Radio La Ranchada
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 66 keywords for Radio La Ranchada in Google Play
Radio La Ranchada tracks 66 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 66 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 42.1.
You are invited to download our app so you can listen to us wherever you are
Tracked keywords
66
0 ranked • 66 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: town
Avg difficulty
42.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
town
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 973
- 65.0
la
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 426
- 60.6
union
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 136
- 61.4
organizations
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 93
- 64.7
strategies
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 621
Unranked opportunities
town
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.4 • Competitors: 973
la
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 426
union
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Competitors: 136
organizations
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.7 • Competitors: 93
strategies
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.3 • Competitors: 621
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 390,894 • Major competitors: 18,018
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.8
download
Total apps: 325,801 • Major competitors: 17,000
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
us
Total apps: 190,758 • Major competitors: 9,527
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
different
Total apps: 185,578 • Major competitors: 14,951
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
directly
Total apps: 129,454 • Major competitors: 4,501
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| download | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 325,801 competing apps Median installs: 2,128 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 17,000 major competitor apps |
| strategy | 72 | 100 | 48 | 71 28,896 competing apps Median installs: 4,565 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,438 major competitor apps |
| music | 69 | 100 | 56 | 78 73,690 competing apps Median installs: 2,640 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 4,733 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,377 competing apps Median installs: 1,938 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,197 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 390,894 competing apps Median installs: 1,407 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 18,018 major competitor apps |
| town | 74 | 100 | 44 | 64 9,885 competing apps Median installs: 2,506 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 973 major competitor apps |
| la | 74 | 100 | 41 | 65 11,927 competing apps Median installs: 1,275 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 426 major competitor apps |
| listen | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 75,621 competing apps Median installs: 2,300 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,355 major competitor apps |
| directly | 67 | 100 | 52 | 81 129,454 competing apps Median installs: 977 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,501 major competitor apps |
| union | 74 | 100 | 37 | 61 6,326 competing apps Median installs: 1,771 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 136 major competitor apps |
| around | 68 | 100 | 57 | 79 89,507 competing apps Median installs: 3,459 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 6,348 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 51 | 78 83,651 competing apps Median installs: 547 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 2,679 major competitor apps |
| radio | 70 | 100 | 46 | 75 52,379 competing apps Median installs: 522 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 604 major competitor apps |
| activity | 72 | 100 | 49 | 71 27,864 competing apps Median installs: 1,302 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 1,095 major competitor apps |
| city | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 54,899 competing apps Median installs: 3,162 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,577 major competitor apps |
| social | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 118,415 competing apps Median installs: 2,900 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 6,697 major competitor apps |
| cultural | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 17,165 competing apps Median installs: 915 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 317 major competitor apps |
| station | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 27,287 competing apps Median installs: 939 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 833 major competitor apps |
| work | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 120,322 competing apps Median installs: 1,895 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,248 major competitor apps |
| next | 68 | 100 | 53 | 79 89,968 competing apps Median installs: 1,794 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,539 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 57 | 84 185,578 competing apps Median installs: 5,265 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 14,951 major competitor apps |
| wherever | 70 | 100 | 48 | 75 48,035 competing apps Median installs: 1,196 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,812 major competitor apps |
| development | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 33,132 competing apps Median installs: 1,291 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,042 major competitor apps |
| organizations | 74 | 100 | 39 | 61 7,155 competing apps Median installs: 640 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 93 major competitor apps |
| experiences | 72 | 100 | 49 | 69 22,315 competing apps Median installs: 1,104 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 775 major competitor apps |
App Description
You are invited to download our app so you can listen to us wherever you are
La Ranchada 30 years next to the town of Córdoba
Since 1987, the mutual Carlos Mugica develops intervention strategies directly around the formation and strengthening of grassroots organizations in poor villages and neighborhoods in Córdoba. As a central strategy of its actions, in 1989 the “La Ranchada community radio” was created as an unprecedented cultural event, since it was the first time that a frequency modulated radio station broadcast the popular music of Cuarteto, which is precisely the one that But it represented and identified the sectors of poor villages and neighborhoods.
From its origins, La Ranchada favored the dissemination of actions of the popular sectors of the city of Córdoba before problems in different areas of intervention such as social habitat, health, food, childhood and adolescence, work and the development of experiences productive, education, union activity and the reality of vulnerable groups, which resulted in the strengthening of numerous organizational processes of the inhabitants of the deprived villages and neighborhoods.