66.4

Unranked opportunities

task

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 48
hour

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 72
release

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.7 • Competitors: 79
return

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 62
actual

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.4 • Competitors: 135

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 192,517 • Major competitors: 1,552

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
like

Total apps: 141,867 • Major competitors: 1,791

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.3
track

Total apps: 107,502 • Major competitors: 806

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.9
stay

Total apps: 87,363 • Major competitors: 706

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.2
day

Total apps: 62,999 • Major competitors: 740

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.8

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
story	72	100	43	71 16,799 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	178 major competitor apps
level	68	100	48	79 51,091 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	666 major competitor apps
team	69	100	47	77 40,525 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	442 major competitor apps
working	71	100	44	72 19,725 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	120 major competitor apps
time	65	100	53	88 192,517 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	1,552 major competitor apps
swipe	72	100	42	69 13,274 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	147 major competitor apps
intuitive	69	100	47	79 50,442 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	284 major competitor apps
task	73	100	41	68 11,476 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	48 major competitor apps
track	66	100	51	84 107,502 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	806 major competitor apps
stay	67	100	50	83 87,363 competing apps Median installs: 25 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	706 major competitor apps
hour	73	100	39	64 6,443 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	72 major competitor apps
plan	69	100	46	77 37,324 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	384 major competitor apps
like	65	100	52	86 141,867 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	1,791 major competitor apps
work	68	100	48	79 55,376 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	444 major competitor apps
much	68	100	48	79 54,429 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	497 major competitor apps
release	73	100	40	65 7,308 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	79 major competitor apps
tap	68	100	48	79 51,305 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	559 major competitor apps
required	71	100	43	72 18,970 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	122 major competitor apps
simpler	71	100	33	54 1,793 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	20 major competitor apps
shifting	69	100	29	48 720 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	3 major competitor apps
select	69	100	48	78 47,866 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0	—	—	435 major competitor apps
return	73	100	39	65 7,381 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	62 major competitor apps
points	70	100	45	74 26,089 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1	—	—	261 major competitor apps
day	68	100	49	80 62,999 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.3	—	—	740 major competitor apps
actual	73	100	40	66 9,282 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2	—	—	135 major competitor apps

App Description

It doesn't get any simpler than this: Swipe to the Fibonacci number you're playing, or double-tap to return to 1. (Implements a modified Fibonacci sequence: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 20, 40, 80.)

Although points are not the same as hours, we use our intuitive sense of "level of effort" to select a point value. Our team treats each point as a Gaussian distribution spanning (0.5 * point) hours to (2.0 * point) hours. Feels like half a day of work? It's probably a 5. Feels like a couple hours; it could be a 2 or a 3. Ultimately, the actual time required to release an hour of work (1 point) will be much more than an hour -- hence the value of points.

With consistent planning, we can begin to track a velocity measured by total points accomplished in a Sprint. And with a team velocity, we get predictable projections.

For now, it's just points... stay tuned for more!

(Why the "modified" Fibonacci sqeuence? Because, when we plan a story or task that spans more than 13 points, we are no longer working at a sufficient level of detail to imagine that we're planning well. By shifting to 20, 40, 80, we adopt points which communicate the "level of effort," but simultaneously acknowledge that these estimates need to be refined.)