AgileCards Lite
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 65 keywords for AgileCards Lite in Apple App Store
AgileCards Lite tracks 65 keywords (1 keyword ranks; 64 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.3, difficulty 40.0, best rank 21.
Tracked keywords
65
1 ranked • 64 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 21 • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: task
Avg difficulty
40.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.4
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 110
- 63.9
hour
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 154
- 64.7
release
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 139
- 64.9
return
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 128
- 66.6
actual
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 239
Unranked opportunities
task
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 110
hour
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 154
release
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 139
return
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 128
actual
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 239
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 189,872 • Major competitors: 2,979
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.0
like
Total apps: 153,385 • Major competitors: 3,284
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4
track
Total apps: 125,707 • Major competitors: 1,580
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
stay
Total apps: 103,072 • Major competitors: 1,356
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.3
day
Total apps: 69,149 • Major competitors: 1,364
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| agile | 70 | 100 | 33 | 49 865 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.0 | 21 | 21 | 14 major competitor apps |
| story | 72 | 100 | 45 | 71 18,048 competing apps Median installs: 850 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 406 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 55,867 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,185 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 44,996 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 871 major competitor apps |
| working | 71 | 100 | 48 | 72 21,958 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 252 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 189,872 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,979 major competitor apps |
| swipe | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 14,430 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 281 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 49 | 79 58,949 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 605 major competitor apps |
| task | 73 | 100 | 42 | 68 12,997 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 110 major competitor apps |
| track | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 125,707 competing apps Median installs: 431 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,580 major competitor apps |
| stay | 67 | 100 | 53 | 83 103,072 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,356 major competitor apps |
| hour | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,957 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 154 major competitor apps |
| plan | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 42,295 competing apps Median installs: 494 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 757 major competitor apps |
| like | 66 | 100 | 55 | 86 153,385 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,284 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 61,422 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 881 major competitor apps |
| much | 69 | 100 | 49 | 79 53,393 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 931 major competitor apps |
| release | 73 | 100 | 47 | 65 7,825 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 139 major competitor apps |
| tap | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 57,719 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,027 major competitor apps |
| required | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 18,715 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 236 major competitor apps |
| simpler | 71 | 100 | 36 | 54 1,767 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 37 major competitor apps |
| shifting | 70 | 100 | 29 | 47 716 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| select | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 52,060 competing apps Median installs: 400 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 803 major competitor apps |
| return | 73 | 100 | 41 | 65 8,058 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 128 major competitor apps |
| points | 71 | 100 | 47 | 73 25,839 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 495 major competitor apps |
| day | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 69,149 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,364 major competitor apps |
App Description
Although points are not the same as hours, we use our intuitive sense of "level of effort" to select a point value. Our team treats each point as a Gaussian distribution spanning (0.5 * point) hours to (2.0 * point) hours. Feels like half a day of work? It's probably a 5. Feels like a couple hours; it could be a 2 or a 3. Ultimately, the actual time required to release an hour of work (1 point) will be much more than an hour -- hence the value of points.
With consistent planning, we can begin to track a velocity measured by total points accomplished in a Sprint. And with a team velocity, we get predictable projections.
For now, it's just points... stay tuned for more!
(Why the "modified" Fibonacci sqeuence? Because, when we plan a story or task that spans more than 13 points, we are no longer working at a sufficient level of detail to imagine that we're planning well. By shifting to 20, 40, 80, we adopt points which communicate the "level of effort," but simultaneously acknowledge that these estimates need to be refined.)