Signs - David Master
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 158 keywords for Signs - David Master in Google Play
Signs - David Master tracks 158 keywords (2 keywords rank; 156 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 71.4, difficulty 42.3, best rank 16.
The Freedom to Express Yourself!
Tracked keywords
158
2 ranked • 156 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 16 • Latest leader 23
Avg opportunity
71.4
Top keyword: signs
Avg difficulty
42.3
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 59.6
signs
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.6 • Rank 23
Competitors: 223
- 65.7
promote
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 356
- 61.5
innovation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 170
- 61.1
motor
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 616
- 62.1
aid
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 340
Unranked opportunities
promote
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.6 • Competitors: 356
innovation
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.1 • Competitors: 170
motor
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.6 • Competitors: 616
aid
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 340
applied
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 385
High competition keywords
access
Total apps: 337,289 • Major competitors: 11,555
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.5
experience
Total apps: 289,044 • Major competitors: 15,345
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
mobile
Total apps: 280,152 • Major competitors: 10,258
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.4
designed
Total apps: 261,871 • Major competitors: 7,628
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.9
simple
Total apps: 254,597 • Major competitors: 11,042
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.8
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| david | 71 | 100 | 34 | 49 1,250 competing apps Median installs: 2,282 Avg rating: 2.2 | 16 | 16 | 39 major competitor apps |
| signs | 74 | 100 | 38 | 60 5,478 competing apps Median installs: 2,538 Avg rating: 2.0 | 23 | 23 | 223 major competitor apps |
| communication | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 57,176 competing apps Median installs: 614 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 1,193 major competitor apps |
| focus | 70 | 100 | 52 | 76 59,290 competing apps Median installs: 786 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,834 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 116,532 competing apps Median installs: 1,489 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,298 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 169,442 competing apps Median installs: 1,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,314 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,213 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| experience | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 289,044 competing apps Median installs: 1,500 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 15,345 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 54 | 76 61,785 competing apps Median installs: 2,244 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,468 major competitor apps |
| promote | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 13,368 competing apps Median installs: 745 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 356 major competitor apps |
| organization | 73 | 100 | 44 | 69 20,254 competing apps Median installs: 438 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 323 major competitor apps |
| section | 71 | 100 | 47 | 72 32,580 competing apps Median installs: 1,051 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 1,050 major competitor apps |
| active | 71 | 100 | 49 | 72 32,348 competing apps Median installs: 1,509 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,386 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,004 competing apps Median installs: 1,268 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 1,070 major competitor apps |
| innovation | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 7,289 competing apps Median installs: 558 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| designed | 65 | 100 | 54 | 86 261,871 competing apps Median installs: 726 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 7,628 major competitor apps |
| needs | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,557 competing apps Median installs: 1,113 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,332 major competitor apps |
| educational | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 60,441 competing apps Median installs: 997 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 2,020 major competitor apps |
| working | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 42,825 competing apps Median installs: 1,462 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,673 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,152 competing apps Median installs: 1,245 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 10,258 major competitor apps |
| intuitive | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 116,413 competing apps Median installs: 759 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,118 major competitor apps |
| de | 73 | 100 | 43 | 68 17,749 competing apps Median installs: 1,394 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 663 major competitor apps |
| video | 69 | 100 | 60 | 79 85,979 competing apps Median installs: 4,001 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,102 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 130,886 competing apps Median installs: 2,587 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,369 major competitor apps |
| understanding | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,838 competing apps Median installs: 1,169 Avg rating: 1.6 | — | — | 687 major competitor apps |
App Description
The Freedom to Express Yourself!
The idea was born from the clinical experience of Dr. Davide de Martinis, a licensed psychologist, expert in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) and specialized in Augmentative and Alternative Communication (CAA). The signs derive from the clinical observation of children with motor disabilities, favoring executive simplicity and structural elementaryness to minimize the motor and cognitive load. This makes the system accessible to a wide clinical user, shifting the focus to communication as a universal skill.
The adoption of the ABA-VB methodology (Skinner, 1957) promotes psychosocial inclusion by teaching functional communicative behaviors. Learning is gradual, starting from primary needs, with measurable objectives. Behavior analysis guides individualized teaching, with correction procedures based on positive reinforcement. The acquisition of signs to express needs, desires and emotions is crucial for autonomy and interpersonal relationships. The section for professionals outlines an individualized approach to inclusion.
David Master Signs makes use of the neuropsychological correlates of gestural AAC: left linguistic lateralization, involvement of Broca, Wernicke, motor/visual cortices and the mirror system. Requires visuospatial working memory and executive functions. Continuous use induces synaptic plasticity to optimize communication. Neurobiological understanding is crucial to clinical AAC.
Clinically Relevant Features:
- Search for the desired term: Intuitive interface with video for quick access to signs, reducing cognitive load and facilitating participatory communication.
Target Clinical Population:
- Children and adults with expressive, linguistic and communication disorders (neurodevelopment, acquired neurological pathologies, language disabilities).
- Caregivers, educational and clinical staff (speech therapists, neuropsychologists, occupational therapists).
Design and Usability in Clinical Optics:
The simple and intuitive interface (UDL, Rose & Meyer, 2002) makes the app accessible to users with different cognitive and technological profiles, minimizing operational barriers.
Contextual Facilitation:
David Master Signs facilitates inclusive communication in educational, rehabilitation and socio-relational contexts:
- Family Context: Improves mutual understanding, reduces barriers to the expression of needs and emotions, promoting family participation.
- Educational Context: Supports school inclusion, participation in activities and interaction with peers (PEI).
- Rehabilitation Context: Aid for linguistic stimulation, social skills and emotional regulation.
Clinical and Ethical Objective:
Optimize communication and promote ethically guided psychosocial inclusion, reducing isolation, enhancing autonomy and promoting social, educational and work participation, respecting individual dignity and choices.
The project is promoted by the Lovaas Study Center, a non-profit organization involved in applied research, training and the dissemination of evidence-based tools for inclusion. For years, the Center has stood out for its active role in clinical and psycho-educational innovation to support families, professionals and school contexts.
